- Joined
- Oct 1, 2014
This horrorshow was rated PG? As in "Parental guidance suggested" PG??
Damn, the 70s were all kinds of fucked up.
PG-13 wasn't a rating yet.
Things were a lot more relaxed in those days.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This horrorshow was rated PG? As in "Parental guidance suggested" PG??
Damn, the 70s were all kinds of fucked up.
On one hand, this is incredibly gross. But on the other, it's not like incontinent manchildren who want to be taken care of by women for their entire lives are anything new around here.![]()
![]()
He tries to encourage adolescent girls to enforce this on their brothers. Chris is the picture of decency compared to this.On one hand, this is incredibly gross. But on the other, it's not like incontinent manchildren who want to be taken care of by women for their entire lives are anything new around here.![]()
![]()
He tries to encourage adolescent girls to enforce this on their brothers. Chris is the picture of decency compared to this.
Do you really think that EVERY boy would like to wear diapers?
No, not at all. This would be unrealistic, at best. If every boy on the planet really did want to wear diapers it wouldn't be any sort of big deal. What you usually see in my drawings are boys who, on the surface, didn't want to wear diapers at first, but they soon learn to enjoy being in their situation in spite of the embarrassment they endure from their sisters, but these boys keep these feelings to themselves. This was certainly the case for me and my situation with poop accidents and the handling thereof being witnessed by my sisters.
As these boys get older, it inevitably comes out, either through the boy's own admission, or through the intuition or other observations of his sisters or parents (usually the mother), that he enjoys wearing diapers. In other cases the sister or mother may run onto some writings, drawings or evidence of online activity that points to the boy's secretly held fondness for wearing diapers. This is the general premise behind what is depicted in many of my drawings and within the stories that I write.
Some boys do care a bit about their hygiene, and probably wouldn't want to use diapers unless they were actually incontinent.
Of course. I definitely understand this and I recognize how ridiculous it would be to presume otherwise. Such boys, of course, are not the subjects of any of my drawings, so what do you see is a filtered view of the world in which only diaper-wearing boys are depicted.
It could also be said that some of the boys are truly incontinent. Some may have autism or other neurological disorders that have caused this, but the context of the drawing usually does not make this explicit, and is left to the viewer to infer for himself/herself.
Shouldn't the boy be asked about how he feels about diapers before the change is made??
In some situations, yes. Most of my drawings do not provide any explicit context to explain why the boys are diapered in the first place, so this is left to the imagination of the viewer. One could reasonably assume that some of the boys are simply allowed to wear diapers because they want to wear diapers.
It just seems kind of mean to force it on them if they don't actually want it.
True, though in some situations, such as mine, it was deemed necessary and practical, with the punitive side of it being secondary. Also, just because it is "mean" doesn't stop some parents from actually imposing diaper discipline on their sons. The most important thing to remember, of course, is that much of this is fantasy.
Something else I just realized: All the kids are White.
Deeker the Freaker said:What you usually see in my drawings are boys who, on the surface, didn't want to wear diapers at first, but they soon learn to enjoy being in their situation in spite of the embarrassment they endure from their sisters, but these boys keep these feelings to themselves.
Something else I just realized: All the kids are White.
So Darky and I were fucking around on Skype and realized that if you replace the word "diapers" with "dicks," in certain paragraphs of his manifesto, things get even more fucked up but somehow also hilarious.
(1) Bigger, thicker, high-rising multiple dicks stand out very prominently. You don't want him to be able to hide his dick from view. No matter how he sits, stands lies down, or whatever, you should always be able to see his dick. His dick should remain fully visible at all times! This is so that every time you look at him, you will undoubtedly notice his dick first thing. You will immediately be reminded of what he uses his dick for and most of all, it will make you all the more glad that, as a Girl, you do not have to wear dicks or deal with the messes and the smells that dick boys must deal with. Unlike him, you will be able to ruminate upon all the freedoms and choices that you still have by not wearing dicks yourself. You will certainly enjoy gazing at his nonstop dicked state and find him to be look quite cute in his dick. Over time, you will automatically associate your brother and by extension, all boys in general, with dicks, especially if you are a young Girl (10 or under) and more highly impressionable.
When you look at your brother, you want to note his torso first thing if you are looking at him from the front, or his butt if you are looking at him from behind. Making his dick thicker makes these areas of his body stand out even more and impossible to ignore. Likewise, they call further attention to the functions that his body performs in these areas, and you will want to be constantly reminded of this as well.
Bigger, thicker, high-rising multiple dicks prohibit the use of pants, in which their absence helps to fulfill the first two purposes. Pants are strictly forbidden in Deekerianism (except where and when absolutely needed, at which times such provisions are to be absolutely minimal) and the use of thicker dicks conveniently makes them impossible for a dick boy to wear.
Swagrid420 said:Do you really think that EVERY boy would like to wear diapers? Some boys do care a bit about their hygiene, and probably wouldn't want to use diapers unless they were actually incontinent. I'm mysophobic (mysophobia=fear of germs/dirt), and I would have hated being made to wear diapers. And I'm sure there are plenty of other boys who have mysophobia. Shouldn't the boy be asked about how he feels about diapers before the change is made? It just seems kind of mean to force it on them if they don't actually want it.
Undiesboy (Deeker) said:Do you really think that EVERY boy would like to wear diapers?
No, not at all. This would be unrealistic, at best. If every boy on the planet really did want to wear diapers it wouldn't be any sort of big deal. What you usually see in my drawings are boys who, on the surface, didn't want to wear diapers at first, but they soon learn to enjoy being in their situation in spite of the embarrassment they endure from their sisters, but these boys keep these feelings to themselves. This was certainly the case for me and my situation with poop accidents and the handling thereof being witnessed by my sisters.
As these boys get older, it inevitably comes out, either through the boy's own admission, or through the intuition or other observations of his sisters or parents (usually the mother), that he enjoys wearing diapers. In other cases the sister or mother may run onto some writings, drawings or evidence of online activity that points to the boy's secretly held fondness for wearing diapers. This is the general premise behind what is depicted in many of my drawings and within the stories that I write.
Some boys do care a bit about their hygiene, and probably wouldn't want to use diapers unless they were actually incontinent.
Of course. I definitely understand this and I recognize how ridiculous it would be to presume otherwise. Such boys, of course, are not the subjects of any of my drawings, so what do you see is a filtered view of the world in which only diaper-wearing boys are depicted.
It could also be said that some of the boys are truly incontinent. Some may have autism or other neurological disorders that have caused this, but the context of the drawing usually does not make this explicit, and is left to the viewer to infer for himself/herself.
Shouldn't the boy be asked about how he feels about diapers before the change is made??
In some situations, yes. Most of my drawings do not provide any explicit context to explain why the boys are diapered in the first place, so this is left to the imagination of the viewer. One could reasonably assume that some of the boys are simply allowed to wear diapers because they want to wear diapers.
It just seems kind of mean to force it on them if they don't actually want it.
True, though in some situations, such as mine, it was deemed necessary and practical, with the punitive side of it being secondary. Also, just because it is "mean" doesn't stop some parents from actually imposing diaper discipline on their sons. The most important thing to remember, of course, is that much of this is fantasy.
Seeing Deekers comments is like a journey through a very disturbed person's psyche.Not sure if you guys have noticed, but someone on dA asked him a few questions for clarification on some things.
(The name Swagrid420 makes me think it might be one of you guys, but...)
They are instruction manuals, to DIY Deekerism.The way he keeps saying "your diaper boy" makes his texts sound like horrid instruction manuals.
They are instruction manuals, to DIY Deekerism.