Devon Del Vecchio / "Dev" / ShortFatOtaku / @sleepy_devo - Degenerate loser, honorary whiteknight for Lilith Lovett, constantly at odds with his own viewers for being a centrist

[WelperHelper99]

Could we classify him as a "dent", as in, denthead? Akin to DSP's "fans", if he has any.

More like skull fracture. I don't think you can qualify Dev's brain damage as a mere dent

 

[General Emílio Médici]

and this whole video is just retard cope explaining how ackshually liberalism isn't the problem, its PROGRESSIVISM and corruption that's the real problem chuddie.

He is doing a similar cope to Lindsay where they refuse to admit the 1990s Liberal was the genesis of the issue. He wants the world to go back to the likes of 2004 without any changes, refusing to address the issue that progressivism is the natural end result of the thought patterns and ideological framework that he is championing.

Liberalism caused this, and when the progressives showed up liberalism was powerless to stop it and in face helped it get in power. Even if you somehow miraculously turned the clock back there would be NOTHING stopping this from happening again because the main issues that caused this fucking shitshow (worship of civil rights movement, weakening of family, worship of GDP, hedonism and so on) will still be there and will simply fester into progressivism again.

Dev is literally doing the "It wasn't REAL communism!" shit except with 1990s Liberalism. No Dev, it WAS real 1990s Liberalism. It led to this. It will lead to it again and you can shit and cry all you want about how it won't but it will happen.

 

[Wodanaz]

refusing to address the issue that progressivism is the natural end result of the thought patterns and ideological framework that he is championing.

Even if this were only half true, the last decade should have given him pause, if he was able to talk for 3 hours about how awful it was being ruled by a liberal (but not a real liberal) for ten years. But it didn't, probably because he's not an actual functioning member of society. I'd be surprised if he pays a considerable amount of taxes. All he does is goon and play vidya and talk about how liberalism is not communism.

 

[Outer Space Traveller]

He is doing a similar cope to Lindsay where they refuse to admit the 1990s Liberal was the genesis of the issue. He wants the world to go back to the likes of 2004 without any changes, refusing to address the issue that progressivism is the natural end result of the thought patterns and ideological framework that he is championing.

Liberalism caused this, and when the progressives showed up liberalism was powerless to stop it and in face helped it get in power. Even if you somehow miraculously turned the clock back there would be NOTHING stopping this from happening again because the main issues that caused this fucking shitshow (worship of civil rights movement, weakening of family, worship of GDP, hedonism and so on) will still be there and will simply fester into progressivism again.

Dev is literally doing the "It wasn't REAL communism!" shit except with 1990s Liberalism. No Dev, it WAS real 1990s Liberalism. It led to this. It will lead to it again and you can shit and cry all you want about how it won't but it will happen.

Sorry, Enlightenment brought us many of these issues that we face today with "FREEDUMB", especially to be a libertine. So if you want to place a blame, it would be in the French Revolution. But I won't go ACKSHUALLY on you, do not be concerned. The 1990s "libertinism" was perhaps the apex of the issue.

 

[Wodanaz]

https://web.archive.org/web/20170803203659/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sA3rl_NMZ-s

Mein Fuhrer... we need you to go through another hour of devon yapping about trudeau.

 

[Forklift Certified]

Let me guess the maple fag is saying: "its akkcualy not trudeau fault cuz he has to live up in his fater legacy !! " or "He is a victim of circumstances !!44!!"

 

[Wodanaz]

Let me guess the maple fag is saying: "its akkcualy not trudeau fault cuz he has to live up in his fater legacy !! " or "He is a victim of circumstances !!44!!"

Not really but he is basically doing no true scotsman on Trudeau to pretend that so called principled liberals wouldn't be doing the exact same shit.


And now for a bunch of comments.

Spoiler: screenshots

I am not wasting more time figuring out this fucking forum thumbnail shit for 10000 screenshots. I would put these below each relevant one but arrow keys are taking me to the end of the post instead so fuck it.

yes it's true he should have spent more time working instead of slapfighting on twitter
"yes I am fat and stupid and lazy and that is my best because I cannot be assed to do anything"

furry gooner avatar dicksucking him btw
"what should I say?" you should say I'm sorry, I will do better and be less fat and stupid and lazy. No this is not cucking to your audience, it's being fucking normal.

lololo.... what a joke dude. no I don't believe justin is castro's son because there's no 100% empirical evidence. no I don't care if his mother was a whore or they took vacations to cuba. I need proof proof evidence NOWWWWWW.

I'm not reading the giant wall of text in the last screenshots about the constitutionality of j6. stupid faggot leafs cannot understand america.

 

[General Emílio Médici]

So if you want to place a blame, it would be in the French Revolution.

Oh I absolutely know this. If you look into the French Revolution you will find literally every single progressive problem was present there. They are pretty much patient one for this shit, and communism as well.

They even had their very own "kill the chuds" with the War on Vendeé and trying to make reality bend to their own sophistry with price controls and blaming counter revolutionaries for all the ills of the nation.

The reason I say 1990s liberalism is because that is what Dev worships, and that while you can try and make modifications and change ideological parameters with late 18th century Enlightenment to avoid modern progressivism by the liberalism of the 1990s those issues are so deeply ingrained into the DNA of the ideology they cannot be removed without fundamentally changing it.

 

[Goddar]

Funniest thing is, he's not even as entertaining or infuriating as Ralph is. Just annoying.
Guy has moved from Sargon-lite to Ralph-lite

Honestly I see Dev as more Moviebob-light, in that they're both loser deadbeats with dying Youtube careers who are sponging off the only woman who'll willingly associate with either of them.

 

[Jaimas]

He is doing a similar cope to Lindsay where they refuse to admit the 1990s Liberal was the genesis of the issue. He wants the world to go back to the likes of 2004 without any changes, refusing to address the issue that progressivism is the natural end result of the thought patterns and ideological framework that he is championing.

Liberalism caused this, and when the progressives showed up liberalism was powerless to stop it and in face helped it get in power. Even if you somehow miraculously turned the clock back there would be NOTHING stopping this from happening again because the main issues that caused this fucking shitshow (worship of civil rights movement, weakening of family, worship of GDP, hedonism and so on) will still be there and will simply fester into progressivism again.

Dev is literally doing the "It wasn't REAL communism!" shit except with 1990s Liberalism. No Dev, it WAS real 1990s Liberalism. It led to this. It will lead to it again and you can shit and cry all you want about how it won't but it will happen.

A common misconception is that the old left simply ceded these sites to their new masters, but they didn't. The new regime that moved in was always, invariably, unilaterally, one that got the position due to behind-the-scenes dicksucking (usually metaphorical, occasionally literal), and immediately used their new authority maliciously. There was countless lefties who called that shit out, but none of that matters when you're being filtered by an unemployed fucktard living on SSDI who has the mindset of a fucking Redditor and believes that anyone arguing a position other than theirs is committing, by definition, a willful act of evil.

And when I suggest that behind the scenes, many of these positions of power were secured by means other than fair - I mean it. You can look of how they gained a footprint on sites like NeoGAF. All that's needed is for one sufficiently high-level user to give authority to a power-tripping fuck with too much time on their hands and they'll quickly use that authority to turn a given website fucking insufferable - mostly by banning and brigading any opinion that differs from their orthodoxy. If allowed, they will absolutely ruin whatever site they manage, turning it into a Digital version of S-21 Tuol Sleng, and if this doesn't outright murder the site (as it did for ResetEra) it will eventually drive off the majority of the userbase.

Either is a win for the power-tripping pricks that pulled this shit. They'd rather see something destroyed than see anyone even tangentially differing from their own ideology have it. You've seen this show a few thousand times by now.

The old guard lefties weren't stupid; they saw this shit and called it out for what it was. The problem is that the clowns pulling this shit bear absolutely no hatred to match that which they have for lefties who refuse to step in line. You hear them whine about Nazis and the Alt-Right, but that shit's all set dressing; they hate no one more than Lefties who refuse to go along with them. In the worldview of these morons, the natural state of things is to move from simple liberalism to outright socialism, and by refusing to go along with it, you are defying what they see as the natural order of things. the more left they are, the more free, and ergo the more good. Of course, that's not how it works, and even in the most bass-ackward of lefty hellholes there were people pointing out: "Can't help but notice your definition of more freedom comes along with everyone else losing freedoms except for you."

Small wonder then that so many of the old-guard lefties found common cause with the modern right.

 

[Notspecialdude]

He is doing a similar cope to Lindsay where they refuse to admit the 1990s Liberal was the genesis of the issue. He wants the world to go back to the likes of 2004 without any changes, refusing to address the issue that progressivism is the natural end result of the thought patterns and ideological framework that he is championing.

Liberalism caused this, and when the progressives showed up liberalism was powerless to stop it and in face helped it get in power. Even if you somehow miraculously turned the clock back there would be NOTHING stopping this from happening again because the main issues that caused this fucking shitshow (worship of civil rights movement, weakening of family, worship of GDP, hedonism and so on) will still be there and will simply fester into progressivism again.

Dev is literally doing the "It wasn't REAL communism!" shit except with 1990s Liberalism. No Dev, it WAS real 1990s Liberalism. It led to this. It will lead to it again and you can shit and cry all you want about how it won't but it will happen.

The sad part is that Dev is partly aware of the issue. In his video "Liberalism's great flaw" he does go over what I believe to be the biggest issue Liberalism has. Namely that it has no internal mechanism to limit itself. Progressivism and Socialism naturally spring from Liberalism in part because the latter has no real way to reject or refuse in a way that is consistent internally with the ideology. If Equality and Fairness is unequivocally good, what reason would you have to reject more of it?

The problem that Dev misses is that if Liberalism has no mechanism to stop, it sure as shit has nothing to reverse itself. We are at the point where we need to remove several things Liberalism unchecked created. And Dev rejects this, in part, because his ideology can only oppose and reject it. Just as it can only accept Socialism and Progressivism. Because if Equality and Fairness is unequivocally good, what reason would you have to support less of it?

 

[Outer Space Traveller]

The problem that Dev misses is that if Liberalism has no mechanism to stop, it sure as shit has nothing to reverse itself. We are at the point where we need to remove several things Liberalism unchecked created. And Dev rejects this, in part, because his ideology can only oppose and reject it. Just as it can only accept Socialism and Progressivism. Because if Equality and Fairness is unequivocally good, what reason would you have to support less of it?

So, as Hans Herman Hoppe would put it: "Physical removal"?

 

[Laburnum]

I wonder what direction he'll drift to now that the trucker video, at least in his own mind, isn't hanging over his head. I have no confidence that he'll actually do any work on his drama response, will the channel default back to the occasional low effort Tiktok videos?

 

[Bâtard Consanguine]

I wonder what direction he'll drift to now that the trucker video, at least in his own mind, isn't hanging over his head. I have no confidence that he'll actually do any work on his drama response, will the channel default back to the occasional low effort Tiktok videos?

That will all depend on whether Arch makes good on his ultimatum and refuses to allow Dev to be a regular on the Archcast until Dev gets his shit together. I just watched the new Starmford Bridge stream today and the subject of Dev's slapjob video never came up.

 

[DEBIRU MAN]

I wonder what direction he'll drift to now that the trucker video, at least in his own mind, isn't hanging over his head. I have no confidence that he'll actually do any work on his drama response, will the channel default back to the occasional low effort Tiktok videos?

Likely he will do an equally poor video on the Kirche drama, and then move onto rebranding his channel. In an attempt to stuff all of his skeletons under his bed. At this point, it's just going to be a continual slide into mediocrity and contranianism for him, with worse and worse returns. I imagine in a few years he might have some kind of blowout, but he's not desperate enough to really go full retard at the moment.

 

[liam dees]

If Equality and Fairness is unequivocally good, what reason would you have to reject more of it?

This statement necessarily operates on the fallacy that "equal rights will give everyone equal results".

When that is demonstrably untrue. Put 100 men on an island and hierarchies of order inevitably emerge. There is always a leader, there will always be roles beneath the leader, you will always have strengths and weaknesses. There will always be winners, there will always be losers. These phenomena occur under equal rights, and they necessarily dish out unequal outcomes for everybody.

Communists can proselytise on the value of "muh equality" but the reality of equality is diametrically opposed to what they really want, which ironically also creates unequal outcomes via a centralised state. The difference is that they would be the ones in control of the state, in control of their man-made monopoly. In short, my inequality good, your inequality bad.

I don't reject Equal Rights, but my definition of Equal Rights is to get as close as possible to giving an equal playing field to everybody and letting things play out. That's dissatisfying for any statist because of not just the fallacy I mentioned above, but also because it leaves fate in the hands of individuals and out of the grasp of statists.

 

[Wodanaz]

I wonder what direction he'll drift to now that the trucker video, at least in his own mind, isn't hanging over his head. I have no confidence that he'll actually do any work on his drama response, will the channel default back to the occasional low effort Tiktok videos?

I'm hoping that he does a Trump video in 2028 to match the Trudeau video since he thinks Trudeau is the canadian Trump. Maybe then he'll explain exactly just why he hates him, aside from "stealing the election".

 

[AWarmToiletSeat]

This statement necessarily operates on the fallacy that "equal rights will give everyone equal results".

Based and Brittania pilled.

 

[FurbusCuckus]

Likely he will do an equally poor video on the Kirche drama, and then move onto rebranding his channel. In an attempt to stuff all of his skeletons under his bed. At this point, it's just going to be a continual slide into mediocrity and contranianism for him, with worse and worse returns. I imagine in a few years he might have some kind of blowout, but he's not desperate enough to really go full retard at the moment.

Like the Comperatore fiasco wasnt bad enough?

 

[liam dees]

Based and Brittania pilled.
View attachment 7306092

Now whomst this most swanky individual?