Did You Know. . .

[Miss Tommie Jayne Wasserberg]

Animals and children.
He who does once proves he can do it again.

no it doesn't, you delusional derp.

 

[RadioactiveMonkeyMan]

no, that's proof of your misinterpretation of things i said , but do go on, you stupid colonized butcher bitch.

So you admit that it's our interpretation of events you described, and therefore an opinion that we are stating? Bam, case dismissed.

 

[Tragi-Chan]

...i didn't know she was only 14 until her 15th birthday. i thought it was going to be her 19th".

don't be making up shit that i never wrote.

So you did know she was below the age of consent when you attempted sexual intercourse with the minor under discussion. No further questions, Your Honour.

Can you please explain to me why something that happened forty years ago of such lack of harm

Prove it. Your story on what happened to Sabrina keeps changing.

is so important for you to all be analyzing this so thoroughly now? What relevance is it to anything about me today? Same thing with helping my dog get off. What does that have to do with the things I'm doing today?
.

I don’t know, Tom, you’re the one who started babbling about them on the Internet decades afterwards. That’s the only reason we know about any of this. Why don’t you tell us?

I'm asking what evidence do you have that i still do that? judging me for something so inconsequential that happened before you were born doesn't seem dysfunctional to you?

We’ll decide what’s inconsequential, fat boy.

who benefits besides you?

That’s enough for me.

 

[Mellow Malevolent]

I'm asking what evidence do you have that i still do that? judging me for something so inconsequential that happened before you were born doesn't seem dysfunctional to you? who benefits besides you?

Anyone who learns to avoid people like you. Like, for instance, the Rainbow Family that saw how you were inappropriate with minors and kicked you out. It's not just the Sabrina story Tom, that one's just the most blatant example.

What about when you were talking about Lady, your dog, and you mentioned yet another teenaged runaway that you were apparently living with? You might be too stuck in dementia to realize the pattern you're presenting, but we aren't.

 

[Tragi-Chan]

no, that's proof of your misinterpretation of things i said , but do go on, you stupid colonized butcher bitch.

What’s the correct interpretation, then? Bearing in mind that we already pointed out the many, many flaws in your argument about helping trans teens escape abusive households.

 

[O.O]

no, that's proof of your misinterpretation of things i said , but do go on, you stupid colonized butcher bitch.

 

[RadioactiveMonkeyMan]

View attachment 2824209

I'll say this, you keep posting it and yeah, maybe it's overdone... but somehow it's always fucking relevant and it makes me laugh. Kudos, and same to @Hongourable Madisha. You really made a thing of beauty there!

 

[Uncle Buck]

that doesn't qualify as pedophilia. she wasn't pre-pubescent.

You still don't get it.

Yes, the term you are so hung up on means a certain thing, clinically - it's true.

In common, everyday usage, it's used synonymous - and, I'm not denying, inaccurately - with, "child molester", "child abuser" et al.

As an illustration, do a web search for the terms "Epstein" and "convicted pedophile". News outlets have referred to Jeffrey Epstein as a "convicted pedophile" countless times over the past few years, despite the fact that, clinically, "pedophilia" is a state of mind and an indicator of attraction and not something for which an individual can, in and of itself, be "convicted".

Oh, and with maybe one exception out of his dozens of alleged victims, they were older than fourteen.

In the clinical sense, Jeffrey Epstein is not a "pedophile". And you know what? Not even Epstein himself would have tried to deflect by arguing the point.

 

[I am vomit]

I'm asking what evidence do you have that i still do that? judging me for something so inconsequential that happened before you were born doesn't seem dysfunctional to you? who benefits besides you?

The fact that it happened at any point is the issue here. You don't stop being a pedophile suddenly one day.

 

[Miss Tommie Jayne Wasserberg]

So you admit that it's our interpretation of events you described, and therefore an opinion that we are stating? Bam, case dismissed.

i don't think any of you will understand how wrong you are until a bunch of people are arrested.

The fact that it happened at any point is the issue here. You don't stop being a pedophile suddenly one day.

My point is that i never started being a pedophile by an legitimate definition of the term, fool. what i "admit" to isn't even remotely pedophilia.

 

[RadioactiveMonkeyMan]

i don't think any of you will understand how wrong you are until a bunch of people are arrested.


My point is that i never started being a pedophile by an legitimate definition of the term, fool. what i "admit" to isn't even remotely pedophilia.

You know every time you respond you just dig a deeper pit. I'll concede you might not be a clinical pedophile.

You're still a serial molester.

 

[Miss Tommie Jayne Wasserberg]

So you did know she was below the age of consent when you attempted sexual intercourse with the minor under discussion. No further questions, Your Honour.

Prove it. Your story on what happened to Sabrina keeps changing.

I don’t know, Tom, you’re the one who started babbling about them on the Internet decades afterwards. That’s the only reason we know about any of this. Why don’t you tell us?

We’ll decide what’s inconsequential, fat boy.

That’s enough for me.

Can you tell me how what you think is consequential defending yourself against conspiracy to harass and intimidate by electronic means is going to be anything but incriminating? What you think your justification is for invading my privacy and besmirching my good name has nothing to do with the complaint , idiot savant.

 

[Abu Muslim]

Can you tell me how what you think is consequential defending yourself against conspiracy to harass and intimidate by electronic means is going to be anything but incriminating? What you think your justification is for invading my privacy and besmirching my good name has nothing to do with the complaint , idiot savant.

You are the one who chooses to come here in the first place...

The only logical explanation I can gather from that behavior is the need for sexual pleasure derived from masochism...

And calling others idiot savants is supposed to be an insult? Do you even know what that is?

 

[D_Tractor]

@Miss Tommie Jayne Wasserberg
I have done that many times in Walmart and never got kicked out. You have to do something a lot worse to get kicked out of WalMart. What did you actually do to get kicked out? Don't lie this time, maam.

 

[Owlflaps]

Can you tell me how what you think is consequential defending yourself against conspiracy to harass and intimidate by electronic means is going to be anything but incriminating? What you think your justification is for invading my privacy and besmirching my good name has nothing to do with the complaint , idiot savant.

1. ) You're a pedophile retard

2.) No one's invading your privacy when you voluntarily put up all your info on the internet for all to see, pedophile retard

3.) You're willingly interacting with the farms. That doesn't fall under intimidation or harassment, you pedophile retard

4.) Mean words on the internet is not criminal activity nor intent. To that end, I'm exercising my freedom of speech by calling you a pedophile retard

 

[Abu Muslim]

@Miss Tommie Jayne Wasserberg
I have done that many times in Walmart and never got kicked out. You have to do something a lot worse to get kicked out of WalMart. What did you actually do to get kicked out? Don't lie this time, maam.

Probably what's described in the OP if I had to guess...

 

[EmpireOfTheClouds]

no, that's proof of your misinterpretation of things i said , but do go on, you stupid colonized butcher bitch.

Literally you saying it out loud. But go on, you stupid colonized butcher bitch.

 

[Easy J]

I'm asking what evidence do you have that i still do that? judging me for something so inconsequential that happened before you were born doesn't seem dysfunctional to you? who benefits besides you?

You seem to be dragging the goalposts from "what proof do you have" for the 1,000th time to "well...what relevance does this have to me now", as if anyone owes you an answer for anything, ever.

You're an admitted pedophilic, dog molesting hobo and will be justly ripped on for this anywhere it becomes known. If you don't like this, fuck off and take your attention-whoring elsewhere. Or kill yourself. That would work even better. In fact, scratch the fucking off part and just move straight to being dead ASAP.

 

[Trigger Me Timbers]

you don't know what a pedo is. you're an intellectually incompetent imbecile too stupid to argue with me rationally. insult me some more, genius. keep wallpapering your broken brain with hatred for me, fool.

When you were touching that girl against her will, if the police barged in and arrested you, what do you think the charge be?

 

[RadioactiveMonkeyMan]

When you were touching that girl against her will, if the police barged in and arrested you, what do you think the charge be?

child molestation.
What?
CHILD MOLESTATION.