- Joined
- Mar 11, 2019
Nigga I'm rich, tall and handsome.
Take your self projections of weakness elsewhere.
Debunking the Chad Myth
- Thread starter CatParty
- Start date
Take your self projections of weakness elsewhere.
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2018
Where exactly do they debunk the "Chad Myth"? I know it's clickbait, but I was hoping for some reeeeeing at very least. All I got was a bunch of trusims. Why do people need to be told to take care of themselves again?
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2017
inceldom is a result of a lifetime lack of self-confidence, a wasted adolescence that didn't build valuable social skills and no social circle as an adult.
Articles like this are no different than telling someone "lol just stop being depressed"
Articles like this are no different than telling someone "lol just stop being depressed"
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2016
Go to any ghetto or trailer park full of uneducated people and take note of their physical attractiveness. Then go to a rich community and do the same. You will find that on average smarter people usually look better.
The majority of people I see that are considered stupid by most aren't the best looking people out there. Occasionally you might get some hot bimbo or dumb dudebro out there, but these are outliers and not the norm.
"Chad" isn't a myth, it is real. What incels fail to see is that "Chad" is a state of being that can be attained by the vast majority of men regardless of physical looks. It is far more than just lifting weights and dressing better, those are just stepping stones of self improvement.
Chad is just someone being the best person they can be, and incels definitely aren't that.
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2013
A subconscious desire for the world to be "fair" in some way? Besides, smart people, regardless of looks, are not considered "cool" and will never be. Idiocracy is a documentary, also, this article is trash and the author is probably an incel in denial if not an outright cuckold whose wife gets plowed by Tyrone on the regular.
- Joined
- May 14, 2019
You're right. We need to be telling them to get HAIRCUTS, not showers. I used to be a long-haired faggot. Then I got one of those trendy Alt-Right Nazi haircuts, and now I feel like a Chad.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2013
And yet you'll still be a virgin living in your parents' basement past the age of 30. Shower and haircut isn't a bad start, though. But seriously, in this age of polarization and echo chambers, it's difficult to find a person of the other gender who at least tolerates the fact that you're not a TDS lunatic lefty.
Also, too many dicks, not enough chicks. Even obese HAES types can have their pick of the litter these days, so good luck getting your bikini model type dream girl.
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2019
It's not a myth though, I am very real.
- Joined
- May 14, 2019
My parents basement is a long way from an Ivy League university office, mate. And my virginity went years ago.
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2017
I'll have you know I graduated 20th out of 23 from a very special class and I make a good wage as an executive fry cook at a little place called...McDonalds... maybe you've heard of it? Beautiful people can be smart and successful!
Don't go opening that closet now...
Chadley Dickinson
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2019
As video games and nerd hobbies became mainstream so did the stupid worldviews abd frameworks that come along with nerd hobbies.
E
ES 195
Guest
kiwifarms.net
The virgin chad denier vs the chad chad believer
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2015
One of the weirdest things in recent times has been the sudden fucking rampant focus of the virgin/chad memes by the politically charged journalists, and in one case, the fucking air force. You'd think they'd pick a more subtle political scapegoat, but nah.
- Joined
- May 10, 2019
Not to mention physical problems (a lá Eggman) and/or genetic deficiencies in some cases. Throughout human history, more women have reproduced than men (in early societies, the ratio was 17:1, but with the rise of monogamy and more egalitarian societies, the ratio became less and less skewed until it approached 4 or 5 to 1). If it were possible for any sufficiently motivated man to be sexually successful, this would not be the case. However, the reality of being a semi-polygynous species is that some men will have a lot of sex, and some men will have little to no sex. Trying to be "aspirational" by telling individuals in the latter category that it's all very simple/easy, and that they must not trying hard enough, just makes the incel problem worse IMO. Many of them would be better served accepting that they won't be Chad and finding constructive things to do with their time that don't involve chasing tail or complaining about their inability to get any.
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2019
You, that author, and everyone ITT who agrees with you is a fucking moron.
The entire article is a strawman. A chad is simply a very good looking man. Literally no one said it was an incel vs chad binary. They are just pointing out that, simply looking amazing means that you will have good looking pussy thrown at you. Which is a fact, not a myth.
I gave a cursory google of the author.
lmao
This article doesn't outright say it, but it comes close to promoting the 'online dating is harder for women' lie.
Cope harder.
Wikipedia Scholar
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2016
I only skimmed this, looks like typical shallow, self-help waffle.
Chads/incels may not be a binary, but they do represent two opposite poles. not many people are purely one or the other, but many people are mostly oriented towards one or the other.
I think in general, the term 'binary' really muddies the water in Current Year. binary refers to only two possible states, which is often insufficient to describe the nuances of reality. however, many things can be understood in terms of two contrasting opposites when you allow for more complexity. for example, let's say you have a magnet with a north and south pole, and metal filings that generally orient towards one or the other. some bits of metal react more strongly than others, some are closer to a pole while others are further off, but you still have a meaningful distinction between two opposing forces.
too many people assume that just because a system isn't purely 1 or 0, that no distinctions can be made, and it's a kaleidoscope of everything and nothing at the same time. I see this often, especially in the far leftist treatment of gender and sexual orientation. they fail to understand that a nonbinary system can still be a dialectic of opposites. their inability to comprehend the middle ground between two extremes is itself binary, which is highly ironic.
Chads/incels may not be a binary, but they do represent two opposite poles. not many people are purely one or the other, but many people are mostly oriented towards one or the other.
I think in general, the term 'binary' really muddies the water in Current Year. binary refers to only two possible states, which is often insufficient to describe the nuances of reality. however, many things can be understood in terms of two contrasting opposites when you allow for more complexity. for example, let's say you have a magnet with a north and south pole, and metal filings that generally orient towards one or the other. some bits of metal react more strongly than others, some are closer to a pole while others are further off, but you still have a meaningful distinction between two opposing forces.
too many people assume that just because a system isn't purely 1 or 0, that no distinctions can be made, and it's a kaleidoscope of everything and nothing at the same time. I see this often, especially in the far leftist treatment of gender and sexual orientation. they fail to understand that a nonbinary system can still be a dialectic of opposites. their inability to comprehend the middle ground between two extremes is itself binary, which is highly ironic.
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2019
I dunno man, last time I checked it was a basic matter of evolutionary biology that there are as many males as females.
- Joined
- May 28, 2017
Using the bottom 1% to compare to the top 1% isn't even attempting to establish a bell curve. It's ignoring 98% of all people. If we're going that direction, the Forbes 400 is filled with ugly, old, saggy dudes who'd fit into a trailer park just fine with a simple change of wardrobe.
Again, backward logic. Attractive people aren't the majority, so the majority of any demographic will not be attractive.
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2019
There are much more attractive people, on average, in high income neighborhoods, jobs, etc than in their low income counterparts.
An easy way to observe the stark contrast is to go to various bars.