Opinion Disney Erasing Trans Stories Is A Symbol Of Our Regression

Link (Archive)

Disney Erasing Trans Stories Is A Symbol Of Our Regression​

It feels like we are regressing as a society when it comes to LGBTQ rights. Here in the UK, the Labour government recently upheld a ban on puberty blockers for transgender kids under the age of eighteen, while debates about trans athletes dominated the Olympics, despite no trans person competing. Our general existence has become a political punching bag. It sucks, and as a trans person, it can be hard to keep going sometimes.

But you turn this anger into hope, and remain confident that there are more good people in this world than bad who either don’t think much about transgender people living their lives (the vast majority), or do all they can to support them. We also search for purpose and representation in popular culture, which for younger audiences normally means the shows they watch, video games they play, and people they follow online. There is plenty of positive queer reinforcement to be found, but again and again, the biggest corporations on the planet have made it clear we are nothing more than a demographic to be taken advantage of.

Pixar And Disney Are Once Again Silencing Transgender Stories​

Last month I wrote about an episode of Marvel’s Moon Girl and Devil Dinosaur that was due to air but was pulled following the US election due to its focus on a supporting transgender character being rejected by a transphobic volleyball team coach. It is a story that clearly acts as commentary on the grim situation regarding trans people in sports right now, which has surfaced time and time again as a reason to demonise a minority group, accusing what is such a miniscule percentage of athletes in the first place of transitioning merely so they can compete in the opposing gender sports with a better chance of winning. It is nonsense.

The team behind Moon Girl knows this, and spends much of the (cancelled, then leaked) episode exploring how this assumption has become the source of despair for so many transgender people, especially teenagers trying to embrace their true identity only to be pulled into a culture war they want no part in. Much like reality though, she isn’t alone and has the support of cis friends who are willing to see this character for who they are and face up against the forces of prejudice.

It is a story of good versus evil that thousands of kids' shows have explored to great effect, but because this one happens to revolve around a trans kid competing in sports, Disney decided to pull it from any form of potential release. Whether this decision was made because of the subject matter has not been confirmed, but you only need to read between the lines to acknowledge the reason.

This was disappointing, speaking to a stifling of queer stories that, for Disney, is sadly routine at this point. Reports claimed that Pixar wanted to ensure there was no way audiences could interpret Riley as queer in Inside Out 2, while countless films from Star Wars to Pixar to Marvel have scenes of representation edited out for certain international markets.

A few years ago it felt Disney was making strides in the right direction with shows like The Owl House and Amphibia, but as I’d cover them and speak with the talented creators behind each one, it was clear that much of this queerness was made possible by the people in the trenches, while those sitting safely in boardrooms considered this representation expendable whether it stood in the way of profits. Alex Hirsch, creator of Gravity Falls, summed up this artistic frustration best.

Win Or Lose Was Set To Tell A Trans Story That Could Have Changed Lives​

Pixar’s Win or Lose is set to debut in February 2025 and will follow a middle school softball team called Pickles, and its many members from different backgrounds. Designed to represent a range of life experiences for people both young and old, each 20-minute episode follows not just an individual member of the team, but the people around them who help bring it to life and support it. From a foundational level, I can see how a show like this could easily facilitate a story about a transgender kid figuring out who they are. Once upon a time, it was going to do just that.

Earlier this week, The Hollywood Reporterreported that a transgender story and associated dialogue had been pulled from the series, with a Disney spokesperson telling the outlet that:

“When it comes to animated content for a younger audience, we recognize that many parents would prefer to discuss certain subjects with their children on their own terms and timeline.”

The scene in question, storyboards of which have since leaked online, follows a character as they are debating whether they should use the male or female restroom. After checking their appearance and anxiously struggling to make a choice, their friend approaches and takes them into the women’s bathroom. To them, this arbitrary decision isn’t a big deal, because in ideal circumstances it wouldn’t be. Trans people should be free to use the bathroom they require and not be viewed as some sort of boogeyman waiting to break the law. But this has become such a common point of discussion that it’s impossible to avoid.

Once inside the bathroom, the character stares at herself in the mirror with confidence in a brief moment of euphoria where she has stepped into a public place in which she belongs. But after helping a younger child turn on a tap to clean their hands, she is stared at like the aforementioned boogeyman. Somebody who should be ashamed for daring to intrude upon this space. After looking in the mirror, their reflection changes into an expressionist slate of different shapes and sizes, cracking to pieces as if to represent her crumbling confidence, and inability to ever see herself as whole. They rush out in a panic, unsure what to do, until their Dad rings their mobile phone and asks how they are. Even in animatic form, it’s such a powerful moment, and one of unfortunate normalcy in the lives of trans people everywhere.

But Now It Is Being Hidden For No Good Reason​

After speaking with her father and sitting down with her coach to talk about everything she is going through, our unnamed character’s face begins to come back together, signifying once again that she feels safe in both her identity and surroundings. It’s a scene of dysphoria told through animation that has so much to say, and could have changed lives for young viewers who previously had no way to put this kind of experience into words. Now it’s been silenced.

I’ve been chased out of public bathrooms before during the early stages of my transition, either having to rush out to avoid confrontation or asking friends for help. I did nothing wrong, but it unfortunately reinforces the fact that we live in a world where trans people are still viewed as outsiders.

When stories like this are taken away out of political fear, it makes it harder and harder for young people to find solace in who they are and what they are going through. Disney’s hollow statement that parents would rather have these conversations with their children at the right time or place is cowardice, making a lot of dangerous assumptions that all LGBTQ+ children will be in an environment where it is even safe to do so.

I grew up in a world where queer representation was often expressed through subtext and stereotypes, but as an adult, watching things improve warms my heart. I hate to see how things are starting to regress in the current political climate, but progress continues nonetheless.

Representation like this is so important because it can be a voice for the voiceless. A light in the distance that a random kid might stumble upon one random evening and suddenly watch as the dots connect for the first time ever. A moment of recognition, or a reminder that they’re not alone and stories are being told about them on some of the biggest stages in the world. But when a corporation is willing to hide those stories away in fear of retaliation, it marks a bitter point of no return, and the more it happens, the more we have cause to worry.

Transgender actor Chanel Stewart, who plays the character in question, spoke to Deadlineabout being informed about the censorship of their role, and how they will now be presented as a cisgender teenager with no queer affiliation. The casting call initially asked for someone who could embody an authentic transgender experience, showing us that the plan was to tell this story the entire time. But the current climate has Disney running scared, and people like Stewart, and the young people she speaks for, are going to suffer.

Stewart’s character is still part of the show, but what she stood for, and the role she was asked to play alongside the story Win or Lose intended to tell, has been set aside by a corporation more eager to protect its capitalist interests than represent the audiences it claims to stand up for. This isn’t the first time a queer story has been censored by someone like Disney, and looking at the current landscape, it unfortunately won’t be the last.
 
I've never liked the idea of a corporation virtue signalling stuff like going carbon neutral or donating percentages of profits to charity.

Like it seems like a convenient way to bandage one's social guilt while still indulging in ordinary capitalist materialism, all in one shot. Which is fine I guess when you agree with the big corporation. But what if you don't, like with the troon issue? What if it's some goofy issue that you strongly oppose, and all the corporations are strangely in lock step over it? Again, like with the troon issue?

Why do corporations need to have opinions on these issues to begin with?

Frankly I'm burnt out on the concept of charitable capitalism.

I just want my dealings with businesses to be 100% soulless, transactional interactions.

If there truly is a huge social/environmental/whatever issue that I suddenly care about, then I'm perfectly capable of seeking out a non-profit and donating to them independently. Or if it's a big enough issue, we can lobby our legislators to pass a law.

Honestly, I just want my businesses to be businesses again. I have money, you do the thing or sell me the thing. That's it.
If corpos want to have opinions or positions, so be it. The problem starts when you can tell they're in some sort of cahoots with either the government or foreign NGOs in order to promote an agenda, which is the case with most current corpos, Blackrock, and all of that.
 
The bit about how this is a sign of "our regression" (I assume they mean as a society) kinda pisses me off. Progress to these narcissistic ass-wipes is only when things are going the way they want, they're getting the things they want, and only the policies they agree with are being put forth. No, that's not the way it works. Society is worse off now because of those things. Society regressed because of LGBT bullshit and multiculturalism be put in everything. Society is more than just you and your butt-buddies and what you want.
 
Trump won the popular vote because of non-whites getting sick of all the tranny shit targeting children. Only white Karens and Jews demanding tranny nonsense.
White Karens are also rejecting it. It was fashionable for while when it was a gay marriage 2.0 but now that it actually affects Karen herself and her kids it's just not fun anymore. It was fine when it was about other people and their kids but Karens don't want to share bathrooms with hons, see their daughters loosing in sports to a looser male or be demonized when trying to prevented her confused child from destroying their body with surgery and cross sex hormones.
 
What's a "trans story?" Creeping on women in the bathroom?

The draft of the "Win or Lose" scene was posted on Bluesky by troons currently weeping about how positive and affirming it is. It's literally a male teenager using the women's bathroom, and then finding himself alone with a little girl, who is startled by his presence:
1.png

The viewer is supposed to empathize with the crossdressing male teenager in this scene.
 
I had a friend who's a leftist who had a rant about this some years ago when the first businesses here started to pander to the LGBT. A lot of people were praising one of them for the change of heart and support during Pride, but he said they were only doing it now that's socially acceptable and still we didn't have gay marriage or any constitutional acknowledging of gays rights and the only groups benefiting from it were the companies using it as PR. He was the type of leftist that hated corpos in general and I disagree on the need for constitutional gay rights, but he was right. Corpos don't care. They only want to make profit from it. Now that the upcoming government is wary about trans, they are dropping them because they never cared.
I think corpos care about politicking as far as how financially secure they are. Biden administration Disney would have 100% got a bailout if anything gone wrong, while Trump would be far less likely to do it

With Trump having the popular vote and small competitors taking a bite, Disney would at least dual down the politics.

Mind you, the Overton window is still way to the left and gay dads/moms and interracial romance is here to stay.
 
Oh dear. Well, maybe a New Year’s resolution to Cope, Seethe and Dilate?
Merry Christmas to all !
 
Corpos don't care.
I know the kind of people who drive Priuses but will gladly shill for Lexus if they have a commercial about girls succeeding or some shit.

Make that make sense.

I just want my dealings with businesses to be 100% soulless, transactional interactions.
I have actively provided customer feedback to companies that want to virtue signal with me that I am not a captive audience to their political positions.

I give you money, you give me a service. That's it. I am not interested in how righteous or invested in social justice they are.
 

"If you have a problem, you get to be the one to leave."

Well... yeah. A lot of people have been leaving, and Disney is losing money because of it. Disney doesn't want people to leave anymore, so they are removing the problem.

I always love when they crow about how people should "just leave" or "don't buy it" and then cry when troon shit loses money.


"beautiful and empathic depiction of gender dysphoria... by trans creators"

We could tell the scene was created by troons, because the only empathy granted by the writers was directed towards the male troon. Everyone else (in this case, the scared little girl in the bathroom) was reduced to an unimportant one-dimensional prop in order to advance the troon's inner journey as a crossdresser. Surprise surprise, no one but other AGPs likes that shit.

How the fuck did the kid get shit on her cast, and on her mouth?!

I think it's supposed to be orange juice (she's holding a juice box), but given the troon involvement, you never know.
 
I had a friend who's a leftist who had a rant about this some years ago when the first businesses here started to pander to the LGBT. A lot of people were praising one of them for the change of heart and support during Pride, but he said they were only doing it now that's socially acceptable and still we didn't have gay marriage or any constitutional acknowledging of gays rights and the only groups benefiting from it were the companies using it as PR. He was the type of leftist that hated corpos in general and I disagree on the need for constitutional gay rights, but he was right. Corpos don't care. They only want to make profit from it. Now that the upcoming government is wary about trans, they are dropping them because they never cared.
What chaps my geriatric ass is that for most of my life that was the default setting. If you were a Leftist, you were against big business, big banks, and big tycoons. Then, after Occupy Wall Street, everybody started shucking and jiving every time a multinational corporation put a goddamned rainbow in its logo to celebrate this week's latest fashionable perversion. We went from fighting for equal rights to worrying about whether or not Disney had enough demisexual genderfluid Latinx 2spirit representation in their movies.

Hopefully this will serve as a wakeup call to these idiots and we can get back to building guillotines and beheading CEOs instead of lisping about problematic Xeets and microaggressions.
 
Wow it's almost like Disney, Pixar, BlackRock, Coca-Cola, General Motors and everyone else doesn't actually give a shit about you as a person and just wants you to make them more money, and they will happily throw you under a bus as soon as you stop giving them money.

It must be shocking to find out that simply because a Twitter account says "yay fag rights", the faceless corporate machine behind it is not automatically your (or anyone else's) friend.
 
Trump won the popular vote because of non-whites getting sick of all the tranny shit targeting children. Only white Karens and Jews demanding tranny nonsense.
From my experience online, it feels like the only people who support transgenderism are a bunch of teenagers and impressionable young people. Seriously, the amount of grooming being done to these kids is insane because they are the only group that gives a shit about trans rights.
I'm not LGB but this force teaming needs to die already. Yes, a gay couple holding hands is totally the same thing as encouraging mentally unstable teenagers that they can become the opposite sex if they pump their bodies with chemicals and mutilate their genitals. Deluding teenagers that all of their mental health problems will go away if they force people to validate your lies and delusions is totally the same thing as some gay people holding hands. Good grief
 
There is plenty of positive queer reinforcement to be found, but again and again, the biggest corporations on the planet have made it clear we are nothing more than a demographic to be taken advantage of.

Jesus H. Christ on a crutch, what the hell ever gave you the idea that the biggest corporations on the planet were ever going to think of you as anything else?
They forgot about the concept of pinkwashing, which is the only reason corporations give a shit about LGBTQ to begin with.

If being racist was profitable, they'd do that, too. Whitey was terrified of their home value tanking due to darkies moving into their neighborhood, after all.
Wow it's almost like Disney, Pixar, BlackRock, Coca-Cola, General Motors and everyone else doesn't actually give a shit about you as a person and just wants you to make them more money, and they will happily throw you under a bus as soon as you stop giving them money.

It must be shocking to find out that simply because a Twitter account says "yay fag rights", the faceless corporate machine behind it is not automatically your (or anyone else's) friend.
That became apparent to anyone paying attention during pride month when looking at the social media of corporations in countries that hate gays. The people whining about Disney not catering to them aren't intelligent enough to make that connection.

That's also why they're still Disney fans.
From my experience online, it feels like the only people who support transgenderism are a bunch of teenagers and impressionable young people. Seriously, the amount of grooming being done to these kids is insane because they are the only group that gives a shit about trans rights.

I'm not LGB but this force teaming needs to die already. Yes, a gay couple holding hands is totally the same thing as encouraging mentally unstable teenagers that they can become the opposite sex if they pump their bodies with chemicals and mutilate their genitals. Deluding teenagers that all of their mental health problems will go away if they force people to validate your lies and delusions is totally the same thing as some gay people holding hands. Good grief
It's definitely a mental illness. When I hear about the shit trans-identified people say, it reminds me of what my mother told me about people with some eating disorders; they think if they just lose more and more weight, all their problems will go away. Replace "lose more and more weight" with "get a surgery that promises something that's biologically impossible" and you have troonism.
 
Last edited:
Back