💰 Grifter Devon Del Vecchio / "Dev" / ShortFatOtaku / @sleepy_devo - Degenerate loser, honorary whiteknight for Lilith Lovett, constantly at odds with his own viewers for being a centrist


View attachment 8769941

He also replied to Amalgamyte on this.


View attachment 8769944

Basically, he's defending his own behaviour, despite having denounced another for having done the same thing.

Of course Dev didn't mention his recent hypocrisy when it came to defending that 19yo x 29yo relationship while he smeared Uzalu as a pedo for doing the same, most likely, it we farted in his commie brain and erased.
 
Shitlibs worship WW2 like it was Genesis and the fucking Big Bang. Literally the start of history for them.
Weird hypothetical, but humor me:
Lets say we show an alien or a time traveler from the past, 1936 and 1946 maps of Europe. Without any other historical context, have them guess what happened. They'd most likely think that Soviet Union successfully invaded Europe. (This is assuming the map clearly shows Eastern Bloc as Soviet vassal states.) When shown a history books about WW2, they'd probably be confused.
"West lost half of Europe and thought it won?"
"They gave WHAT to Soviet Union?"
 
Weird hypothetical, but humor me:
Lets say we show an alien or a time traveler from the past, 1936 and 1946 maps of Europe. Without any other historical context, have them guess what happened. They'd most likely think that Soviet Union successfully invaded Europe. (This is assuming the map clearly shows Eastern Bloc as Soviet vassal states.) When shown a history books about WW2, they'd probably be confused.
"West lost half of Europe and thought it won?"
"They gave WHAT to Soviet Union?"

The Red Alert scenario (the first game anyway) was unironically correct that without Nazi Germany the USSR would have invaded Europe eventually. Stalin was literally preparing to do so when Hitler invaded. The reason he was caught by surprise was not that he didn't think Hitler would turn on him but because he didn't think Germany would dare do so before they finished the war in the West with Britain because Stalin (correctly) though doing so would make the Allies support the USSR and push Germany into a 2 front war that could not be won and he assumed Hitler wouldn't repeat the mistake of the Kaiser.

The entire historical narrative around WW2 is such a shitshow. And I am not even talking about how the Holocaust has become this total meme that is treated as a main cause and objective of the war (including some people who seem to think the allies and soviets knew it was happening and wanted to stop it which is hilarious revisionist), there is so much shit that went on and realpolitik that gets ignored.

Here is a fun little fact: the UK and France almost forced the USSR into joining the Axis by being retarded about Molotov-Ribbertrop. They wanted to use British Egypt and French Syria as the launch point of a bombing campaign on the Armenia SSR Oil Fields, out of a belief that they could just destroy it all and then collapse the USSR economy to deprive Germany of their supplies and oil in turn. This was just before the Fall of France. Think about how fucking disastrous this would have been.
 
He is right. Unless he decided to do some major, MAJOR changes in his politics and opinions a Trucker video wouldn't help. The meme is no longer about the Freedom Convoy at this point, but about Dev's intelectual dishonesty and blatant bad faith when dealing with the right wing to maintain his outdated early 2000s neoliberal politics.
The meme is also how Dev is obsessed with American politics to the total exclusions of the political situation of his own country. Even when I was still a regular viewer, I wanted a detailed analysis of how retarded the Canadian government is from someone who is affected by it, like how I enjoy Sargon's analysis of UK politics.
 
I also haven't watched and don't plan on doing so, so if anyone has can you say if Dev mentions how the game:

1: Doesn't actually let you know what your choices will do, tricking the player (ex: when you are told by Amelia a immigrant brown in your class is getting a opportunity because they are brown and you choose the option to agree with her, your character instead starts screeching out loud about TND and attacking the brown immediately)
He does lambast the game for being so linear, no matter what you do. I personally found it a bit curious that he (jokingly) compares it to Mass Effect. (King of not bothering to account for the player's choices dethroned, or something like that.)

I'm probably looking too deep into this, but I'm kind of assuming he chose Mass Effect solely because the third installment's ending was such a huge meme that basically everybody in his target audience has at least a vague idea about it. Bit of an "apples-to-oranges" compared to much more applicable, but (relatively) more niche 'LA: Noire' and 'Fallout 4' - both which were criticized for having more or less the exact same issue as Pathways: hiding the what the dialogue option actually says, under vague labels like "accuse" "yes" "no" and "sarcastic".
 
Also, I haven't finished Dev's Amelia video since it's 10% about the topic and 90% sperging at his former friends over how they have betrayed him. But at the same time, I believe this comment show how much Dev has fallen off and how his partisan dicksucking brings down legitimate criticism against the right wing. The commenter shows a factual flaw of using a cartoon as pillar of right-wing values, and why it's hard to take the right seriously sometimes. I figured I'd share it here before it gets lost when Dev tries to delete the video or move it somewhere else.

1774816078298.png

@Larknok1

I think probably the most interesting part of this video is where you briefly hint at the contradiction of Amelia being a popular Alt Girl among anti-woke types who have spent the last decade railing against this aesthetic.

I think there's something there really worth examining -- I think this point is supported by the fact that the cheap knock-off of the Amelia meme never got any traction (i.e. traditional blonde German woman is **the opposite** of what's going on with Amelia).

Since I don't have 3 hours, I'll hint at the humanizing direction I had hoped at least part of the video would have gone:

Why do right wingers want an Alt Girl voicing their values? Your video needed to answer this question, and though I really enjoyed this video, I don't think it really answers the question. The closest you get to answers are (i) anti-woke guys grew up with Shego and Raven giving them goth fetishes before colored hair became synonymous with left-wing political activism, and (ii) lonely anti-woke men want to live in a hyperreality sexually fantasizing women that aren't real and shadowboxing imagined demons.

And while both of these things are certainly true, why is the fact that Amelia is an Alt Girl a powerful symbol that the anti-woke types flocked to? What does it say about THEM? Lonely and grew up in the early 2000s is just the tip of the iceberg.

Again, broad strokes: I think there's a part of all of us -- as badly radicalized as some can get -- that wants everyone to just come together. For the old hatreds to dissolve, and for us to move past all the old divides into a brighter tomorrow. I'm not saying this side wins in the minds of so many people -- I'm just saying it's there. And to the lonely anti-woke slop consumer of 2026, Amelia presents a warm, hyperreal compromise of sorts. On the one hand, you get to have all your anti-woke right-wing populist values. On the other, you get to feel like you've healed the old divide (see: the fantasy of integrating the Alt Girl (Amelia or Alysa Liu) back into the fold of your world, and ultimately, taking her as your wife) and are now leading the culture into a brave tomorrow at its head.

Amelia is a fantasy: a form of psychological cope. On the one hand, becoming a political radical has demonstrably unwound so many people's lives. At some level, they know that's true. That part of their mind is desperate for healing. For reintegrating with the part of humanity that their political journey divorced them from -- fundamentally, women. But, of course, they don't want to stop being radicals. They just want to win. So they invent the fantasy of the old enemy reimagined as a champion of their own values -- and yes, your point about them just replacing hope for a real woman with this hyperreal sexual fantasy ties the bow on this.

TL;DR : I wished you spent a little more time humanizing right-wing culture war stuff -- showing it in a human way as genuinely, profoundly sad. Not in a mocking or holier than thou kind of way -- just as a real, scary, cautionary tale. Check out Into the Manosophere by Louix Theroux -- he actually does a stellar job of this exact thing.

Source:
 
Dev claims all right wingers have the same beliefs
>Looks in AN
Lol, LMAO even.
Dev bans a user for saying they didn't like his 3-hour Amelia video.
Dev wants feedback on his videos and feels unsatisfied with his Amelia video.
You know... There's a really fascinating irony in the guy that made the "New Guy strawman" video now being incapable of recognizing a similar phenomena.

(Edit): Debiru, as I just said, I think Dev is overthinking. To me it comes off as another "Chud"/"New Guy" incident where the Left is so lost that they end up mocking an average dude or "based" ideal. This being from a even crazier point when in consideration the "bad" ending of the "game" being you gain a partner, friends, and family at the cost of ending up on a list.
 
Last edited:
Also, I haven't finished Dev's Amelia video since it's 10% about the topic and 90% sperging at his former friends over how they have betrayed hm. But at the same time, I believe this comment show how much Dev has fallen off and how his partisan dicksucking brings down legitimate criticism against the right wing. The commenter shows a factual flaw of using a cartoon as pillar of right-wing values, and why it's hard to take the right seriously sometimes. I figured I'd share it here before it gets lost when Dev tries to delete the video or move it somewhere else.
Literally the entire joke with Amelia is that the creators of the game made the most aesthetically wrong character to represent a racist nationalist stereotype. That's it. It's bizarre that "erm its just a joke guys"-man doesn't understand the joke and makes a long fucking video to show how much he doesn't get it.

"Twitter right-wingers co-oped the manic pixie dream girl erm how does this make sense erm?>???"
 
Literally the entire joke with Amelia is that the creators of the game made the most aesthetically wrong character to represent a racist nationalist stereotype. That's it. It's bizarre that "erm its just a joke guys"-man doesn't understand the joke and makes a long fucking video to show how much he doesn't get it.

"Twitter right-wingers co-oped the manic pixie dream girl erm how does this make sense erm?>???"

Exactly. You took the words right out of my mouth. Most of Amelia's popularity comes from the hard clash between what she looked like and the things she said. It perfectly showed off the insanity of the game and the UK government. It was literally a stereotypical alt-girl punk rocker from the early 2000s that they slapped nationalism on because the people making it literally don't understand anything and assumed that all rebels look the same. The absurdity of the punk rock girl advocating for traditional values and nationalism, when such opinions are nowadays more extreme and demonized than the punk rock positions of "fuck authority" back in the day.

Does dev really not understand this? Does he really not pick up on how the contradiction is part of what made Amelia a funny meme? The commenter equally fails to understand this, but at least they have a more charitable view of seeing it as a call for unity.
 
Also, I haven't finished Dev's Amelia video since it's 10% about the topic and 90% sperging at his former friends over how they have betrayed him. But at the same time, I believe this comment show how much Dev has fallen off and how his partisan dicksucking brings down legitimate criticism against the right wing. The commenter shows a factual flaw of using a cartoon as pillar of right-wing values, and why it's hard to take the right seriously sometimes. I figured I'd share it here before it gets lost when Dev tries to delete the video or move it somewhere else.
The only reason this post resonates with Dev (misunderstands the right from a place of hatred) is because it's written by another lefty faggot (misunderstands the right from a place of fake pity) and still presents the opportunity to shit on his opponents. People, former friends and viewers, have been arguing with him for years about how he attributes arguments to them that are not true. At best he will add new pychobabble to his double-down routine, if he even changes at all.
 
Exactly. You took the words right out of my mouth. Most of Amelia's popularity comes from the hard clash between what she looked like and the things she said. It perfectly showed off the insanity of the game and the UK government. It was literally a stereotypical alt-girl punk rocker from the early 2000s that they slapped nationalism on because the people making it literally don't understand anything and assumed that all rebels look the same. The absurdity of the punk rock girl advocating for traditional values and nationalism, when such opinions are nowadays more extreme and demonized than the punk rock positions of "fuck authority" back in the day.

Does dev really not understand this? Does he really not pick up on how the contradiction is part of what made Amelia a funny meme? The commenter equally fails to understand this, but at least they have a more charitable view of seeing it as a call for unity.
Not just a call for unity: Amelia imagery often centered around her holding a British flag, or in a rallying position. In that position, she is leading people to rise up against their government, one of the ultimate gambits one can take.

Dev doesn't believe in heroes, or standing up for that matter. Nick Shirley is not a literal hero, but he stuck out his neck and brought attention to a problem. With results. Dev does nothing but call Nick a liar, low IQ, mentally deficient and a bad researcher. Meanwhile, Dev tweets that it's moral to resist and harass government workers for the current fascist Trump administration, but he cannot call Renee Good or Alex Petti heroes: just innocent victims of evil.

Has Dev described anyone as a hero, or inspirational figure in the last half decade?
 
Not just a call for unity: Amelia imagery often centered around her holding a British flag, or in a rallying position. In that position, she is leading people to rise up against their government, one of the ultimate gambits one can take.

Dev doesn't believe in heroes, or standing up for that matter. Nick Shirley is not a literal hero, but he stuck out his neck and brought attention to a problem. With results. Dev does nothing but call Nick a liar, low IQ, mentally deficient and a bad researcher. Meanwhile, Dev tweets that it's moral to resist and harass government workers for the current fascist Trump administration, but he cannot call Renee Good or Alex Petti heroes: just innocent victims of evil.

Has Dev described anyone as a hero, or inspirational figure in the last half decade?
He's the type of subhuman who will be forgotten once this anomaly we live in passes. And it will pass, one way or the other.
 
Exactly. You took the words right out of my mouth. Most of Amelia's popularity comes from the hard clash between what she looked like and the things she said. It perfectly showed off the insanity of the game and the UK government. It was literally a stereotypical alt-girl punk rocker from the early 2000s that they slapped nationalism on because the people making it literally don't understand anything and assumed that all rebels look the same. The absurdity of the punk rock girl advocating for traditional values and nationalism, when such opinions are nowadays more extreme and demonized than the punk rock positions of "fuck authority" back in the day.

Does dev really not understand this? Does he really not pick up on how the contradiction is part of what made Amelia a funny meme? The commenter equally fails to understand this, but at least they have a more charitable view of seeing it as a call for unity
I for me at least I didn't find the clash in athletics the beauty of the meme, it was the incompetence of the left fumbling their strategy. They are so autisticly obsessed with optics that I am convinced making Amelia alt was deliberate.
They were making a game for middle and highschool aged boys and so many of them were oneshotted by lazy propaganda at that age that they thought they could be just as lazy. I'm almost positive that their thought process was to take our "danger hair" memes and package the ideas they don't like in a delivery system they were convinced young boys would reject on optics alone, Completely unaware or unwilling to admit that what made "danger hairs" unpalatable was always the attitude and the politics not the aesthetic.
 
I for me at least I didn't find the clash in athletics the beauty of the meme, it was the incompetence of the left fumbling their strategy. They are so autisticly obsessed with optics that I am convinced making Amelia alt was deliberate.
They were making a game for middle and highschool aged boys and so many of them were oneshotted by lazy propaganda at that age that they thought they could be just as lazy. I'm almost positive that their thought process was to take our "danger hair" memes and package the ideas they don't like in a delivery system they were convinced young boys would reject on optics alone, Completely unaware or unwilling to admit that what made "danger hairs" unpalatable was always the attitude and the politics not the aesthetic.
The funny thing is, IMO, the woman's aesthetic was very similar to that old "British punks fighting the system" stereotype. Which, "British punks fighting the system" has been a quintessential message for at least 40-something years, IMO. The UK Govt might well have just fallen back to that aesthetic for the "bad guy" just as much (if not more) as they fell back to "SJW colors."

Which, I'm not gonna lie, what teenage boy is not gonna go for the "punk rock girlfriend" over the "plain-jane girl"?
 
Dev claims all right wingers have the same beliefs, they just try to disguise it.

How he could say this post tranny supporter melt down over his own oppinion is absurd to the point of just plain old bad bait. Get new tactics. You're boring!

Dev says half of his response videos are done. He claims to still be friends with Arch.

Sadly this might be true. In one of the more recent Arch casts, Arch did say he wish he could have Dev back on. In Arch's defense, it was due to wanting some one to give the retarded take from the other side so he could have someone to bicker with. Not the strongest reasoning.

  • Dev says he hasn't released the trucker video since people are so mean about it. He thinks releasing it wouldn't kill the meme.

XD Man, do you deserve all the bad stuff happening to you, you fat retard. This isnt rocket science. You go around bragging about how much you love pissing people off, how you want to remove their rights, and being an all around disengenous tard? Yeah, of course everyone is going to be a dick to you. This is how you cann tell this tard has never had a real job. Not pissing people off on purpose is one of the first big lessons you learn at a job.

  • Dev leaves the stream for 10 minutes to throw up. He's not sure what caused the sickness, as he hasn't eaten anything all day. He thinks his house has some kind of disease going around.

It's the stress. The drug abuse probably doesnt help either. I mean lets be real, you go out of your way to piss everyone off to the point you isolate yourself from your support group, Constantly piss of the woman in your life, and spend all day arguing? Yeah, you;re going to get a certain level of stress. And thats not even mentioning the money issues form losing audiance or things that we have no clue about in the background that he doesnt talk about. For all we know Naomi is an abusive spouse thats fucking Dave in the background. It's not something going around. It's that being on high alert and ready for a fight all of the time has finnlay fucked his system.

And the drug abuse.

Shitlibs worship WW2 like it was Genesis and the fucking Big Bang. Literally the start of history for them.

Because it is. Nothing of note happened before. Pre world war two to a shit lib is like a T rex to a historian. At best its an amussing anecdote about how people mistaking it for something else, but aside from that it has nothing to do with their world.

The entire historical narrative around WW2 is such a shitshow

How anyone trusts history teachers after finding out this is beyond me.

Literally the entire joke with Amelia is that the creators of the game made the most aesthetically wrong character to represent a racist nationalist stereotype. That's it.

Most of Amelia's popularity comes from the hard clash between what she looked like and the things she said. It perfectly showed off the insanity of the game and the UK government. It was literally a stereotypical alt-girl punk rocker from the early 2000s

No, you're both wrong. Part of the reason she took off as a massive insperation is because the people taht made her are incompetant morons who have never even stopped to consider men as living creatures much less their sexuality.

The entire thing was made in that Memphis corperate art style in which only the most basic of vauge details important to a story gets expressed. Amelia is a vauge blobl of a person, meant only to exist for the sake of speaking to the charecter. That she has an appearance is only of tangental importance.

But, being absolute tards, they never realized or heard of a simple fact of male sexuality. A woman is always ten times sexier when dressed than when naked. Why? Because the implications of details and imagination will always be much more satisfying than reality.

They basically made the perfect canvas for every horny man in the western hemisphere to project their ideal details on to and then made that canvas agree with the horny men. They said "Bitch has purple hair, is a woman that wears clothes, and has a collar. You fill in the rest. Oh and FYI, she agrees with you and approached and talked to you and wants to hang out with you. Please make sure you hate her." And it blew up in their faces and it's amazing to laugh at.
 
View attachment 8780088
Okay, Dev. Surely this is a good faith argument that Dev actually believes.
Is this in response to him revoking LBJs EO creating birthright citizenship? Because if so the supreme court has no authority to tell him jack shit about that, they can stop a new EO from going through based on its constitutionality, but they cant stop him from revoking an existing EO. That's the point even having them in the first place, to give the president certain powers that are outside of the control of congress and the courts.
 
Is this in response to him revoking LBJs EO creating birthright citizenship? Because if so the supreme court has no authority to tell him jack shit about that, they can stop a new EO from going through based on its constitutionality, but they cant stop him from revoking an existing EO. That's the point even having them in the first place, to give the president certain powers that are outside of the control of congress and the courts.
Its about the EO Trump gave to stop citizenship for the children of illegal aliens
 
Its about the EO Trump gave to stop citizenship for the children of illegal aliens
Yeah that's the one, birthright citizenship was a EO by LBJ that deliberately misinterpreted the constitution. it was never passed into law and the supreme court can't stop Trump from repealing a EO even if they wanted to. I'm guessing that this new ruling is probably just the court agreeing that the constitution says what it written on the page and bad faith Dems cant just interpret it to mean whatever the fuck they want on this issue.
 
Back
Top Bottom