Devon Del Vecchio / "Dev" / ShortFatOtaku / @sleepy_devo - Degenerate loser, honorary whiteknight for Lilith Lovett, constantly at odds with his own viewers for being a centrist

Dev hates being called bad faith, but says people's arguments for Ruby Ridge being fucked is effectively ACAB? Yeah ok. It's not that people who see Ruby Ridge as bad are sovereign citizen or ACAB types. It's that the gov should not overreach and overreact in such a way that people end up dead for no reason, then try to cover it up. Police doing their job correctly are fine.

Also the fatbitch is not making his rebuttal video after all.


Also more devrot

View attachment 6844742View attachment 6844743
An interesting note in all this. Dev has been just seeking out whatever can confirm his initial assumption, even when in this case, it's basically been all but 100% confirmed that is not what happened. Here he's just opting to believe the marshals and their report because appeal to authority/bootlicking/etc.
 
Let's take Dev at his word that he hasn't changed. That his reading has shone a light on how wrong libertarian and populist positions are. What's wrong with these positions? What is the correct position? We don't get an answer.
In his mind, 90s liberalism.

He made a video, in which he proclaims libertarianism is prone to be subverted by socialism, but never addresses how the long march through the institutions could happen so easily the moment 50s conservatism was eroded by the liberal movement of the 60s.

But sure, libertarianism, which was never in office, would be even worse, because it would... ok.
How a political theory, that is focused on gutting most institutions, is somehow prone to lose said institutions to the enemy, is everyone's guess.
 
An interesting note in all this. Dev has been just seeking out whatever can confirm his initial assumption, even when in this case, it's basically been all but 100% confirmed that is not what happened.
So much for Bayem's Theorem.

By the way, I was reading the live chat for last video, he said that "now is the time" for the truckers video to come out.

Also, here he is saying he doesn't actually care about ruby ridge
23993.jpg
23995.jpg
23997.jpg
23999.jpg
24001.jpg
24003.jpg
What a fucking faggot.

Also, @Aydin Paladin caught a stray, lol.
 
Last edited:
This seems very glib given that he brought the subject up to begin with, then rather than dropping it he decided to double down and sperg to the max. He probably doesn't care about Ruby Ridge in the typical sense, but he cares about nothing more than his ego and is willing to stoop to the lowest levels of retardation to save face.
 
So much for Bayem's Theorem.

By the way, I was reading the live chat for last video, he said that "now is the time" for the truckers video to come out.
Only after Trudeau has resigned does Dev determine it is an optimal time to damage his reputation and re-election chances? Yeah, I'm calling BS. There's no turning back and regaining his lost audience after his shenanigans last year. We all know he's going to side with the government, but his residual audience is in for a shock.

By the way Dev, since I know you're reading this, I'm sure you have a perfectly reasonable explanation for why the UK government would cover up the existence of muslim rape gangs and protect them from prosecution with all that extra reading you've been doing.
 
but his residual audience is in for a shock.
One of the thing I love most about his increasingly unhinged nature is his absolute insistence upon inserting into his normal content. It was him doing so that in a round about way alerted me to his existence as one of my children watched him and asked me for my take on something he said. According to him, Dev never really showed a lot of his terrible takes before but increasingly has brought up his various dramas and terrible takes into his regular content.
 
One of the thing I love most about his increasingly unhinged nature is his absolute insistence upon inserting into his normal content. It was him doing so that in a round about way alerted me to his existence as one of my children watched him and asked me for my take on something he said. According to him, Dev never really showed a lot of his terrible takes before but increasingly has brought up his various dramas and terrible takes into his regular content.
SFO is a prime example of what happens when you never leave the house and instead spend a decade locked in a room on the internet.
 
IMG_20250111_171727.jpg
This part is hilarious, because if you take away all "dead wood" there will be nothing left Dev. Case in point Gameboomers. SFO vods or how the fuck he calls that channel now. He is really lucky if he gets hundred views on video. Here after quick look I found video with 2 views.
IMG_20250111_173412.jpg
There is probably some Kino content buried there, but nobody has time to watch thousands of hours of boring manchild play vidya. As far as I know there could, video Where SFO is sacrificing orphans to Sata... US goverment .
 
Honestly, Why Ruby Ridge? Why Waco? These are the two biggest examples of government malice and incompetence in US history. What happened there defines the phrase "dead to rights", to argue the part of the government there was anything other than rancid is a moral failing on your part. End of story.
Because Dev wishes to win against the chuds. So he's attacking a sacred cow. Because the state can do no wrong in his eyes, this is something that NEEDS correction. He underestimated the backlash, and now is quadrupling down, no matter how bad he looks
 
He made a video, in which he proclaims libertarianism is prone to be subverted by socialism, but never addresses how the long march through the institutions could happen so easily the moment 50s conservatism was eroded by the liberal movement of the 60s.

But sure, libertarianism, which was never in office, would be even worse, because it would... ok.
How a political theory, that is focused on gutting most institutions, is somehow prone to lose said institutions to the enemy, is everyone's guess.
Something I've been seeing a lot from Sargon and others is that returning the 90s politics/values wouldn't work because there's nothing stopping the same thing happening again. Okay, but then the solution they propose is returning to 50s nuclear family values, but to me that has the same problem of nothing preventing the same thing from happening again.
 
Okay, but then the solution they propose is returning to 50s nuclear family values, but to me that has the same problem of nothing preventing the same thing from happening again.

Going back to 50s values puts things before the Long March Through the Institutions, and it undoes the damage of Baby Boomers in the 60's, 70's and 80's. It is not perfect or foolproof, you are right on that, but it offers a much MUCH better chance to brave the future without the same mistakes. Unlike going back to the 1990s where you have all that Baby Boomer communist rot already entrenched in several levels of society and academia and metastasizing.
 
Something I've been seeing a lot from Sargon and others is that returning the 90s politics/values wouldn't work because there's nothing stopping the same thing happening again. Okay, but then the solution they propose is returning to 50s nuclear family values, but to me that has the same problem of nothing preventing the same thing from happening again.

That's fair. The way I see it, the only way to "return to earlier values" would be to change them partially to suit the conditions of the current world. Dev ironically makes the same mistake as Marxists & Neo nazis, you can't just import the world views of these 19th & 20th century German thinkers without the original starting conditions being there as well. If you are unwilling to change your mind, that isn't something intrinsically positive.

Case in point, I'm a fan of enlightened absolutism, but I'm 99% sure the concept of divine kings isn't coming back. Most people are very cynical (with good reason) & morally stunted, so you would have to convince & condition people over 50-100 years to set the ground for it to work.
 
That's a big thing. Not even the Feds like taking credit for Ruby Ridge and WACO, because it made everyone involved evil and the people they were attacking martyrs. It also made 2nd amendment advocatcy skyrocket, which was the opposite point.
More than that, it tanked the public's trust in alphabet soup agencies for 2 generations now. And that's only gotten worse in the wake of 9/11 and the patriot act, and more recently, the plandemic and the lockdowns.

The fact that Dev holds this take despite being a lefty from the Bush era originally when hating on government excess was cool is even more baffling. I'd argue his transformation into a breadtuber has already begun. The fact that he's sounding like a tankie is just proof. If we asked him about the holodomor, I'm sure he'd say that the kulaks had it coming for being bourgeois. Le heckin' radical alt centrist fence sitter mask is slipping too much for it to be held on for much longer. Maybe the fence post he's had up his ass this whole time can no longer support his weight and when it gives out completely, he's gonna collapse into a socialist sinkhole. And then he's gonna be forced to eternally repent for not sucking the girl dick with enough enthusiasm uncritically in public.

Which is why I ask: Why bother with straddling the fence at all? The left will (and has previously) come after you for either not following the correct branch of retardation or offering token resistance to it along the way. And while the right was willing to hear you out, your repeated acting in bad faith has burned any bridges.

This is, I believe, why the Trucker video isn't coming out. because Dev isn't actually an idiot, he's a midwit. Which means he likely has just enough intelligence to realize his defense of the government against the Truckers will come off -bad- to his audience and likely will be the biggest shattering of them. Because the Statist take there would alienate both Left and Right.
Exactly. He's set himself up in a position where both sides will hate him for his past conduct and his current tomfoolery alike. And he's chosen to lean more into the side that is well known to be more trigger-happy. He isn't a total assbrain, but he lacks the capacity for long term thinking. Like perhaps not going well out of his way to kick all these hornet's nests over the years when he chooses to live so close to them.

I can't believe he has a humiliation fetish given his conduct recently, but he clearly suffers from terminal contrarianism. If the pressure gets too great, he will likely pull the "HA, I was only pretending to act retarded and you all fell for it, CHUDS!" card.
 
Back