Debate users on how spending hours being mad at HHH is not a waste of everyone's time,the tranny question,whether politicians are pedos,and Matt Walsh

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Nobody but you is talking about raping 14-year-old "loliwife nymphettes". Is that a term that is common in online communities you frequent?
14, 15, 16, you realize no one cares, right? 18 is a good limit, it works. Whenever someone argues for something below that, it makes you think, you know? What is the motivation? It always boils down to "before feminism, women were married off at 4; we need child brides to save the white race". It's all so tiresome.
 
You're all niggers for still taking HHH bait, after him being on KF for nearly 10 years, the fact you faggots take his bait shows that KF is going down the drain in terms of quality the fact people will take such obvious bait time and time again, if HHH was revealed to be an AI by someone, it would be the greatest shitpost ever on this site.
 
You're all niggers for still taking HHH bait, after him being on KF for nearly 10 years, the fact you faggots take his bait shows that KF is going down the drain in terms of quality the fact people will take such obvious bait time and time again, if HHH was revealed to be an AI by someone, it would be the greatest shitpost ever on this site.
lol calm down you illiterate monkey.
 
I mean the fact we have 7 pages going of people getting MATI over HHH's obvious AI generate posts just shows for itself.
It says literally nothing except "people need to release some (sexual) steam".
Duh, I even baited HHH to go MATI and release some and now he tags me with diaper fetish. :(
 
14, 15, 16, you realize no one cares, right? 18 is a good limit, it works. Whenever someone argues for something below that, it makes you think, you know? What is the motivation? It always boils down to "before feminism, women were married off at 4; we need child brides to save the white race". It's all so tiresome.
We call people with that mindset: Faggots who watch too much gook toons and think anime shit will "save the west (tm)", they'll just use "muh feminism" as a way to sound like a pseudo intellectual to other terminally online retards. Yes it's all so tiresome, but weebs and their retardation is something we just have to deal with in today's word.
 
Just because we agree with Republican boomers on some issues doesn't mean you should call us that.

We don't call you a gay pedophile because you like the policies of Pete Buttigieg.
Except you guys literally act like boomer Republicans. You defend and cheer on trying to turn the US into a theocracy. You tardrage about "degeneracy". You praise Russia.

I fantasize about redhead Eastern European women being part of my environment and social circle. You ain't included in, sisbro, cuz uh, you know, you're not a woman. Hell, you're not even a redhead!


Okay boomer, whatever you say boomer. :)
You talk too much about diapers for me to believe that. It's cool you're into that, and I do know you alt-right manlets have some weird fetishes, but still, stop flaunting it around here

I am into big booty latinas myself.
 
Because you're easily attached to them, yes?
See, here you are with your diaper obsession again
Have you been raped by gay dwarf in pajeet alley or something? You're being suspiciously focused on "alt-right manlets" that it begs the question I've just asked.
Sorry that me pointing out that most alt-righters are manlets has you so triggered
 
Except you guys literally act like boomer Republicans. You defend and cheer on trying to turn the US into a theocracy. You tardrage about "degeneracy". You praise Russia.
Every boomer I've talked to over the past year hates Russia...looks like you're the boomer on that issue.

And a little bit of degeneracy is normal but we've let it get to a level that is not ok. For example, you didn't even bother trying to defend Buttigieg when I called him a gay pedophile because you know it's probably true....just look at him. We don't need guys like that running our country. And you can't blame people for having a visceral reaction against it.
 
14, 15, 16, you realize no one cares, right? 18 is a good limit, it works. Whenever someone argues for something below that, it makes you think, you know? What is the motivation? It always boils down to "before feminism, women were married off at 4; we need child brides to save the white race". It's all so tiresome.
Neither me nor Matt Walsh is in favor of lowering the age of consent or pursuing minors in any way. Men are attracted to younger women, and often younger than 18. Minors are going to have sex. The question is what to do about these facts because it's not just going to go away. And feminist shaming of calling men insecure for what they are attracted to like they do about fat women doesn't help anything. Walsh is arguing for a return to a traditional society that existed before the sexual revolution that was actually designed to deal with these issues. He's cucked on the Jews but he's pretty solid on anti-groomer shit.

I'm not about that Andrew Anglin fed shit, homie.
 
First sentence in and you are already incorrect.

Now, you might actually think that you are somehow oppressed by those damn dirty christians, but christianity and it's influence on anything have been in sharp decline for nearly 40 years. Not only is god dead, but no one cares, you are beating a dead horse, and your efforts have been wasted.

Meanwhile, the richest people on earth are buying up all of the housing and farmland, setting up their own fiefdoms and using the government and press as weapons to supress any opposition, but you cheer them on because they preach from the same progressive bible that you are beholden to. It's no seceret that the 'progressive' values you worship has weakened society to the point that has allowed them to do so.

Congratulations, you have helped secure your own serfdom. It's all good though, at least women can now lose out on college scholarships because they now have to compete against men in skirts who exert minimal effort. Good job. Now gag on that
trans-clit.
The problem with HHH is he acts exactly like Bob Chipman. Take a look at his postings and his ideas. Everything he believes is this.
Side A aka (Dems/media/press/socialists/educated elitess.) Is automatically better then side B (Republicans, Nazis, christian/religious people, libertarians, gun owners) by default.
So Side A's worst person is always a slightly loose cannon personality but is well meaning. Even when they brain the opposition to death with a bat. (Hyperbole sue me)
But if Side Bs person obeys all the rules and even does things the Right way, they're Hitler who needs to be punished and humiliated because we're the "good guys" (the rights full of spergs too, check out cat boy deconversion thread.)

In short he's getting exactly Like this fine gentleman.
HHH is a mentally unstable homosexual
I think he is a legit incel.
Child marriage advocates get the bullet too with the troons.

Matt Walsh is a creep who should stay away from your teenage daughter.

Conservatives who bitch about troons in women's sports are the same people who make "Look how lame the WNBA is!" memes and say women who play sports are unfeminine and therefore can shut the fuck up on the topic.

HHH is just bizarro world A&H.

Drag queens who twerk in front of kids deserve to be gutted with a rusty fish knife.

There, did I miss anything? Go ahead and tophat/trashcan me now, conservatives, I know ya wanna.
Look matt Walsh has been lied about, worst thing he said was a female was in birthing prime between 16-24. (A lil werid sure) but I've heard far worse. I argue the faux outrage pushed by MSNBC/DNC CNN people would suck.
View attachment 4174217
Rent free, to the point Trump and his supporters are gamer gate for HHH.
Agreed and just like Gamergate trump still lives rentfree in his head.
I am not the one with the diaper fetish like our sick little friend over there


It does sound like him, he always has to defend his fellow religious nutjobs and boomer politicians.

He also said a South Dakota state senator, Joel Koskan, who got arrested for molesting his underaged relative was a good boy who dindu nuffin wrong. I don't think he's a pedo any more than any other religious nutjob who wants to turn the US into a theocracy is, but his crippling autism has made it so he cannot criticize anything any Republican does.
You don't live in a theocracy hulkster, if anything you live in one of the most tolerant societies of religious freedom and expression. Freedom of doesn't mean freedom from religion. We're a free society not a secular society only.
It's somewhere on my profile. Unlike the A&H autists, I don't screenshot every time one of them says something stupid because my harddrive only has a few terabytes free and it'd fill up quickly. He spends a lot of time spazing out on my profile because I don't want to live in a theocracy. He's definitely not morally sound or he wouldn't spend so much time defending Republican pedos and want poor people to starve and not have healthcare. He even couldn't bring himself to say that the 10 year old Ohio girl should not be forced to carry her rapist's baby. Like criticizing Republicans causes his theocratic brain to short circuit or something


Sorry that you get triggered that not everyone here is a 75 year old puritan with dementia, but that's the reality.
Those are a lot of words to say that you have no argument, you use strawmans to describe everything and still live in the early 2010s internet where it was still cool to call religious people sheeple and act like atheism is based because a banana fucker said so.
I've shown you the proof, Eris, but like you bible thumpers always do, you just put your head in the sand. Hell, even in this thread you said that a 40 year old trying to fuck a 17 year old is not as big of a deal as a drag queen reading a book to children.

Lol you just literally can't say anything bad about any Republican, and in doing so, it's caused you to look like a pedo.

A normal person, when shown a Republican was a pedo, would say "that's awful. He should rot in jail" or something along those lines. Not you, though. You gotta double down on defending your fellow theocrats and say "They did nothing wrong! They're innocent!". It's even funnier because you claim everyone who isn't a Republican is a satanic pedophile like a good little QTard.



Except he's literally shown Republicans doing something he said he'd be against, and instead of saying "that's retarded", he doubles down on defending it. Like show me a democrat pedo and I will denounce them. Eris, however, defends Republican pedos

I know it makes you upset that not everyone on here has autism to the point it's given them the worldview of a baby boomer, but you should calm down son. The future is now, old man
Core point, you got asked to show evidence, either a quote of it, article of it, or video of it. You don't have any of it that proves it. Hulkster you act like Republicans are only pedos because you don't want to admit the narrative you were fed by 2000s internet wasn't true. Sorry man you're not entering in a right wing theocracy, you have the constitution.
He didn't use those exact words, but if you can't tell that from the context of that, I don't know what to tell you. He said Democrats are satanist pedophiles, which he's only doing because they oppose Republicans. Are you autistic or something? You seem to have trouble with context here

And again, you're defending the guy who bends over backwards to defend Republican pedos and taking his word over mine, when I've been right about nearly everything ive posted on this site over the past decade
Alex Jones has a better track record of things coming true this last decade then you do hulkster. The only reason you're not outright banned is because the admins like flame wars between right wing and left wing speds.
I mean the fact we have 7 pages going of people getting MATI over HHH's obvious AI generate posts just shows for itself.
Hulkster doesn't have AI generating his posts. He's literally a lowcow himself akin to Bob Chipman.

It says literally nothing except "people need to release some (sexual) steam".
Duh, I even baited HHH to go MATI and release some and now he tags me with diaper fetish. :(
Who wants to take bets he is secretly a closeted abdl.

First the bullshit over COVID back in 2020-21, now this. This guy is the gift that keeps on giving. What will this mental reject sperg on about next?
This current sperg seems to be "anything the right/pol users agree with" must be alt right manlet nonsense.
 
Neither me nor Matt Walsh is in favor of lowering the age of consent or pursuing minors in any way. Men are attracted to younger women, and often younger than 18. Minors are going to have sex. The question is what to do about these facts because it's not just going to go away. And feminist shaming of calling men insecure for what they are attracted to like they do about fat women doesn't help anything. Walsh is arguing for a return to a traditional society that existed before the sexual revolution that was actually designed to deal with these issues. He's cucked on the Jews but he's pretty solid on anti-groomer shit.

I'm not about that Andrew Anglin fed shit, homie.
>I am not in favor of lowering the age of consent or persuing minors in any way
>Men are often attracted to minors
You're sending mixed messages here buddy. Your sexual proclivities are deviant. They will never be accepted and they do not represent a majority of men. They are creepy and predatory, and have a lingering pedophilia about them: like the latent pederasty of homosexual idealization of the barely legal young male. You can kvetch and whine as much as you want, feminism has nothing to do with it.

What Matt Walsh was talking about was how the problem of teenage pregnancies is fundementally a problem of single motherhood. Why is it wrong? Because it forces young women to give up higher education? A career? No, a woman dedicating her life to caring for a family is an inherently noble thing. In other words, he's saying the issue is with the equally teenaged guys in the situation not taking responsibility and abandoning their children, not that thirty year olds should be able to marry sixteen year olds. There was no reason for you to bring up those pedophile cliches in this discussion
 
Lol it's cute when a /pol/tard accuses someone of doing that. Sorry that your boomer brain has to be exposed to viewpoints that aren't from Fox News.


Lol I have posted proof time after time, Eris. You just pretend it doesn't exist and deny it like you religious zealots always do when presented the truth.

When I talked about how you defend Matt Gaetz, you said a 40 year old trying to fuck a 17 year old was no big deal. You're a sick fuck, Eris.

And no, you never say anything bad about Republicans. You said you'd be against a birth control ban. I showed you Republicans trying to do that and instead you just dissected the words of the bill to defend your precious theocratic political party. You even defend pedos in their party (like Josh Duggar, Roy Moore and Koskan), despite the fact you claim everyone who isn't an evangelical nutjob like yourself is a satanic pedo.

Sorry your latest sock account got banned, by the way


You Republican boomers are obsessed with diapers... it's cool that is your fetish and all that, I am not one to judge, but stop flaunting it all over the place please.
>Called out for texting like a SJW
>Proceeds to spend 5 pages responding with the same mental retardation with a mix of REEEEEEEEEEEE.
 
He's what you get when your life revolves around politics. Doesn't matter what side you want to be on, politics is stupid. All it does is hurt people and make people stupid.
I'm trying to be actively anti political, people like him however make it very hard to not be a right wing sperg.
>I am not in favor of lowering the age of consent or persuing minors in any way
>Men are often attracted to minors
You're sending mixed messages here buddy. Your sexual proclivities are deviant. They will never be accepted and they do not represent a majority of men. They are creepy and predatory, and have a lingering pedophilia about them: like the latent pederasty of homosexual idealization of the barely legal young male. You can kvetch and whine as much as you want, feminism has nothing to do with it.

What Matt Walsh was talking about was how the problem of teenage pregnancies is fundementally a problem of single motherhood. Why is it wrong? Because it forces young women to give up higher education? A career? No, a woman dedicating her life to caring for a family is an inherently noble thing. In other words, he's saying the issue is with the equally teenaged guys in the situation not taking responsibility and abandoning their children, not that thirty year olds should be able to marry sixteen year olds. There was no reason for you to bring up those pedophile cliches in this discussion
That makes more sense coming from Matt Walsh. I find it funny how the mental gymnastics are created by usually people on the left (rights guilty too in B4 politisperg.) But somehow thinking teen pregnancies both parents should pick up the slack gets twisted into "republican Christian men are groomers wanting to marry 15-16 year olds."

>Called out for texting like a SJW
>Proceeds to spend 5 pages responding with the same mental retardation with a mix of REEEEEEEEEEEE.
"You Republican boomers are obsessed with diapers" I'm seriously starting to think maybe the Hulkster is an adult baby/diaper lover.
 
>I am not in favor of lowering the age of consent or persuing minors in any way
>Men are often attracted to minors
You're sending mixed messages here buddy.
That's not in anyway contradictory. "Men are often attracted to minors" is a statement of fact not of support.

Your sexual proclivities are deviant. They will never be accepted and they do not represent a majority of men. They are creepy and predatory, and have a lingering pedophilia about them: like the latent pederasty of homosexual idealization of the barely legal young male. You can kvetch and whine as much as you want, feminism has nothing to do with it.
I didn't mention any sexual proclivities of mine. The "feminism" was brought in when a poster mentioned men wanting younger women being a modern obsession with insecure men and that 30+ women aren't a risk when it comes to pregnancy. That was a very feminist take and completely at odds with reality. We know what men are attracted to because it hasn't fucking changed in a million years.

What Matt Walsh was talking about was how the problem of teenage pregnancies is fundementally a problem of single motherhood. Why is it wrong? Because it forces young women to give up higher education? A career? No, a woman dedicating her life to caring for a family is an inherently noble thing. In other words, he's saying the issue is with the equally teenaged guys in the situation not taking responsibility and abandoning their children, not that thirty year olds should be able to marry sixteen year olds. There was no reason for you to bring up those pedophile cliches in this discussion
Once again, you're the only one talking about 4-year-old child brides to save the white race, 14-year-old lolisomething nymphettes, and 30-year-olds marrying 16-year-olds. If I said anything of the sort you'd actually quote it instead of resorting to dishonest meme arrow bullshit.
 
Back