Disney General - The saddest fandom on Earth

  • Thread starter Thread starter KO 864
  • Start date Start date
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Which is Better

  • Chicken Little

    Votes: 433 27.5%

  • Hunchback 2

    Votes: 57 3.6%

  • A slow death

    Votes: 1,087 68.9%
  • Total voters
    1,577
Newcomer 42 said:
Hmm, no, I don't see it. The sheep was part of the majority race while carnivores here are a minority of sorts. I think the sheep was meant to show the dangers of women being women, aka backstabbing others for personal gain, including other women (Basically, Metoo'ing). The sheep wasn't part of a hated minority that is disliked by every country in the world. Hell, the carnivores here don't even have food issues nor killer instincts (unless artificially forced), so they have it quite good. The OG plot of Zootopia was much more grimdark racism plot, with the carnivores being forced to carry zapping collars.
Click to expand...
what? no, sheep were a minority race in that world. If you watch it literally the only sheep you see is that secretary and her henchmen, there aren't even any other sheep in the background of any of the scenes in the movie
 
A little ewe wanting a race war doesn't mean sheep were a minority race, she was just disillusioned by being the assistant mayor and not the actual one calling the big shots or being the main face for whatever inferiority complex she has. Maybe she just didn't like the idea of being held to the standard of doing her job working alongside some carnivore who'd literally eat her if he wanted to.

Honestly don't think we saw any other employer-employee relationship being "mixed" like it was with the mayor and his assistant mayor to know if prey animals had similar feelings being "underranked" by predator animals in Zootopia itself.
 
Kari Kamiya said:
she was just disillusioned by being the assistant mayor and not the actual one calling the big shots or being the main face for whatever inferiority complex she has.
Click to expand...
and so her solution was to incite a race war where all carnivores were shamed and it was heavily discouraged to put them in places or power no matter how qualified.
 
Betonhaus said:
what? no, sheep were a minority race in that world. If you watch it literally the only sheep you see is that secretary and her henchmen, there aren't even any other sheep in the background of any of the scenes in the movie
Click to expand...
That doesn't necessarily mean her kind is rare, but eh, the villain reveal was waay too late, and too little IMO.

Kari Kamiya said:
who'd literally eat her if he wanted to.
Click to expand...
Carnivores don't seem to have much of that instinct or anything like that, since they can eat fish (something that's explained in supplementary material, can't recall where I learned it), so there's that. Unfortunately, prey animals still have their instincts too.

Betonhaus said:
and so her solution was to incite a race war where all carnivores were shamed and it was heavily discouraged to put them in places or power no matter how qualified.
Click to expand...
To be fair, herbivores are a majority and they hate carnivores too, poor Nick was brutally put down by his asshole not-Boy Scout comrades, so herbivores dislike carnivores and viceversa by default, but yeah, the sheep took it one step furtther.
But again, I think that was meant to be a criticism of Metooing rather than jewry tricks, but it can fit too.
 
More good news boys and girls. Disney being the company that understands the market so much better than anyone else put Zegler's Snow White back in 1330 theatres for Mothers' Day.

It took a mighty $335,000 giving a per theatre tally of just $250. Clearly a glorious win.

Thunderbolts (New Avengers - some crap no-bodies; not Steed, Gambit and Purdy) "only" dropped 55% in it's second week to $33m (and $7,644 per theatre). Problem is the first weekend was so weak that it's still crashing and burning it's way to a large loss. It is ahead of Eternals in nominal terms but when you work inflation in, Eternals is still ahead and had more arses in seats.

Nothing to worry about though. Bobby Iger said less than a week ago at the earnings call that Thunderbolts is the first of the new successful quality MCU films and Bobby's only full of so much shit that you could mistake him for a septic tank on days with a "y" in them.
 

Attachments

Screenshot_20250512_125258_Chrome.webp Screenshot_20250512_125311_Chrome.webp

The screeching about the new Abu Dhabi park has already begun.
Personally im just happy that everyone In that region (Middle East, most of Africa, India etc) now has their own local-ish park, im sure the employees at the european park and the East Asian parks can sleep a bit more easily.
If you dont wanna support tourism to this place just dont go on a trip there, its that easy.
 
Kari Kamiya said:
A little ewe wanting a race war doesn't mean sheep were a minority race, she was just disillusioned by being the assistant mayor and not the actual one calling the big shots or being the main face for whatever inferiority complex she has. Maybe she just didn't like the idea of being held to the standard of doing her job working alongside some carnivore who'd literally eat her if he wanted to.
Click to expand...
It was motivated partly by racism and partly because she thought the mayor was an incompetent asshole (which he was). He left his work to her and threw insults at her every chance he got. He was lazy, incompetent, disrespectful and ungrateful.
 
Milkshake Sniffer said:
Thunderbolts (New Avengers - some crap no-bodies; not Steed, Gambit and Purdy) "only" dropped 55% in it's second week to $33m (and $7,644 per theatre). Problem is the first weekend was so weak that it's still crashing and burning it's way to a large loss.
Click to expand...
I guess the positive reception from the RT scores, the Disney/MCU shills, and the "anti-woke" YouTubers who said it was better than more recent Marvel movies was not enough to have a more profitable second weekend.

 
SpiderBitch said:
Screenshot_20250512_125258_Chrome.webpScreenshot_20250512_125311_Chrome.webp
Click to expand...
By placing the Disney name above the door of a park in the UAE, the company sends a troubling message to employees, creatives, and fans alike: that inclusion is optional.
Click to expand...
Inclusion at the Big Mouse Corporation has always been optional. Every time I think people couldn't possibly keep being fooled by such an obvious marketing ploy, I manage to be proven wrong.

If Disney can make profit by appealing to the "LGBTQ+" crowd in the United States, they will sell Pride merchandise and host Pride events at their parks. If Disney can make profit by building a park in an Islamic shithole, they will not only have local kafala wage slaves build that park, but they will also put hijabs on all of the Disney princesses if Sheikh Mohamed asks them to do it.
 
Last edited:
SpiderBitch said:
If you dont wanna support tourism to this place just dont go on a trip there, its that easy.
Click to expand...

I somehow doubt that the generation of niggercattle who live and breathe the belief that denouncing things on the Internet for updoots is the only outlet for political participation available for them will regard this as an option.
 
Silence of the Troons said:
Inclusion at the Big Mouse Corporation has always been optional.
Click to expand...
Case in point:
In 1978, a group of lesbians and gay men decided they wanted to rent out part of Disneyland for a night. In order to make this happen, they formed the innocent-sounding organization “The Greater Los Angeles Restaurant and Bar Association,” as they knew Disney wouldn’t allow the event if they were up front with who would be attending. About a week before the event, higher-ups at the company found out and panicked. Disney couldn’t shut down the event, fearing an anti-discrimination lawsuit from the organizers, so they prepared for the worst possible scenario.

According to Sean Griffin, media scholar and author of Tinker Belles and Evil Queens: The Walt Disney Company from the Inside Out, told Orlando Weekly that “Live music was canceled at the last second so that there would be no encouragement for same-sex dancing. They beefed up security. They told people who were working that day, or at least for that night, that courtesy was optional.” And speaking of same-sex dancing…
Click to expand...
In 1957, Disneyland began a policy that anyone at their summer Date Night events at Plaza Gardens who wanted to dance had to do so with a partner of the opposite sex. This rule led to several discrimination lawsuits filed against Disney. In 1980, Disneyland security evicted Andrew R. Exler and Shawn Elliott from the park for dancing together at Tomorrowland Terrace during a Disneyland Date Night. They sued the park, and in May 1984, Judge James R. Ross ruled that Disneyland had to allow same-sex dancing. The catch was that this ruling was only to apply to Exler and Elliott. Disneyland lifted the policy shortly after Videopolis opened in 1985, since teenagers requested its removal so that they could dance with their friends.

This wasn’t the end of Disney’s dance-based discrimination against same-sex couples. In 1988, Eric Hubert, Jeffrey Stabile Jr., and Christopher Drake sued Disney after a security guard informed them that “touch dancing is reserved for heterosexual couples only.” Both cases are outlined in greater detail by Kevin Perjurer of Defunctland in his video about the history of Videopolis.
Click to expand...
 
I think the problem that people don't get is that most zillennials tend to wear their politics on their chest like a plate of armor, and more or less just agree for the sake of fitting in as opposed to legitimately believing what they claim.

Rachel as I said before, is a talent that's been around for a very long time and has never really took off in anything, but many of these people online are only praising her because she's pro-palestinian yet none of these people will actually show up to support her in anything she does because even though you know that most of it is slop
 
Ive also seen a lot of people people whining 'who would even go there? this is gonna flop' like the UAE doesn't already get like 20 million tourists per year (USA gets 60 million depspite being like 100x its size) and is also full of western/westernised expats (up to 88% of the population) who seem like exactly the type to go to this park, and its also not nearly as strict on sharia shit as they think it is.

Its not just catering to the wealthy arabs and indians etc either, even from the UK its quicker and cheaper to fly to dubai than to Orlando if they consider the paris park too lame/dated/cold, not to mention groups like wealthy russians. 5 hours from Moscow to Dubai.
Its so hard to comprehend for them that something isnt being built with them in mind, and that people from progressive countries dont inherently have the same values as them. And its also very easy for them to 'boycott' by not taking a 15 hour flight to go visit a disney park instead of their usual 3 hour USA disney flight.

Dubai visitor stats.
Screenshot_20250512_214037_Chrome.webp
 
SpiderBitch said:
Ive also seen a lot of people people whining 'who would even go there? this is gonna flop' like the UAE doesn't already get like 20 million tourists per year (USA gets 60 million depspite being like 100x its size) and is also full of western/westernised expats (up to 88% of the population) who seem like exactly the type to go to this park, and its also not nearly as strict on sharia shit as they think it is.

Its not just catering to the wealthy arabs and indians etc either, even from the UK its quicker and cheaper to fly to dubai than to Orlando if they consider the paris park too lame/dated/cold, not to mention groups like wealthy russians. 5 hours from Moscow to Dubai.
Its so hard to comprehend for them that something isnt being built with them in mind, and that people from progressive countries dont inherently have the same values as them. And its also very easy for them to 'boycott' by not taking a 15 hour flight to go visit a disney park instead of their usual 3 hour USA disney flight.

Dubai visitor stats.
View attachment 7353751
Click to expand...
That is a bit misleading. The US only gets 60 million a year because of how long and costly it is to get a flight across either the Atlantic or Pacific oceans. If it was smack dab in the middle of Europe, it would get several times that number.

But the UAE does have a large number of incredibly wealthy "tourists", it just remains to be seen if they would actually go to a Disney park as their tourists are more focused on business and the...less than legal pleasures that the UAE provides to its wealthier clientele.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom