Devon Del Vecchio / "Dev" / ShortFatOtaku / @sleepy_devo - Degenerate loser, honorary whiteknight for Lilith Lovett, constantly at odds with his own viewers for being a centrist

  • 🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.
Whatever the situation is, I hope they don't have kids as that kid is going to be abused just like what's happening with Mr. Beast's troon friend and his kid. Don't let troons around kids.
Dev doesn't seem to want them, which says things about his manchildness but atleast he's not bringing a kid into a tarded out non married family with a tranny uncle
 
Uzalu is doing another stream shitting on him. LMAO


block-bashing.png
 
What does Simmons from Fish Tank have to do with this?

Comparing him to Mundanne Matt is an insult to MM. Yeah, they both are morons with worthless opinions , but at least Matt admitted he was just doing it for money, knew when to take the L, fucked off when he got called out, and wasn't a tranny chaser.
Matt's a faggot, but when it came down to it he drove Uber to pay for his family, and he had the scoop with Metokur and Rage Pig. Then he tried to ride that wave and failed because he's a retard, though he's better than Dev still.
 
For some reason this still hasn't been posted, but here's SFO's talk with Vee:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKAUklnlBj8

Dev goes through a lot of mental gymnastics here and makes a point to say that you should be required to call a tranny the gender she wants to be called as otherwise it's rude and you're disturbing the workplace (he says firing should be on the table for this). Vee softballs him a lot and seems to not want to engage in the actual conflict. I think they get to it in about 1:30ish into the video.


One of the things I've grown to hate about these online circles, especially political ones is that they never seem to call each other on their own shit. I understand there's friendship and so on, but it's truly unbearable the way they softball each other and try to recontextualize the other parties opinions for their own audience.
 
For some reason this still hasn't been posted, but here's SFO's talk with Vee:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKAUklnlBj8

Dev goes through a lot of mental gymnastics here and makes a point to say that you should be required to call a tranny the gender she wants to be called as otherwise it's rude and you're disturbing the workplace (he says firing should be on the table for this). Vee softballs him a lot and seems to not want to engage in the actual conflict. I think they get to it in about 1:30ish into the video.


One of the things I've grown to hate about these online circles, especially political ones is that they never seem to call each other on their own shit. I understand there's friendship and so on, but it's truly unbearable the way they softball each other and try to recontextualize the other parties opinions for their own audience.
Required? He said Required? I'm required to pay my taxes, follow the law, and come into work on time IF I don't want to get fired ( if I do that's a different matter). Calling a tranny their preferred pronoun isn't any of those. I've committed no crime, the most I could be ACCUSED OF is rudeness. Truly Canada is a cucked state, needs annexation.
 
Required? He said Required? I'm required to pay my taxes, follow the law, and come into work on time IF I don't want to get fired ( if I do that's a different matter). Calling a tranny their preferred pronoun isn't any of those. I've committed no crime, the most I could be ACCUSED OF is rudeness. Truly Canada is a cucked state, needs annexation.
Here's the bit for archival purposes:




Several interesting things to notice in this clip:

1.) He does the usual centrist shuffle of framing his view as the center/default and the rest as some extreme niche. He does this when he claims that in a religious school it would be ok to misgender but in a public school respecting the tranny is the priority. So the state religion should at least partially be transgenderism according to dev.

2.) He believes respecting the pronouns is the polite and good thing to do, meaning like a lot of people he frames at least some part of his morality around what seems nice and what is socially acceptable, because I don't see how else you can call affirming a delusion good.

3.) He says that he considered the reverse situation but when vee presents that case to him he "has to think about it" and starts backtracking/adding qualifiers. What's interesting about that is that it means he never actually considered the "principle" he claims to be basing this on, if he did he would have thought of this a while back and would have an answer ready. What happened here is that dev wanted to protect the trannies first and then mindbent himself into finding some way to make saying the pronouns into a principled centrist/liberal point. He even says that defending the trans person is his "instinct".
This is why he keeps bringing up and saying really dumb stuff like : swerving into a talk on public and religious schools / not being able to drink pepsi at the job if you work for coca-cola so pronouns are not compelled speech/ students having to trust teachers so that means teachers have to affirm everything the students say ect.

4.) In the end dev says that even calling people cis or saying cis people are oppressing trans people should be sanctioned in the workplace, he admits it would be unfairly enforced if this was brought in but doesn't comment further. Mentioning this because of my earlier post about libertarians being useless for this stuff. He knows the consequence of what he espouses would be a left-wing win but doesn't care because it's principled or something.

5.) Both of these guys and their stances are completely useless. For all the talk of rational observation and logical conclusions, years of "debating" and principle talk dev is now siding with the troons and Vee can't pin him or put forward a strong enough argument, and ends up more or less agreeing with Dev in the end. Keep in mind what we're talking about here is being forced to respect pronouns in the workplace under the threat of being fired. Both of these guys claimed to not have changed their positions since they started being politically active on yt but no-one in their right mind would have said this in 2014, and just some years back they all agreed with JP whos stance was no compelled speech ever.
 
Both of these guys and their stances are completely useless. For all the talk of rational observation and logical conclusions, years of "debating" and principle talk dev is now siding with the troons and Vee can't pin him or put forward a strong enough argument, and ends up more or less agreeing with Dev in the end. Keep in mind what we're talking about here is being forced to respect pronouns in the workplace under the threat of being fired. Both of these guys claimed to not have changed their positions since they started being politically active on yt but no-one in their right mind would have said this in 2014, and just some years back they all agreed with JP whos stance was no compelled speech ever.
A fierable offense? How far have we fallen that no one can debate and stand up to this bullshit? Listening to it now, this is pathetic. Now he's defending his both side bullshit. Dude you treat them like their equal, you're lying. Every tweet and community post you made says otherwise. And his chat is calling him out lol.
 
View attachment 5081145
Enjoy. Also sorry about the size and stuff. Am away from my computer so I had to take the picture from my phone.
Here he goes with the enlightened centrism. “Holding someone accountable is always exactly the same in every instance, so you’d be just like the wokies!”

Yes tubbo, keep making fake centers to stand on so you can protect your degenerate urges and friends.
 
Posting a comment where Dev attempts to clarify his stance on the difference between the Bud Light and Hogwarts situations.

View attachment 5086453
Right leaning people weren’t seeing it because political blinders? This is why he’s a dishonest hack.

You had apolitical content creators, like LongBeachGriffy for example, who had to make videos mocking, but exposing, the situation because of the things they were getting/seeing. It was far more than the right who saw troons and their militant heel-lickers attacking people over pixels. The right saw it, like everyone else, because they were the majority and they were loud.

Dev I know you read here. It was well documented in the JK Rowling thread, and the Hogwarts Legacy thread here. Go prove yourself wrong.
 
Posting a comment where Dev attempts to clarify his stance on the difference between the Bud Light and Hogwarts situations.

View attachment 5086453
Brother you just say they haven't been watching in good faith. Fuck off. Seriously fuck off. Half of what you said is fluff and could be cut down to two paragraphs, but you write long to appear smart and confuse. Also "tranners". Very youtube friendly. You are pro trans harassment, you want people fired for not saying pronouns, which is harassment of my ability to give a fuck. In my line of work as a welder, you know what I'd do to someone demanding of me to call them a prissy name? Assign them the most boring task possible and say it louder because metal doesn't weld itself.
 
Dev came off as reasonable most of the time, but his frothing demand for girldick was his undoing (it usually is).

This was bound to happen given that he's c*nadian after all. His internal beaver could not be controlled. It's their fate. No big loss, though. Lose a youtuber, gain a lolcow. Equivalent exchange (in terms of entertainment value).

Despite all his takes, he's still a leaf on a rake.
 
I remember when Dev said it (though ironically I can't remember which video it was in). I think his whole "child sex dolls for pedis" (not actual CP, just the sex dolls) was more of the lolbert argument of "if it prevents pedos from committing child abuse and is just latex dolls, shouldn't be an issue."
It was one of his recent tubcasts I shared a couple pages back. Not only does he say it would be moral to provide child sex dolls to pedos. He also said the same about AI generated CP in the same stream since it "doesen't harm real kids".
 
Anarchy always serves power in the end. Because true power isn’t eroded by lawlessness, only the nascent competitors and old holdouts are.

I think this is a good summary of Devs’ channel and his implicit bootlicking nature.

He believes respecting the pronouns is the polite and good thing to do, meaning like a lot of people he frames at least some part of his morality around what seems nice and what is socially acceptable, because I don't see how else you can call affirming a delusion good.
This is very important too. Equating morality with niceness, even a little bit, is incredibly naive and callow.
You can pretty much dismiss anyone who does it.

“But Berrakh, you ignorant slut, being nice is fine.” Right. It’s fine. It’s not moral. Giving into pressure to enable and permit is not virtuous. Being kind, ie actually doing something to help someone, is moral. Being nice is just a social lubricant. And, as always, a lot of bad people will demand you be nice to them. Which means they want you to flatter their egos and psychoses to your own detriment.

Which is how any unjust authority or hegemony will behave. Like our current state religion.
 
Last edited:
Back