US Democracy Had Good Run, But Trumpy Ratf*kers Now Taking Over Running Local Elections

Link (Archive)

Democracy Had Good Run, But Trumpy Ratf*kers Now Taking Over Running Local Elections​

6C84C9E0-9865-4E89-99B8-6FA2CAAC4338.jpeg
Rarely is the question asked: Is our Republican electoral ratfuckers learning? At first you might think they aren't, since so many believers of Donald Trump's Big Lie are still insisting on holding Arizona-style "audits" of elections in states where the votes have been tallied and retallied and there's still no proof of fraud. But while Republican ratfuckers may be idiots who are disconnected from reality, they also know that the attempt to throw out the results of the 2020 election was thwarted in part because state and local election officials insisted on doing their jobs and running clean elections, which is why it's so important to harass them until they resign in fear for their lives. The harassers are, in fact, quite proud of what they've done, because it's to save America.

As the Washington Post reports, Republican ratfuck enthusiasts are also working like crazy to take over the machinery of running elections wherever they can. Most noticeably, a lot of committed Trumpers are running for statewide office; WaPo has tallied up "10 running for secretary of state and eight running for attorney general" across the country. Beyond that, Republicans are also working to get Trump loyalists and Big Lie advocates working at the local level in administering elections and counting and certifying the votes.
Citing the need to make elections more secure, Trump allies are also seeking to replace officials across the nation, including volunteer poll watchers, paid precinct judges, elected county clerks and state attorneys general, according to state and local officials, as well as rally speeches, social media posts and campaign appearances by those seeking the positions.
Now, such jobs have traditionally been seen as nonpartisan, technocratic positions. But that might mean Democrats still win elections by getting more votes, a clearly unfair result, so it's only fair that Republicans balance things out by making sure only legal Republican votes count.

It sort of stands to reason, at least in the way that some Republicans vote twice just to offset a little bit of the vote fraud by Democrats they're convinced is going on. Since Democrats have clearly rigged the elections, it's only fair to rig them for Republicans instead, to Take Their Country Back. It's also the same "logic" that drives a lot of rightwing media: The mainstream press has a liberal bias, so of course news needs to be given a rightward slant, even if it's dishonest. Gotta save America, after all.

But wouldn't you know it, Democrats and even some Republicans who don't understand democracy think it might be a bad idea to have elections run by committed partisans who believe loony conspiracy theories.
“The attacks right now are no longer about 2020,” said Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold (D). “They’re about 2022 and 2024. It’s about chipping away at confidence and chipping away at the reality of safe and secure elections. And the next time there’s a close election, it will be easier to achieve their goals."
And so you have states like Michigan, where Republicans are dedicated to not allowing any more of that nonpartisan independent crap in vote counting ever again. You've got Matthew DePerno, one of the leaders of the failed lawsuit to overturn the election results in Antrim County (where Trump won) running for attorney general. Another Trumpenloon, Kristina Karamo, who claimed she saw absolutely true but unprovable fraud in the vote count in Detroit, is running for secretary of state. Both have been endorsed by Trump.

But Republicans are also pushing to get loyalists on local canvassing boards, which count and certify the vote. The four-person boards have two Republicans and two Democrats for balance, but a lot of the Republicans aren't the right kind of Republicans for Trumpy types.
William Hartmann and Monica Palmer, the two Republican board members in Wayne County, home of Detroit, received calls directly from Trump, they later said in interviews.

Both initially voted not to certify, then reversed themselves after receiving promises that the vote would be audited. They then tried unsuccessfully to rescind their votes.
Hartmann remains on the board, but Palmer was replaced by Republican Robert Boyd, who told the Post he probably would not have certified the 2020 vote. But don't worry! He's got religion, so he'll do great:
“I am really interested in the integrity of elections, and I am a Christian, so I want to make sure that we do the best job we can and be as transparent as we can . . . so elections can be trusted.”
Gosh, not a bit of buzzwording there, so you know he's trustworthy. The Post notes that Boyd was one of three people the Wayne County GOP considered for the post, and that all three "have expressed support for Trump’s false claims of fraud." Count your blessings, Detroit; they didn't go with the lady who attended the January 6 rally or the other lady who was a "witness" at Rudy Giuliani's bizarre post-election parade of people telling a Michigan state Senate committee they all saw something nasty in the vote shed.

But wait, there's more!
In Michigan’s third-largest county, Macomb, Republican officials appointed to the canvassing board a former Republican poll challenger, Nancy Tiseo, who tweeted shortly after the 2020 election that Trump should suspend meetings of the electoral college and have “military tribunals” investigate claims about election fraud.
Thank heaven serious people will be doing serious things with the 2022 and 2024 votes.
There's plenty more where that came from, in plenty of other states, too, and you really should read the WaPo story if you have any free articles available, if only to relish how virtually none of the new election folks anywhere would reply to a request for comment. That Wayne County guy seems to have been a rare Boyd indeed.

Fortunately, despite the rather disturbing news that rightwingers are sharing job listings for local election administration positions on social media, at least complete crazies aren't likely to take over some of the more sensitive jobs. For instance, while a Steve Bannon fan shared an opening for an "IT Technical Project Manager” in the Colorado Secretary of State's office on a Let's Audit Everything channel on Telegram, Griswold reassured WaPo that
she was “aware that election conspiracists are encouraging people to apply for jobs in our office.” But she added that safeguards are in place that will screen out such applicants.

“Many of the positions require a high level of expertise or skill that just can’t be falsified,” she said. “Positions are available only to Colorado residents. You have to pass reference checks and background checks.”
So hooray, those jobs will only be available to highly skilled computer users, and what are the chance of them being Trumpist whackaloons?
Everything should be just fine.

Yr Wonkette is funded entirely by reader donations. Please help out with a monthly $5 or $10 donation if you can. If you read Wonkette, just think of all the money you'll save on tin foil hats!
 
I've left you guys to your own schizo conspiracy and racist retardedness but figured I'd drop by
Why the hostility mate? You need to get some cbd gummies or some shit.

You would need widespread fraud to change election results. Some random idiot going in and voting 3 times for a candidate isn't going to do jack at a state-level.
What makes you think that? Most of the states in this country don't swing. A handful of states break the election, and in those states its usually handful of counties. It would be impossible to turn a landslide loss into a win without massive fraud, but a close election would only take a couple counties.

Depending on the scenario you could swing a close with election with a small handful of people, possibly 100. They wouldn't even need to coordinate.

Regardless, why is the notion of it so out there for you? Do you really think our system is too secure and our government too moral for fraud to happen? Frankly I think it's absurd to think our system isn't rife with fraud and incompetence.
 
What makes you think that? Most of the states in this country don't swing. A handful of states break the election, and in those states its usually handful of counties. It would be impossible to turn a landslide loss into a win without massive fraud, but a close election would only take a couple counties.

Depending on the scenario you could swing a close with election with a small handful of people, possibly 100. They wouldn't even need to coordinate.
You would need widespread fraud in those states, though. And there'd be quite a bit of evidence. I think you vastly underestimate how hard it is to commit voting fraud and not get busted.

Regardless, why is the notion of it so out there for you? Do you really think our system is too secure and our government too moral for fraud to happen? Frankly I think it's absurd to think our system isn't rife with fraud and incompetence.
Like I said, if there was really widespread fraud in those states, evidence would've come out by now. And by evidence, I mean real evidence, not the ramblings of a career conman who you seem to believe over actual judges and election officials in those states for some reason.
 
You would need widespread fraud in those states, though. And there'd be quite a bit of evidence. I think you vastly underestimate how hard it is to commit voting fraud and not get busted.


Like I said, if there was really widespread fraud in those states, evidence would've come out by now. And by evidence, I mean real evidence, not the ramblings of a career conman who you seem to believe over actual judges and election officials in those states for some reason.
Your TES is showing again, my white brother.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Leslie Nielsen
The only ratfuckers here are people like the author of this article.

This is called people waking up and taking their country back from evil forces that want to destroy it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ishtar
It's hilarious to me that the left kept all of these positions vacant for whatever reason only for conservatives to swoop in and take them. The endless meltdown has been great.
The left always thinks the next election will be the "last" one.

Last in that it'll be the last one they have to win, after that, demographic replacement/aging out of tired old conservatives/the right side of history (tm) will take over, grant a permanent majority , and they only have to window dress their campaigns from that point on since it will be literally impossible to lose, so once they win a Presidency/Governorship/Congress, they immediately demobilize all other election apparatuses, leaving huge holes in everything down ballot from D.C. , from poll watcher to dog catcher to state reps and Senators, to Judgeships and they always get blindsided when they take their foot off the gas and see the opposition come back and at least seriously try to win if not win for real.

They also have a bad habit of doubling-down on this "one last election" behavior when they win the Presidency because of their short-sighted love of supreme Executive Authority, thinking everything else must fall in line or lose the King's Favor..... utterly out-of-touch with the fact that entire states can and will defy Federal wishes.

They are always swinging between feverish arrogance and headless-chicken panic, depending on if they won or lost, they NEVER find a steady middle ground. Thus the schizophrenic nature of the modern DNC which has no core message except "aren't you glad you didn't vote for the even WORSE guys?!"
 
Liberals always project.

The article reads like a "NOOOO! YOU CAN'T DO WHAT WE'RE DOING! NO HECKERINO!"

And it's why all Dems and Leftists should be yeeted into the sun.

Remember, boys and girls, Uncle Johnny says: Scratch a Leftist or a Dem and watch a tyrannical fascist pedophile bleed.

At least the current ones.

It's amazing how many people I grew up with that were on the left, still fundamentally hold the exact same values sacred, and have wound up on the outside looking in now that the establishment's gone balls-deep into crazytown. I can recall a time when posts like your average shrieking Twitterati screed arguing that anyone who disagreed with the OP deserves violence and/or death would be mocked into hell, now they're pretty much the norm, and it only ever goes one way.

Part of it, I'm sure, is that the establishment types have been like this basically forever - the disconnect between the Dem establishment and its voterbase has been a meme since time immemorial. I can't, however, for the life of me, remember any point in time when this level of madness was countenanced before everything hit the afterburners.
 
Back