Disprove YMS' claim fron YMS

>Only vegans can talk about how sexing animals is wrong

Psht. Incels can kill someone and still think sex with a woman is wrong. His platform has no ground to stand on.
 
What I fuck are cooked beef, pork and chicken parts before I eat them, is that better or worse than fucking the live animal?
 
Ethically we're at a point in our society where there really isn't anything wrong with fucking animals.

I don't really like people who fuck animals either but at some point we're gonna have to get used to animal fuckers getting the same treatment as trannies, where we start celebrating people who fuck their dog because they got 'mistreated' by society in the past.

Are you ready for that bright future? With dog-fucking advocates on Colbert? Maybe they'll get their own dedicated shows on streaming services about what it's like to live your life and also fuck horses. It'll be positive, college and highschool students will start fucking animals to fit in and belong in a community bigger than themselves.

I just wanted to kiss guys, and now people chop their dicks off and kill babies. To every single homophobe who warned me about the slipperly slope, I'm sorry.

The future is so bright, it's hurting my eyes.

 
  • Autistic
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: High and a Winner, MaxPayne, Tecumseh and 4 others
Finally an argument for someone who wants to fuck and eat animals. They already go through Literal rape, guys. These tiny cute and fuckable walking fleshlights friends can't consent to the internment and factory line of rape they have to look forward to in their short sad lives, but when a private citizen wants a little bit of the slap and here fido, suddenly they are a villain of some measure?!
 
do you guys really think the homoglobalists will go the childfuck route first? They're already priming with the desmond kid that's clearly on drugs. But things have been quiet in camp dogfuck publicity wise. But meanwhile white girls fuck dogs as subconsciously they want control over the thing they get sex from, but naturally have no access to violence. Or rather the strength to enforce their will with violence. Which is why they relent to soft control (mind games, gaslighting) rather than hard control. But with an animal sex-prisoner they can indulge in the fantasy of hard control by deciding when they want sex, attention, whatever it's not about the effect, but about how she could if she wanted to. It's a twisted sense of the womanly desire for security. Control in her life means safety/contentment, it grounds her, and gives the illusion that without a man she is competent under her own power as well as resourceful. You remember that one bitch who spat on her dog? That's her exercising this concept in order to satisfy her lack of control in other areas of her life most likely.
 
  • Informative
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Irrational Exuberance and Win98SE
YMS believes that animals can consent to sexual relationships with people without realizing its impossible for animals to give informed consent because they lack the cognitive abilities to do so.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Tecumseh and Violence Jack
OP is objectively right.

Porn Theater Usher said:
YMS believes that animals can consent to sexual relationships with people without realizing its impossible for animals to give informed consent because they lack the cognitive abilities to do so.
Click to expand...
Things that cannot give informed consent are things not people and we can do whatever we want with them. The only reason we don't eat the retarded is they taste bad.
 
sigh if only those diseases one gets from fucking animals werent horribly contagious

then we could just let natural selection sort them all out
 
  • Like
Reactions: Porn Theater Usher
Your Weird Fetish said:
OP is objectively right.


Things that cannot give informed consent are things not people and we can do whatever we want with them. The only reason we don't eat the exceptional is they taste bad.
Click to expand...
That's fine, but thats not YMS's argument. He states that animals are able to give consent to sexual relationships.
This is about YMS and his beliefs; not our own.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Your Weird Fetish
Porn Theater Usher said:
That's fine, but thats not YMS's argument. He states that animals are able to give consent to sexual relationships.
This is about YMS and his beliefs; not our own.
Click to expand...
He doesn't say that in the video.
 
Y2K Baby said:
He doesn't say that in the video.
Click to expand...

He explained himself on his Reddit sub when this video was posted there a few years ago.

Adam/YMS said:
Then by your logic all sex in the animal kingdom is non-consensual. Dogs having sex with other dogs is abuse apparently. Yeah, animals can't give legal consent to sex. They also can't give legal consent to literally anything. They can't give legal consent to domestication. They can't give legal consent to surgeries. The question is not whether or not an animal can sign a piece of paper. The question is whether or not a human being should go to jail for having sex with an animal when there is no evidence to suggest that the animal was ever even discomforted from the experience. I wholeheartedly believe that it is possible to sexually abuse an animal. I also believe that it is possible to have non-abusive sex with an animal. I'm not the one dealing in absolutes here. All I'm saying is that these things should be decided on a case-by-case basis without issuing blanket laws. We shouldn't be jailing people for abusing an animal when we can't even tell if the animal was abused.
Click to expand...

He basically believes in positive consent over legal or informed consent. It's a valid point of view to have on the subject; just not one I necessarily agree with.
 
Porn Theater Usher said:
He basically believes in positive consent over legal or informed consent. It's a valid point of view to have on the subject
Click to expand...
No it isn't. He expects an animal to express it's choices in a human manner.
A bitch may be in heat, but she decides which dog gets to mate with her, she is hostile to other dogs.
Animals express themselves in animalistic ways. An animal can be hostile to surgery because it doesn't understand the concept.
An animal screams and struggles in slaughterhouses because it knows what's coming and it has a will to live.

A child doesn't understand sex it can't give consent to something it doesn't understand, so if you have sex with a child, is it wrong? Yes of course it is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Porn Theater Usher
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back