- Joined
- Jan 18, 2016
Don't go, you're my newest favourite poster.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Cool. So you can't talk about the DNC wikileaks at all without it being a "promoting a conspiracy theory"?Stop whining, faggot, your account automatically comes off moderation queue this evening but if you keep acting like a pissy little bitch or posting your exceptional conspiracy theories I'll just extend it.
Welcome back!Cool. So you can't talk about the DNC wikileaks at all without it being a "promoting a conspiracy theory"?
The thread you locked said in the OP that it wasn't advocating conspiracies, just discussing the bizarre emails and letting folks form their own conclusions.
Cool. So you can't talk about the DNC wikileaks at all without it being a "promoting a conspiracy theory"?
The thread you locked said in the OP that it wasn't advocating conspiracies, just discussing the bizarre emails and letting folks form their own conclusions.
Yeah, but there's a big difference between the moon landing being a hoax, and a famous person being a kiddie diddler or rapist (e.x. Bill Cosby, Jared Fogle, Jeffery Epstein, etc)...I'm going to ask you a serious question.
Was the moon landing a hoax? Because there's all these little things that show it was a hoax, like reflections on the astronauts visors and filmstock that couldn't be used in space. It was done on a sound stage and filmed by Stanley Kubrick, and he was so upset by being forced to do it by the government that he used The Shining to hide coded messages to people to tell them of his involvement.
I'm not advocating conspiracy theories, I just want to open up discussion for people about the moon landing and how it's really bizarre what they did with/around it and I want folks to form their own conclusions. Do you think people should form their own conclusions about the moon landing, based on the weird evidence that could be presented and we could talk about?
The DNC Wikileaks information is very interesting. The things you were bringing up were not. They were conspiracies. There is a marked difference. Stop being obtuse.
You have a discussion thread where you can talk about whatever batshit conjecture you like. Use that.Yeah, but there's a big difference between the moon landing being a hoax, and a famous person being a kiddie diddler or rapist (e.x. Bill Cosby, Jared Fogle, Jeffery Epstein, etc)...
Fact is the Alefantis guy did send some weird emails referencing little kids; whether or not he's running a 'molestation ring from his basement or not' doesn't mean his weird emails artwork from his social media accounts shouldn't be discussed.
I'm actually done discussing him since it's going nowhere, fact is my goal was to post the DNC emails mentioning children and let people read into them, not advocate all of the Pizzagate claims from Reddit or whatever though.You have a discussion thread where you can talk about whatever batshit conjecture you like. Use that.
You have an obsession with whoever this person is and it is weird.
and the boss here @Null and a few other dudes have branded me one of the "Pizzagaters" and is ignoring my messages.
so post them in your thread. No one has stopped you doing that.I'm actually done discussing him since it's going nowhere, fact is my goal was to post the DNC emails mentioning children and let people read into them, not advocate all of the Pizzagate claims from Reddit or whatever though.