Disney General - The saddest fandom on Earth

  • Thread starter Thread starter KO 864
  • Start date Start date
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Which is Better

  • Chicken Little

    Votes: 433 27.4%
  • Hunchback 2

    Votes: 57 3.6%
  • A slow death

    Votes: 1,088 68.9%

  • Total voters
    1,578
I'll say it again...should have been a puppet stitch
Disney can’t even be fucked to bring in a real dog these days, you think they’ll put in that much effort?
IMG_6549.webp
 
thing is, TS5 is gonna have to fix that fucking ending without being a complete cop-out or admitting 4 is filler/non-existent. Difficulty spike is high.
The thing about TS is the creeping spike of technology that has been and is making toys irrelevant. Like by now Bonnie would've had her mom throw out her toys so she can play with a tablet and watch Tiktoks. I feel like TS5 is gonna address that, which is why it really should've ended with 3. In 2010 people still played with toys and not everyone had a smartphone.
The Toy Story franchise (which I am not watching more of after the terrible fourth one) is just funny at this point. There's only so many big dramatic totally final for real ends you can have before it becomes comical. And you know they're going to do it again because they can't just have a nice ending where everyone is together like Toy Story 2 after all the praise for the dramatic ones.

They could end this fifth one with all of them actually burning to ashes and I would feel nothing because I know there's definitely a sixth in development already and that'll have its own definitely real ending before the seventh...
Pixar should just go all out. Have toys go batshit insane and rebel and attack humans for centuries of mistreatment and neglect. Toys take over the entire planet but struggle to run power plants or maintain infrastructure.
 
my dude The Magic was dead like, halfway through Eisner's run and I can even believe he sincerely tried to keep it alive however pedowood he was

Eisner wasn't as bad as Iger and Chapek. I'll gladly die on this hill.
And there's the difference. Eisner took a lot of the shine off the "Disney Magic" with all of the low cost sequel/straight to VHS crap but did it on the basis of that being the best (least worst) option to keep a failing company afloat. Iger on the other hand had a successful company and sacrificed it on the altar of his political ambitions/personal politics. Chapek; well Chapek was never really in charge. He was appointed to be Iger's personal scapegoat and the first time he was foolish enough to forget Iger's hand was firmly wedged up his anal cavity (when he dared to try to move Disney away from "modern day" politics) he was eliminated with an efficiency and brutality that had Stalin nodding with approval from the depths of Hell.
 
And there's the difference. Eisner took a lot of the shine off the "Disney Magic" with all of the low cost sequel/straight to VHS crap but did it on the basis of that being the best (least worst) option to keep a failing company afloat. Iger on the other hand had a successful company and sacrificed it on the altar of his political ambitions/personal politics. Chapek; well Chapek was never really in charge. He was appointed to be Iger's personal scapegoat and the first time he was foolish enough to forget Iger's hand was firmly wedged up his anal cavity (when he dared to try to move Disney away from "modern day" politics) he was eliminated with an efficiency and brutality that had Stalin nodding with approval from the depths of Hell.
Iger also bought up a ton of IPs turning it into a huge soulless corporate abomination that sucks in and spagettifies every good IP it touches or happened to previously create, as storyboards are run by commitee and not heart or creativity. Under his command he helped shut down the traditional animation department that virtually created Disney and made it the company many people think of when it comes to childhood nostalgia, while LucasArts also got shuttered losing a lot of potentially quality games.

Eisner might have had his flaws, but they didn't make people hate Disney.
 
1746822885826.webp
this is the remake perfectly summed up in one photo. Stitch....chilling?! Again, completely antithetical to his character. Not to mention how he barely looks like he's actually there. And """Lilo"""" looks bored out of her mind, not even smiling or looking at Stitch (because that would "ruin the illusion").
 
View attachment 7340951
this is the remake perfectly summed up in one photo. Stitch....chilling?! Again, completely antithetical to his character. Not to mention how he barely looks like he's actually there. And """Lilo"""" looks bored out of her mind, not even smiling or looking at Stitch (because that would "ruin the illusion").
Sad.
 
Say that it has nothing to do with the Dynamics the family has, and more so that Disney just doesn't know how to write compelling lead characters anymore.

Most of their characters currently just stay stagnant and it's everything else around them that changes which makes for a boring watch because the characters don't really have to rise to the challenge.

That's something that define the Renaissance particularly because they follow the classic heroes tale.

Asha is a "revolutionary" and that alone is the reason we are supposed to care about her regardless of how much of a dumbass she comes across.

Even when it comes to something like Moana 2, arguably Maui should have been the main character since it was set up in the first movie that he already has beef with the Polynesian Pantheon because they kicked him out and this movie would have effectively been him standing up for humanity but no, we have to make Moana a god.

I would actually use Mirabel as the only protagonist that kind of grows in her face movie because she starts off as basically a side character from a 90s sitcom to a female version of Arnold from Hey Arnold.

There's a lot of selflessness about navigating a family and it's a pretty traditional one to the point that you can just swap out them being Colombian with any ethnicity and it would work.

The bad version of this is turning red where the main character is just a spoiled brat who forces her mother into a gotcha moment and proceeds to act incredibly aloof even until the final credits.
 
  • Avatar and Zootopia - Likely the only films that will really impress.
Avatar 3 is getting to the point that it's a bit overdone, and it's definitely going to be preachy. The first Zootopia had antisementic undertones which helped make it popular but those will definitely be crushed out of the next one, likely with the rabbit family being made out as right wing fascist nazis while that fat gay cop cheetah will be a main character.
 
Avatar 3 is getting to the point that it's a bit overdone, and it's definitely going to be preachy. The first Zootopia had antisementic undertones which helped make it popular but those will definitely be crushed out of the next one, likely with the rabbit family being made out as right wing fascist nazis while that fat gay cop cheetah will be a main character.
The films will do fine. No one goes to Avatar for the plot. As long as it has pretty visuals it will be fine.

Similarly, Zootopia 2 could be a static screen with Judy Hops for 2 hours and furfags would blow a billion dollars on it.
 
Also I want to see Mankind kick Alien ass.
You'd have a better chance of seeing Disney return to their prime than the humans in Avatar being portrayed as anything more than buffoonish idiots (not to mention, Quarritch is going to likely get a redemption arc given how much of a hack James Cameron is with these movies)
 
Asha is a "revolutionary" and that alone is the reason we are supposed to care about her regardless of how much of a dumbass she comes across.
Magnifico was the real protagonist of that movie and Asha pushed him to the brink to boot.
Avatar 3 is getting to the point that it's a bit overdone, and it's definitely going to be preachy.
Even more than the first movie?

he first Zootopia had antisementic undertones which helped make it popular
Hold on, how's that? Is that because the sheep manipulated everyone behind the scenes to demonize the nigger stand-ins? Unlike those, carnivores are not one-note criminals with low IQ.
 
Hold on, how's that? Is that because the sheep manipulated everyone behind the scenes to demonize the nigger stand-ins? Unlike those, carnivores are not one-note criminals with low IQ.
Carnivores were a large part of the society and had a major part in building it and maintaining law and order, and the sheep hatched a plan to make everyone think the carnivores were violent and dangerous so that they would be removed from positions of power and have their legacy destroyed so that the sheep could rule over everything.
 
Carnivores were a large part of the society and had a major part in building it and maintaining law and order, and the sheep hatched a plan to make everyone think the carnivores were violent and dangerous so that they would be removed from positions of power and have their legacy destroyed so that the sheep could rule over everything.
Hmm, no, I don't see it. The sheep was part of the majority race while carnivores here are a minority of sorts. I think the sheep was meant to show the dangers of women being women, aka backstabbing others for personal gain, including other women (Basically, Metoo'ing). The sheep wasn't part of a hated minority that is disliked by every country in the world. Hell, the carnivores here don't even have food issues nor killer instincts (unless artificially forced), so they have it quite good. The OG plot of Zootopia was much more grimdark racism plot, with the carnivores being forced to carry zapping collars.
 
Back
Top Bottom