The biggest issue I see is she moved to California. I'm not sure if she would be willing to go back to Oklahoma to fight her autist ex.Just out of curiosity if this were to happen (and hopefully it doesn’t) wouldn’t Taylor be able to press charges?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The biggest issue I see is she moved to California. I'm not sure if she would be willing to go back to Oklahoma to fight her autist ex.Just out of curiosity if this were to happen (and hopefully it doesn’t) wouldn’t Taylor be able to press charges?
Why would she, she could just say Dillin is a bitch ass motherfucker and leave it to die. There is no reason for her to press charges, and if she did, the charges would be dropped as I don't think any legal case could be made against Dillin. I am by no means a legal expert, but I know for sure that the legal system, no matter the state, would have no problem throwing it out.Just out of curiosity if this were to happen (and hopefully it doesn’t) wouldn’t Taylor be able to press charges?
I don't particularly understand why sex with a 16 year old is that interesting. Can someone explain why that is? In my country the age of consent is 16 so they can consent to sex with anyone of any age 16+, 15 year olds are given a 4-year difference allowance.Dillin should of look into age of consent laws before this shit he try to pull and got rightfully mocked
I'll be the first to say, different countries have different rules because of different situations. With that in mind, 16 actually is the age of consent in multiple US states. AFAIK, there's rules attached to it (like you can't be the 16 year old's teacher, boss, ect), but its a myth that the age of consent is 18 everywhere here. I still don't think anyone 20 and over should be sleeping with 16 year old, but that's mostly because 20 year olds should be at the point in their lives where their interests should be radically different from a 16 year old.I don't particularly understand why sex with a 16 year old is that interesting. Can someone explain why that is? In my country the age of consent is 16 so they can consent to sex with anyone of any age 16+, 15 year olds are given a 4-year difference allowance.
Also I want to say that in my country older adults that sleep with teens (16-19) are considered creepy and weird but it is not a criminal offense.
Even further proof that Dillin doesn't do ANY research at all! This Dillin guy just touts his own feelings and opinions as if they are laws that should be enforced! Which state does the Candi girl live in?its a myth that the age of consent is 18 everywhere
Jesse is a degenerate and a weirdo, double confirmed. But Candi was not a minor upon having sex. If this is indeed her, then she at 16 according to Arkansas age of consent would have been fair game. But if Jesse was 24 then he is still a creep for going through with this. So is that the point Dillin is trying to make, that Jesse is a sex pest? We know. It's frankly just not that interesting to me.I'll be the first to say, different countries have different rules because of different situations. With that in mind, 16 actually is the age of consent in multiple US states. AFAIK, there's rules attached to it (like you can't be the 16 year old's teacher, boss, ect), but its a myth that the age of consent is 18 everywhere here. I still don't think anyone 20 and over should be sleeping with 16 year old, but that's mostly because 20 year olds should be at the point in their lives where their interests should be radically different from a 16 year old.
Typically, 20 year olds should be worried about working or going to higher education so they can pay bills. A 16 year old is still in highschool talking about fortnite and BTS. There's no reason for a 20 year old to be fucking a 16 year old, but I'd say that's my American mindset talking.
Being a sex pest doesn't make one a pedo, Dillin.Jesse is a degenerate and a weirdo, double confirmed. But Candi was not a minor upon having sex. If this is indeed her, then she at 16 according to Arkansas age of consent would have been fair game. But if Jesse was 24 then he is still a creep for going through with this. So is that the point Dillin is trying to make, that Jesse is a sex pest? We know. It's frankly just not that interesting to me.
View attachment 2811681
People have weird and messed up sex kinks. It’s gross but some people have it and I don’t like it but people are allowed to do itBeing a sex pest doesn't make one a pedo, Dillin.
While this is the legal case, Dillin intends to push the moral outlook on this situation as to cause moral outrage about an once channel collaborator now a sexual predator. Sex pest puts what Dillin wants to put out to his audience lightly, he fully intends to call Jesse a predator no matter the cost because he knows his viewers believe that the age of consent should be 18, as does he. Law doesn't translate well to morals and this is one of those cases.Jesse is a degenerate and a weirdo, double confirmed. But Candi was not a minor upon having sex. If this is indeed her, then she at 16 according to Arkansas age of consent would have been fair game. But if Jesse was 24 then he is still a creep for going through with this. So is that the point Dillin is trying to make, that Jesse is a sex pest? We know. It's frankly just not that interesting to me.
View attachment 2811681
It’s nothing but a joke can’t he do it after the holidaysApparently, there are some now deleted tweets from Dillin saying every day until Christmas he's going to post another Jesse video, with Christmas Day having him stream all the evidence together as well as putting in some screenshots.
It's fucking sad, to spend Christmas alone making nonsense videos about Jesse instead of spending it with your friends and family... Spending a day of love and togetherness at his computer grumbling and bitter...
Well Dillin, while your doing that, we will enjoy the gifts that you keep giving us.
LOL! As if Dillin had any superior morals to anybody. This faggot is entirely literally lying about people being minors and child porn! He's acting entirely out of spite just to fulfil some kind of personal vendetta, and he's exploiting others in order to do it! Dillin has the least morality out of anyone in this situation!While this is the legal case, Dillin intends to push the moral outlook on this situation as to cause moral outrage about an once channel collaborator now a sexual predator. Sex pest puts what Dillin wants to put out to his audience lightly, he fully intends to call Jesse a predator no matter the cost because he knows his viewers believe that the age of consent should be 18, as does he. Law doesn't translate well to morals and this is one of those cases.
That's the thing, he's using the morals of his audience to go after Jesse. At this point, he's not just posing his own morality, he's propagating others morality. To be honest, the personal vendetta isn't too farfetched of an idea as sighted within the original video that started this whole debacle as Dillin stated that, "Jesse had fucked me over multiple times." I am not saying this what his intentions are when carrying out this, for lack of a better word attack, but so far this seems to be likely case.LOL! As if Dillin had any superior morals to anybody. This faggot is entirely literally lying about people being minors and child porn! He's acting entirely out of spite just to fulfil some kind of personal vendetta, and he's exploiting others in order to do it! Dillin has the least morality out of anyone in this situation!
Looking further into this, Dillin who apparently lives in Tulsa, Oklahoma, should be acustomed to 16 being the age of no longer being considered a minor for sex, so he is either just an uninformed idiot that didn't bother to look it up, or he's blatantly lying out of his ass purposefully. Dillin had to have known we were going to fact check his claims, right? Was he truthfully banking on the concept of everyone taking his word for it?Being a sex pest doesn't make one a pedo, Dillin.
Yeah I think this is correct.That's the thing, he's using the morals of his audience to go after Jesse. At this point, he's not posing his own morality, he's propagating others morality. To be honest, the personal vendetta isn't too farfetched of an idea as sighted within the original video that started this whole debacle as Dillin stated that, "Jesse had fucked me over multiple times." I am not saying this what his intentions are when carrying out this, for lack of a better word attack, but so far this seems to be likely case.
Apparently, there are some now deleted tweets from Dillin saying every day until Christmas he's going to post another Jesse video, with Christmas Day having him stream all the evidence together as well as putting in some screenshots.
It's fucking sad, to spend Christmas alone making nonsense videos about Jesse instead of spending it with your friends and family... Spending a day of love and togetherness at his computer grumbling and bitter...
Well Dillin, while your doing that, we will enjoy the gifts that you keep giving us.
He is either lying or at least being willfully ignorant since he has showcased he can do extensive research on the age of consent in other countries. He’s trying his best to incriminate Jesse to his audience since he knows he hasn’t actually broken any laws regarding the age of consent. This idiot has to realize that by purposefully dragging this out and posting the above tweets he has exposed himself as doing this for only two reasons:Looking further into this, Dillin who apparently lives in Tulsa, Oklahoma, should be acustomed to 16 being the age of no longer being considered a minor for sex, so he is either just an uninformed idiot that didn't bother to look it up, or he's blatantly lying out of his ass purposefully. Dillin had to have known we were going to fact check his claims, right? Was he truthfully banking on the concept of everyone taking his word for it?
Yeah I think this is correct.
You mean these?
View attachment 2812733