TL;DR
What do you mean when you say these words.
It's called economics, and it says your shit doesn't make sense.
Everyone can be happy and have joy, wealth doesn't mean you will be happy or have joy.
Time works like this "One thing happen, next thing happen".
Keep posting, I want to fill out this bingo card.
The food was never a problem to begin with. The quality of it was. Always was and still is. The quality was always a correlation between quantity and intellect...
Define "quality".
If you mean the nutritional value, if the food doesn't have enough vitamins and minerals, just take supplements. Most of that shit you probably don't even need plants to make. Like most minerals you can probably mine and chemically process into what you need. If the amount of vitamins and minerals is what you're worried about, maybe you just genetically engineer a yeast to take in raw minerals and produce vitamins, like they do with insulin and other shit.
During these 24 hours one must receive food of HIGH quality, otherwise your chemical disbalance will fuck you up and you will become sick, that will require medical intervention, which in turn will require a shitload of other shit counteract the medicine you're taking, then you'd inevitably have all sort of unavoidable side effects etc.
The above leads me to believe that you are talking about nutritional value, so it supports my previous counter.
and the whole life will turn into constant suffering for everyone who will not get high quality food and will stay on soy. But that's not a major problem. As you've said and I agree that food is really not a fundamental issue, since it's so easy to produce by default, unless you're a complete retard anyone can do it even in the desert and among the ices.
You talk about this, but you haven't described what food "quality" is and the difference between high and low quality food. Meaning, You say it, but I don't know what it means because you haven't told me what you mean by it.
Time is not only what you need, but what everyone else needs as well and time in society is shared. In society you have to give up your time to sustain someone else's life. Just a given fact. A good example is how a woman carries a child for 9 months. She's basically giving up her time so a child could be born, so then in a chain of events the child, the father and everyone else related and not will dive up their time to somehow compensate her for the time she lost. Well, the more people there are the more will the disproportion of shared time will be. Some people will never be compensated for their time. For instance you made a job, you got paid, but you can't buy shit because you weren't paid enough. You think that it's somebody else's fault, but it's not.
I can't make out what you're talking about here. Do you mean the opportunity cost of their time? Like by raising a child, a woman looses out on everything else that could be done with that time? I mean sure, but there becomes a point where a woman raising a child is literally the best thing that she can do with her time in relation to society, thus it's a net gain over anything else she could otherwise be doing. You can have the most productive society in the world, but if it dies out in 1 generation, what does it matter? Also, time isn't what people are compensated for, production in relation to needs, is. People use their time to produce stuff. If the stuff they produce isn't wanted, then few or no one buys it, and if the people producing are rational, they use their time to produce something else that's more valuable. So if you work a job that doesn't make you enough money, then you either cut expenses or try to do a different job that will make you more money. From the other side, if you sell stuff, but you sell your stuff too high to where no one can buy it, then no one will buy your stuff, and you wont make any money. In order to make some money you have to sell it lower to where people can buy it.
You get paid a wage, because you are expected to produce a certain amount within a certain amount of time. It's not necessarily true, but if it's about true enough, you keep your job. If it's not true, then you either get fired because you produce too little, or get promoted/raise, to keep you around and produce more.
It's just that there are people who have so much value in them, literally, the smart people, not those who just conform to everything but who actually try to raise the quality of life and it's expectancy by the way as well. They are doing great things and most people unfortunately aren't doing anything greats.
Those people aren't necessarily or inherently valuable. I can have 40 genius architects working on a building, but if no one is going to actually put it together, what are those architects really worth? Nothing, because they can plan to construct a building that will never happen because no one is constructing it. So the people who construct buildings at this point are far more valuable to me than people who plan and design buildings, even though that work is "dumber".
Due to sheer numbers of people in the world most are confined to executing marginally useful work, mainly in maintenance and mass production departments. Their time can't be compensated, even though they are paid some money. But their time essentially is lost.
Again, I don't know what you mean by "their time can't be compensated" or "their time essentially is lost". The only way they can "lose" time is if they sit and do literally nothing with it. Even posting onto an EVIL harassment hate speech website run by a NEO NAWTSEE pedo and feeder who collects jew fingers, produces something (Enjoyment for myself, and potentially for people reading what I write). Regardless, their time is adequately compensated for what they do under the current system. If it wasn't, they they'd soon be paid more, fired, or paid less. Seeing as other, select, chosen people make money by selling merchandise to the maintenance/production worker, they need to sell at prices that they can afford, else they get no customers, and therefore, no money.
They were basically drained of their time while they are still living and that means that can't really live. They of course can sustain themselves with cheap food and shelter and cloth, but they will not have any joy but cope, like taking walks in the same park all their life and just making routine round until they die.
You don't need that much to be happy. Getting a wife/husband and having kids will generally make you happier with your life. Spending your time off with friends may bring you some joy. Having hobbies and projects can bring you joy. Even in these third world scenarios, you still have time off to do such things, even if it's only holidays or something. You seem to have the impression that if your not rich and/or smart you can't be happy, which is wrong, and distinctly so. If what you say is correct, why do you see more depression and suicide in wealthier countries as opposed to poorer ones?
And if this was simply the case without any repercussions then it would all be fine. Then the so called worker could be controlled and population wouldn't grow. A worker would simply sacrifice himself or herself for the good of the few and fuck off to after life, but unfortunately that's not the case, people are not like that, people have fucking feelings and thoughts and a lot of other things that are useless to them, since they can't really live anymore.
I don't understand why anyone needs to die, or why the population shouldn't keep growing. Keeping them around lets the few have such great things to begin with, and if the many disappear, the few then have to make up for what the many previously produced, but they won't be able to.
Man, I'm not sure if you even understand all or any of it, but this is what you asked for.
Try to communicate better, and be a little more coherent. If you say a word that not everyone is going to agree on what it means, then you gotta say what that word means to you when you use it, preferably in words that everyone can agree on the meaning of. Put things in an order that makes sense. Like If there are a few ideas and bits of information I need to understand an idea, please write those ideas and information and how it supports the idea.
Then there is a problem of control. Control is also done by people. The police, the army, the TV, the movies whatever the fuck is interacting with you besides when you're working is a method of control. Even your wife and children. Not even but actually quite high on a priority of important shit that controls you. Well, anyway, the more people there are and the less time the have to share, the less control there is going to be. The police isn't going to work well, the army, the wives and the children, the entertainment will turn to shit, intellectuals will become sperging faggots who bore you to death, everything will start to deteriorate because of that. The loss of control.
How do you define control? What happens with it, what happens without it? Why should we go one way as opposed to the other?
Niggers out of control. Chinks. Everyone. White rednecks.. you name it. Alt Right. Alt Left. Faggot fisting each other during fag parades. Turbosluts. Everything is out of fucking control. It's not some Illuminati bullshit as if there are some kike faggots generating chaotic politics so they can gain control over the world etc. No. It's just as the population grow it becomes very difficult to control people.
Again you're not saying much here. "Everything is out of control", and the only examples you give is "faggots being faggots in parades dedicated to faggots", and people being whores, neither of which are beyond the bounds of what you'd expect. Faggots doing faggot shit, no surprise. Some people are "turbosluts" or as I call them, whores, again no surprise. There's no change here, it's predictable, and as far as I'm concerned, if you can predict something, you can deal with it. So how is this out of "control"?
So, as I said only a few are really worthy of being alive at any point in time. The time wasn't built for many per a certain space. The time doesn't work according to what a group wants. It work only with separate single objects which together form the space of time. But each fucking second of time is personally yours and if a person is just a dumb faggot who can be used for his time, then that's what that person is - literally a time battery. Something like what they shown you in Matrix but much grimmer, because it's right here and not in a dream. You can't wake up from it. It's fucking happening to you and me and everyone as we speak.
If someone doesn't have any value then they are pretty guaranteed to die. Seeing as value is subjective, people generally place value on themselves and the continuation of their life, they will act accordingly to continue it. Unless you have some alternative way of how to value things, oh great genius. How does one build time? Addressing this further, what the fuck is your concept of time? You seem to think that time functions in a more complicated manner than "One thing happening, then another thing happening after it". In the matrix people are ENERGY batteries, they were resources to be used, not time, nothing produces time, time is just the sequence of events. Thing happen, next thing happen.
The few, those who live, they live. They are not hiding. They needed a lot of people just to build this hi-tech world for them. This is it. This hi-tech world was never intended for billions of humans. It must be obvious to anyone who actually is in touch with reality.
For people actually in touch with reality, you should realize that the "hi-tech world" isn't just built, but maintained, and you need a good portion of those billions of people to maintain it.
You can't be serious and argue that everyone can have a Mercedes or same quality. Or the house with nice land on lakeshore or some other nice place. There is just not enough of everything for a lot of people. And it was never intended for a lot of people.
In theory you can. It's not impossible. We barely scrape the surface (Literally) on the amount of resources we can tap from the planet, let alone the rest of the universe.
Eventually you probably will actually. That's how a constant growth economy is supposed to work. There is an overall increase in the total amount of wealth in the system, as you try to increase finite supply to meet infinite demand.
And it can never be even if you create magic. I was just being edgy about that. There is no way out for any of you. For me yes. For all you who are asking questions.. well all of you are fucked by default. Anyone who has question is fucked. You have questions? You are dead. That's what it means. That means you have been stripped of your time and now you just don't know shit and have no more time to learn because it's not about reading books, well not only about it, it's of course useful to read some books, but the time that is lost not gaining certain kinds of experience and understanding of life itself will cripple you without an option to roll back and gain what you've missed.
Ain't that convenient, if you don't know about it your fucked, and you just happen to know about it, because you're special and no one else sees what you see. If I had a schizoid bingo card, i have a feeling that this would let me check off one of the spots.
All I'm saying is that
Chinks and niggers have been bred and allowed to multiply simply for industrial reasons. That's it.
Who allowed them? And if that's their sole purpose, why are there so many chinks in university systems, to the point where the diversity people try to segregate them out? Even as you said yourself in another post, if you want to keep living, be smart and get a degree or something, and it seems the chinks are already doing that.
Do you seriously think we couldn't kill all chinks and niggers the minute we saw them?? These horrible fucked up looking creatures? It's now that we have those more or less tolerable monkeys who are not that bad but actually quite amusing or even highly sophisticated sometimes, We could have just killed all of them. Exterminated. In the time of Monarchies there were no problems with genociding as much as was needed. Indians we exterminated. Many people were. In the times of kinds people who killed and moved as the monarch pleased. What what give anyone an idea as if the life was all about giving niggers and chinks rights? That's like the most retarded bullshit that can be told to a human. Obviously non-humans believe that shit just like a dog believes in it's master. Not only chinks and niggers were bred to later be discarded, others too. Europeans are going to get culled as well.
Except there's nothing to be gained in killing them, so what's the point? Way better to take slave labor and land than just murder them. At that, it's not profitable because you have to send people to keep them under control, instead of just letting them handle their own shit and buying what you want from them. The Indians were an exception because we couldn't find a use for them and they weren't cooperative.
All facts of life point at depopulation. Most people have no time to spend on living. Everyone mostly wage slaves and it's already a meme. Nobody can get a decent service and it's continuing to get worse. You have to pay more and more to get a portion of quality you got before. There is not enough good paying jobs, there is not enough activities that could be enjoyed. The world is growing with people who are not enjoying themselves, suffering etc. This causes all kinds of fucked up shit in itself. Chimp outs. Crime rates. Insanity. Suicides. Local conflicts. Cartelization of authorities as well. What you see everywhere today.. all these so called global problems.. is not a conspiracy. It's just the few getting ready to reduce the population. It's nothing special. We've been doing it many times in the past. The horses outlived their necessity and were removed in millions, they were substituted by cars. Chinks and niggers are going to be substituted by machinery, automation. No reason to keep them whatsoever. No reason for them to breathe because they can't breathe MY AIR. Do you get get it now. Would you want a nigger to eat YOUR FOOD? Breathe YOUR AIR? Of course you may argue well air doesn't belong to anyone. But it really does. Everything belongs to somebody and if it's not you then too bad.
The epitome of black pilled doomer posting. Well you say it's not a conspiracy, but you have a small group of people preparing for a global depopulation effort by the shadow government you talked about in the OP, that most everyone doesn't know about except for you and now everyone who bothered reading your shit. Nigga stop being in denial, it's a conspiracy theory, just accept it and embrace it.
You can only own what you can reasonably exert force over and control who gets access. No one can own the air because how do you stop people from breathing it? You can't, thus it's everyone's. What if a nigger grows his own food? Who owns that food but that nigger? Your shit just don't work because it doesn't make any sense. But please, tell me why I'm wrong on all counts.
