Debate user "More AWS-8Q Than You" about whether banging a 17-year-old makes you a pedophile

Syzyg

kiwifarms.net
Joined
Jul 17, 2023
"Banging 17 year old = Pedophile." Over the age of consent in most of the world. Christ above, every single damn person who keeps slowly shifting pedophilia away from Raping Children needs a blunt object to the back of the head. It's sex with a minor and statutory rape. This has nothing to do with the appropriateness of said sex, if it actually happened, I'm sick and fucking tired dipshit millennials acting like fucking a 24 year old and a 4 year old is the same thing. Like there's some effort to confuse the whole thing. "I was 20 and he was 30, that's like pedophilia." No, it isn't, at all.

Should I use the word ephebophile, instead?
 
Can we stop pretending that someone who's willing to fuck a 17 year old (as morally dubious as that is) is automatically going to rape toddlers. You're eroding the total moral repugnancy of the term 'pedophile'. Teenagers aren't smart or qualified to be able to consent but they are nowhere near as inherently helpless physically and intellectually as children, and the psyche of the offender is fully aware of that. Some sleezeball going after barely underaged girls is a far cry from a child rapist.

And no. This isn't me saying it's okay to have sex with teenagers
 
Even if it's an anomaly, if true, the love letters are sufficient evidence of attraction to an underage individual.

Would you also call Jerry Seinfeld's relationship with a 17-year-old an anomaly as well?
Don't know, did it happen more than once, were the rest of his public relationships with legal age women? Does Jerry Seinfield have a history of relationships with underage girls or was it just the one? Pedophilia is sexual attraction to prepubescent children, is a 17 year old a prepubescent child? Is a 21 year old, whether or not her frontal lobe is fully developed?

Can we stop pretending that someone who's willing to fuck a 17 year old (as morally dubious as that is) is automatically going to rape toddlers. You're eroding the total moral repugnancy of the term 'pedophile'. Teenagers aren't smart or qualified to be able to consent but they are nowhere near as inherently helpless physically and intellectually as children, and the psyche of the offender is fully aware of that. Some sleezeball going after barely underaged girls is a far cry from a child rapist.
This. Pedophilia is Child Rape. Period. I've had someone pull the "Well, I was 20 and he was 30 and that's basically grooming and pedophilia." I don't like the seriousness of the term being stretched. Feels like a sideways attempt to muddy the waters. Kinda like the "If a child can consent to transing out, they can consent to sex," we all know is coming if it hasn't already.
 
This. Pedophilia is Child Rape. Period. I've had someone pull the "Well, I was 20 and he was 30 and that's basically grooming and pedophilia." I don't like the seriousness of the term being stretched. Feels like a sideways attempt to muddy the waters. Kinda like the "If a child can consent to transing out, they can consent to sex," we all know is coming if it hasn't already.
Here's how I think of it: if you're an adult dating somebody with a "teen" in their age number, you're a creep. There, that simple enough?
 
Here's how I think of it: if you're an adult dating somebody with a "teen" in their age number, you're a creep. There, that simple enough?
Generally speaking, yes. I'm not supporting a 40 year old banging a teenager here, I'm ranting about people equating it with Raping Prepubescent Children because it dilutes the meaning of the word. And I've had to endure women going about "Well, the frontal lobe doesn't finish developing until 25, and that's like pedophilia." I don't like the term being stretched because it feels like it could be used by progressives to eventually justify Raping Children.
 
I agree, I don't think this qualifies as proper diddling. I already had to deal with creeps using "muh infantilizing young adults" as an excuse to justify fucking people considerably younger than they were this week and this reads nothing like it. That being said Cormac being in a relationship with a 16 or 17 year old as a 45 year old man is fucked regardless of whether or not you put the P word on it.
 
Probably not. My idea was only half baked and i posted anyway. I just found it funny that the dude who constantly has old ladies for avatars would say that.


Here's Maria Riva, Marlene Dietrich's daughter, when she was 27.

1732159552536.png

Here's her at 69 years old.

1732159728903.png

Any questions?
 
Can we stop pretending that someone who's willing to fuck a 17 year old (as morally dubious as that is) is automatically going to rape toddlers. You're eroding the total moral repugnancy of the term 'pedophile'. Teenagers aren't smart or qualified to be able to consent but they are nowhere near as inherently helpless physically and intellectually as children, and the psyche of the offender is fully aware of that. Some sleezeball going after barely underaged girls is a far cry from a child rapist.
is it difficult to find women your own age rather than relying on barely legal teens as a way to fuck? cool, he's not peeping tom who likes to rape children or browse the dark web for child porn, but I feel like there's degrees to this shit
 
Why is it different when women date younger men but when men date younger women, it's a concern?
Typically, older more established and successful women want men that are more successful than they are, but those men have options and if they want to settle down and have a family they're going to gravitate towards younger and more fertile women with less baggage. This makes older women mad. Younger guys banging cougars makes the older women feel hot and desired, so that's okay. Different fertility and attractiveness peaks and such, the sexes are different, who knew?
 
Back