Disprove YMS' claim fron YMS

No it isn't. He expects an animal to express it's choices in a human manner.
A bitch may be in heat, but she decides which dog gets to mate with her, she is hostile to other dogs.
Animals express themselves in animalistic ways. An animal can be hostile to surgery because it doesn't understand the concept.
An animal screams and struggles in slaughterhouses because it knows what's coming and it has a will to live.

A child doesn't understand sex it can't give consent to something it doesn't understand, so if you have sex with a child, is it wrong? Yes of course it is.
I meant valid from the philosophical viewpoint where if you accept the premises, then you must accept the conclusion.

This doesn't mean the argument is sound in its reasoning. For his argument to be sound if and only if it is valid and contains only true premises, and I believe we are in agreement that it does not contain only true premises.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spatula
He explained himself on his Reddit sub when this video was posted there a few years ago.



He basically believes in positive consent over legal or informed consent. It's a valid point of view to have on the subject; just not one I necessarily agree with.
Ironically the dominant mating strategy among a lot of animals is rape.
 
He explained himself on his Reddit sub when this video was posted there a few years ago.



He basically believes in positive consent over legal or informed consent. It's a valid point of view to have on the subject; just not one I necessarily agree with.
Not the point.
 
There's a much higher chance that the animal will endure a greater amount of total stress and pain from a human copulating with it than if it's humanely and properly culled.
 
do you guys really think the homoglobalists will go the childfuck route
It is too useful as a blackmail tool, as a way to vet the lack of morals and as a perk for people that stay in formation. So no.
 
Back