Debate user "More AWS-8Q Than You" about whether banging a 17-year-old makes you a pedophile

I don't believe for a second that if your daughter was worth the attention of a doctor or a lawyer in their late 20s or early 30s you would have any reservations about giving your blessing to that relationship, even if she were 17.
I don't believe for a second you would discourage your daughter from entering into a relationship with someone making 6 figures minimum who could provide for her (better than you probably) and your grandchildren.
To your first point, I absolutely would have problems with that relationship. I would have serious questions as to why a lawyer or a doctor in his late 20's or early 30's could not find someone to marry in his age cohort or even of his status. Teenagers are not interesting people because they have not lived much life at all. There is no reason to marry a girl fresh out of high school except for one's own predilections. To your second point, I absolutely would have problems with that arrangement because that would be encouraging my daughter to sell her body for money. I would, essentially, behave like a pimp treating my hypothetical daughter like one of my whores.

You do not respect women and you are only defending this behavior because you are probably Luke-Warm Tampon Tea, defending the idea of a 30-something man grooming a child. I do not say this often so that, when I do, I mean it: please do the world a favor and kill yourself.
 
Can we all just cut the bullshit? The real issue is that there is a belief that women (especially) should be focusing on being independent, pursuing careers of their own, there is a huge media and pop culture current that says women shouldn't be thinking about having kids, or families, or anything until they're 35 and that they shouldn't think about anything but being bossgirls and CEOs and breaking all those glass ceilings.

The only reason anyone actually cares about 17 year olds deciding to date an older man who can fast track them passed an education, student loans, and needing to "focus on a career" is because then that woman would be dependent on her man instead of an "independent woman who don't need no man"

That's literally all this is about. People discourage girls putting priorities on finding husbands and relationships at 17/18 because generally speaking they want stable men who have already crossed the finish line who can provide a good, stable foundation for a family.

This is evident by all the arguments about "lack of street smarts" and "lack of experience" and "being easier to manipulate"

No one has made an argument against this kind of situation that doesn't logically extrapolate to "she hasn't been to college yet, hasn't had to work yet, hasn't done XYZ ABC yet"
and it stinks of jealousy, it stinks of "well I had to do all these things, why should a younger woman than me get to benefit off a successful man when I'm still paying off my student loans"

It's pathetic.
There is no argument to make. You are a double-posting, misogynistic pedophile who should be fed feet-first into a wood chipper.
 
Burn this entire thread and it's defenders of fucking teenagers. That is all.
1713526432773.png
 
Can we all just cut the bullshit? The real issue is that there is a belief that women (especially) should be focusing on being independent, pursuing careers of their own, there is a huge media and pop culture current that says women shouldn't be thinking about having kids, or families, or anything until they're 35 and that they shouldn't think about anything but being bossgirls and CEOs and breaking all those glass ceilings.

The only reason anyone actually cares about 17 year olds deciding to date an older man who can fast track them passed an education, student loans, and needing to "focus on a career" is because then that woman would be dependent on her man instead of an "independent woman who don't need no man"

That's literally all this is about. People discourage girls putting priorities on finding husbands and relationships at 17/18 because generally speaking they want stable men who have already crossed the finish line who can provide a good, stable foundation for a family.

This is evident by all the arguments about "lack of street smarts" and "lack of experience" and "being easier to manipulate"

No one has made an argument against this kind of situation that doesn't logically extrapolate to "she hasn't been to college yet, hasn't had to work yet, hasn't done XYZ ABC yet"
and it stinks of jealousy, it stinks of "well I had to do all these things, why should a younger woman than me get to benefit off a successful man when I'm still paying off my student loans"

It's pathetic.
The woman-hate thread is down and to the left, sir.
Imagine thinking women provide anything of value beyond their looks and reproductive capacity and their ability to cook and emotionally support their man. Imagine thinking any woman is interesting lmao.
Your knowledge in regards to lolicon pornography is not interesting either, buddy
 
It's relevant. No one would bat an eyelash at a 17 year old boy dating an older woman,
They do, everyone is weirded out about Macron marrying his high school teacher.

especially with this new "hagmaxing" trend among going on with these zoomers.
Never happened. @The Last Stand's posts are not a reflection of reality.

The topic of women is relevant to the topic of 17 year old women dating older men instead of chasing careers and the reasons why this is the social norm are also relevant to the discussion.
Even before women chased careers it wasn't normal for them to marry men twice their age
 
Who is "everyone"
All people. Going from Macron's parents to french news agencies to the people ITT.

Eva Braun met Hitler when she was 17 but that's just an interesting tidbit.
What I wanted to say to this was maybe it should become the new norm. Can you honestly say you'd rather your daughter date/marry someone who was born at a similar time as her knowing how gen Z acts, knowing how bad Gen Alpha is becoming? I'd rather my daughter marry someone who was born before it was normal to chop off people's dicks and before it was normal to have 40,000 genders.
Millenials who couldn't get a partner their age and willingly chase teens 15 years their junior are even worse than the most mentally ill zoomer
 
You do not respect women and you are only defending this behavior because you are probably Luke-Warm Tampon Tea, defending the idea of a 30-something man grooming a child.
Considering that they signed up only to interact in this thread, and parroting the same talking points as Luke-Warm; I concur.

It’s sus that they also do this shortly after said user was issued a pink triangle.
 
I would think that teenagers would have sex with other teenagers per puberty and hormones. Of course, I'd hope that they're smart enough to understand the risk of young sex. But, I do agree with your question. It's inconsistent.
The thing is, we have laws on rape and age of consent because of the question of when someone is mature enough to consent to sex or not. We have laws allowing teens to have sex with each other but not adults because for one, it's going to happen as teens are in close contact with each other and two, an adult should know better than to have sex with a teen. Teens may not be mature enough to consent to sex, but they're of similar mindset so one person taking advantage of the other is way, way less likely.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UERISIMILITUDO
Considering that they signed up only to interact in this thread, and parroting the same talking points as Luke-Warm; I concur.

It’s sus that they also do this shortly after said user was issued a pink triangle.
Both of them are also oddly focused on 17yos. I'm calling it a sock too
 
View attachment 6671645
Nigger it's the literal topic of the conversation and I saw this thread at the top of the threadlist
>be @LilyoftheDesert
>joined two days ago
>uses an anime pfp from a lolicon porn game
>see blatant bait for pedos in the title
>go inside and start talking like a groyper's retarded cousin

It never even began for you, did it?
 
Both of them are also oddly focused on 17yos. I'm calling it a sock too
They don't seem to understand how to post-edit or properly multiquote which is the only reason I'm not convinced, they deserve the TRIANGLE OF SHAME for pure obnoxiousness though surely.
>be @LilyoftheDesert
>joined two days ago
>uses an anime pfp from a lolicon porn game
>see blatant bait for pedos in the title
>go inside and start talking like a groyper's retarded cousin
Animes, am I right?
@LilyoftheDesert can we get a bulletpointed manifesto? I wanna skewer.
 
Back