Debate user "More AWS-8Q Than You" about whether banging a 17-year-old makes you a pedophile

Statistics disagree you with, yiffy boy.
There's lies, damned lies (like my yiffing), and statistics.

And sure, your point stands. But those beautiful 30+ year old women didn't magically wake up beautiful one morning after a whole lifetime of being ugly; they were beautiful their whole lives, if you could have met them younger would they have been any less beautiful at 25? or 21? or 18?
Not their whole lives. And your logic goes both ways, yeah, they didn't wake up ugly and aren't ugly now, so what is the problem? Seek attractive women, they don't have to be 18-25. Under 30 is preferable if planning on procreating, that leaves 18-29, but I really don't think you'll struggle with a knocking up a chick in her early 30's either.

40 is where women become much, much less desirable in every way, but hyper focusing on teens is unnecessary.

Besides that, I am attracted to the non-physical qualities much more than the physical qualities, if women could make it passed college and go through life without losing the things that make them desirable as people then I wouldn't have the opinion I have.
They can, it's just uncommon with our garbage culture.

I've known far too many bitter, jaded, pessimistic women nearer my own age, who have no values, who are just holes, and I don't like that. Are there some women who are not like that? Sure, but why wade through the undesirable ones, it's like searching for a diamond in a pile of shit, no matter what you find down there, you still come out of it stinking.
You realize teens aren't magically pure angels either, right, I mean I knew lots of slutty chicks when I was in high school, so it seems like you have them up on a pedestal.
 
you don't use "past" as a verb my nigger.
Dude. "make it past college" is what you needed to say. It's a preposition (~ "beyond") in your sentence, not a verb.

is it not describing the state of being post-college graduation?
Verbs do not describe states.

And thank you for underscoring my point*: the irony of a man who doesn't understand basic language sneering at women as a whole from a supposed intellectual perspective.

* @Inside your walls, this is what I was talking about.

what a horrible way to describe something when you clearly disagree with me about women's autonomy and moral agency. Which is it? Am I a "misogynist" who doesn't believe women have the capacity for independent thought; or do women have the ability to determine their own path in life.
Seems like all of your disagreements with me contradict themselves.
Unless you agree that women don't possess moral agency that is.
Does the phrase, "willfully obtuse" mean anything to you? How about "dumb"?
 
How about:
View attachment 6674759
Reddit moment.
How about:

Even when I called you out, zooming in three times to bring your crossed eyes to your deliciously ironic error, you still didn't know what was wrong until I spelled it out for you.

And how about:

Shut your mouth about women's academic or intellectual capabilities until you have some of your own.
 
You can cope however you want to, and men definitely have their share of culpability, but abortion, equality, DEI initiatives in the workplace, diversity quotas, divorce, slut-culture/anti-slut shaming movements, and many other issues are a direct result of (jewish) women theorists/queer theorists like Gertrud Stein, Gloria Steinem, Judith Butler, etc etc
Wrong. You claim to have a wife from Eastern Europe, maybe you should talk to her. As far as I'm aware Soviet Union was way ahead of the west in terms of women emancipation - partially because it was their ideology, partially because they needed all capable hands to rebuild after WWII.
And despite this many western conservatives point to post-soviet nations as an example of modern day conservatism.

And if you believe that these policies haven't been supported by corporate entities and used to justify the inflation of the cost of goods to match the demand from dual-income households, while the job market becomes top-heavy with C-suite female executives and human-resource busy work and if you don't think that stretching budgets to accommodate all these new roles affects the wages of workers doing the majority of the work, driving them down while overpaying underqualified social studies majors to write HR codes...
So you know who the real culprit is (yes, it's corpos \ big business \ big tech) but somehow you still decided to blame women.

I don't have yellow fever.
Your e-daddy is: Coach Red Pill, may he rest in piss.
 
What makes me laugh so much is the pure projection, and maybe baiting to get me to say "nuh uhhh I'm actually..." like you're trying to get me to share personal information or something.
Have fun with your two abortions and a dog with your blown out roastie girlfriends who will definitely cheat on you because they lost the ability to pair bond after years of abusing their dopamine and oxytocin receptors in the process of "finding themselves"
crusty brown hands rage typed these words whilst dying alone
 
You claim to have a wife from Eastern Europe, maybe you should talk to her. As far as I'm aware Soviet Union was way ahead of the west in terms of women emancipation - partially because it was their ideology, partially because they needed all capable hands to rebuild after WWII.
And despite this many western conservatives point to post-soviet nations as an example of modern day conservatism.
Even if he asked his anime body pillow about world history, it would be unable to reply. Despite witnessing horrors beyond our comprehension daily, it has no mouth with which to scream.
 
The soviets also threw Christians into gulags so I guess there are no Christians in Eastern Europe either.
Oh wait
Are you this ignorant or assume that I'm ignorant? Eastern Orthodox Church operated legally. It was obviously infiltrated by state's agents and often exploited for political purposes but vast majority of Soviet Union citizens were Christians.
Of course there were anti-religious sentiments and legislation but religion was never banned or outlawed.

The corporations are only following / exploiting the market trends created by a post OWS identity culture and women are the primary consumers of this culture.
So either women are overgrown children without complex personalities and need men to tell them what to do and what to believe or they are capable of creating market trends and shifting cultural zeitgeist.
Can't be both.
 
Last edited:
I married an 18 year old eastern european woman who is just happy that I don't drink too much and I'm not physically abusive who I met when she was 17.
Given how fast she decided to meet with you and marry you, I'm pretty sure you just felt for one of the oldest tricks in the book for women from the second and third world desperate to leave their countries by any means necessary. As soon as she has the necessary paperwork she's going to divorce rape your ass and you deserve it for being a retarded groomer.
This fucking guy admits to having a mail-order bride.
Groomers don't tend to be sharpest tools in the shed.
 
Back