@Steak Tartare forgive the double post but I realised my last message was unnecessarily mean and, upon reflection, I've explained myself rather poorly.
I think where we're misunderstanding each other is that I see two separate components at play:
- An attraction to women (and/or a revulsion of men)
- Engagement in romantic relationships with only women
You view these as one, encompassing package (lesbianism).
For me the second is a choice based on the first as a motivator (although not a conscious one.)
As I mention in my previous post, I'd classify heterosexuality the same. As in one is attracted to the opposite sex and, based on that motivator, chooses to explicitly engage in romantic relationships with them.
It is possible, although counterintuitive, to do gay things and not be gay.
To use a dreaded food analogy:
If you're hungry, you choose to eat food. You are motivated by the hunger and could technically choose not to eat or even to eat something inedible but this would not satisfy your hunger and would be illogical.
Thus you are pressed into the involuntary choice of eating something generally considered nourishing. The choice to eat food, as a human, is still a choice.
Fate can't force your hand to eat either burgers or pussy. That doesn't mean that alternative choices are logical thereby forcing you into an involuntary choice.
