Debate user @SSj_ness on the relative morality between hunting, eating meat, killing cats, and rape

Mankirk

Mankirk

Invited by Mankirk
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Aug 3, 2016
https://kiwifarms.net/threads/debat...een-a-femboi-and-a-troon.186630/post-17987577 Two full pages and counting (lord forgive me for contributing) @SSj_Ness since you have so much to say on the topic maybe do it here so we can laugh at that fictopedo on-topic again.

SSj_Ness said:
But what difference does it make if you hunt and eat your kill or not? Does eating it somehow justify the pleasure of the hunt? Or should hunters be monitored to ensure they don't like it too much, attaching facial sensors to detect if their mask of stoicism falters?

This seems very arbitrary. Either killing the animal is wrong or not. The difference between going to prison and winning a hunting competition shouldn't be whether you eat it or crack a smile.
Click to expand...
SSj_Ness said:
We're inherently more valuable. From an Atheistic perspective we're more intelligent and higher up the food chain, it's the natural order, so we have more value. From a Christian perspective we're also more valuable because God set us above animals.

This is essentially to equate cats and people then. Different degrees of crime deserve different punishments. So if you steal a candy bar you get a slap on the wrist, you kill somebody and you get life in prison/death. If you jail someone for life over the candy bar too then you're not setting a moral distinction between the acts.

If there was a cat and a baby in a burning building and you could only save one, which would it be and why?

People with pet pigs wouldn't agree cats are any more valuable than their cute little piggies, conceding only that their choice of pet likely tastes better (not sure if pet pig breeds even taste good), which shouldn't detract from its value as a pet.
Click to expand...
SSj_Ness said:
But that's a legal perspective. Morally, either killing the pig is wrong or it's not, whether you're eating it or just got tired of seeing it.
Click to expand...
SSj_Ness said:
You wouldn't trust a hunter...? I mean a farmer is essentially a hunter on easy mode, do you trust farmers? I suspect a lot of them probably enjoy their work too, probably even take pride in it.

Remember, we don't need to eat meat, killing animals is not necessary. Veganism isn't truly viable, but vegetarianism is a healthy, sustainable long-term diet. If you aren't a vegetarian then I find this to be hypocritical.
Click to expand...
SSj_Ness said:
It's an arbitrary distinction and matter of opinion as to what exactly constitutes a pest, and you'll find plenty who think they shouldn't be killed. Ask PETA.

So let me get this straight. If someone kills a wild cat you give them a thumbs up, but if it's a domesticated cat then they are subjected to Saw film style tortures? Am I understanding this correctly?

But why is it fine? As established, this is not necessary, so these kills are simply borne of desire, not need.

To put it concisely, you're saying taking pleasure in eating an animal you didn't need to kill is fine, but only if don't take pleasure in the kill itself. However, if the animal is so valuable then we shouldn't needlessly kill it solely for the pleasure of eating it, right? I don't see how that's much better.
Click to expand...
SSj_Ness said:
Complex mating rituals do exist in nature, so does rape, so that doesn't change anything.

Consenting faggotry is slightly less immoral, but my point was it at least served a natural purpose. If you're into moral relativism then I'd expect you to appreciate it considering you wouldn't be here right now otherwise. Consequentialism is tied up with moral relavitism, after all.
Click to expand...

SSj_Ness said:
They're killed and spayed/neutered constantly at the pound to no societal detriment because we have an excess of them. I heard there's so many cats they're killing off too many birds actually.

These animals do serve a purpose in society, I never denied it, I love dogs and have one. But my only point was they're not nearly as valuable as humans. It's a valuation dispute basically.

An innocent human life is infinitely more valuable than any animal's, even a nigger's, but I'm not sure I'd be able to bring myself to actually do it. It'd be the right thing to do but that doesn't mean I could.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Winner
Reactions: Product Placement, Justa Grata Honoria, SofondaCox and 6 others
Do we really need to intellectualize and analyze every single aspect of our existence? Is it not enough to accept that people generally like cats and would resist killing them for food if there were other options? Why must every conversation in thunderdome devolve into these retarded pseudo-philosophical debates?
Will we next debate the intellectual and moral quandary of shitting in the street vs shitting in a toilet? After all, the human digestive tract is designed for popping a squat out in the middle of a field, so artifices such as a toilet, an outhouse, or a privy are not only divorcing the human animal from his natural state, but it's also the less efficient form of shitting.
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Winner
Reactions: Sundae, Product Placement, 6thRanger and 11 others
That's not how you do it usually.


As gay as it sounds you need to report the post and explain in the report that you want a containment and the mods will you just export the post to mass debate so we can masterdebate in peace.



You can also make a thread like you just did but you need to quote the key points.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: SofondaCox and Helvítis Túristi
I would happily bite chunks out of my own living flesh before I killed a precious kittycat to feed myself in times of hunger. Cats are heavenly creatures. In a period of extreme hunger I would just welcome the company of a cat (and possibly even share a little slice of elbowmeat or nubbin of earlobe ☺ ) The cat would then feast upon my corpse after I passed and subsequently become rescued within a week. He will become adopted by a good family but never truly lose his traumatically acquired appetite for human flesh.
 
  • Feels
  • Like
  • Islamic Content
Reactions: Sundae, Meiwaku, L33t Hax0r and 16 others
JamusActimus said:
You can also make a thread like you just need but you need to quote the key points.
Click to expand...
Gay and too much work, and I'm not getting jannies involved for my personal project, but enjoy the half-assed happy medium of some quotes of him talking without context since linking to the full context apparently isn't clear enough.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Sundae, 6thRanger, eatler and 2 others
Cats said:
I would happily bite chunks out of my own living flesh before I killed a precious kittycat to feed myself in times of hunger. Cats are heavenly creatures. In a period of extreme hunger I would just welcome the company of a cat (and possibly even share a little slice of elbowmeat or nubbin of earlobe ☺ ) The cat would then feast upon my corpse after I passed and subsequently become rescued within a week. He will become adopted by a good family but never truly lose his traumatically acquired appetite for human flesh.
Click to expand...
Are you an Egyptian?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6thRanger
Gremperor said:
Are you an Egyptian?
Click to expand...

I come from Elsewhere.

ebilcat.png
 
  • Feels
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Sundae, Meiwaku, Absurdist Laughter and 14 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back