Do all the white supremacists on this forum need a hugbox so bad because they're scared of confrontation?

Whites are a systemically oppressed race, and they deserve a safe space to protect them from hate.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Pimp C
It's interesting how this happens. On black forums white people get mocked in the exact same way Dyn/black people got here. And there is nothing you can really do about it because you will just get clowned (because of your skin color your opinion is invalid) and the people who build their whole identity around their race and collectivism come flooding in to protect their belief system and identity. You're wasting your time "taking a stand" on a forum like this (or any forum for that matter). Not to mention you're exactly the same as them
 
Last edited:
It's interesting how this happens. On black forums white people get mocked in the exact same way Dyn/black people got here. And there is nothing you can really do about it because you will just get clowned (because of your skin color your opinion is invalid) and the people who build their whole identity around their race and collectivism come flooding in to protect their belief system and identity. You're wasting your time "taking a stand" on a forum like this (or any forum for that matter). Not to mention you're exactly the same as them

Dyn is a high quality shitposter. If you really think he has an abbo computer base in the desert, I am sorry to break your dreams.

Mind, it would be kinda metal. Retarded but metal.
 
Dyn is a high quality shitposter. If you really think he has an abbo computer base in the desert, I am sorry to break your dreams.

Mind, it would be kinda metal. Retarded but metal.

Metaltarded, if one will.

Treating others with respect is a ypipo trait and therefore a sign of weakness.

Now read my shitty blog posts disguised as "journalism" about how much of a Nazi you are.

The correct response to shit like this is to ridicule it openly, so any dignity the writer may have can be utterly stripped from it.

For example, in the above example:

"Sounds to me like you can't see black people succeeding without you, their token white savior, explaining why they can't succeed because of white people."
 
Last edited:
  • Feels
Reactions: Male Idiot
Metaltarded, if one will.



The correct response to shit like this is to ridicule it openly, so any dignity the writer may have can be utterly stripped from it.

For example, in the above example:

"Sounds to me like you can't see black people succeeding without you, their token white savior, explaining why they can't succeed because of white people."

Problem is, I seldom see them succeed with or without whitey around.

There isn't any ethnically black successful country.
You can point to Japan and argue "Does that look inferior to you?" and convince most rednecks that you are right. Eventually most right wingers are somewhat pragmatic and they'll believe their eyes.

Sadly, nigs have no such achievement. It is sad, but that is how the world is. If they were all Urkels who suddenly turned smart when they weren't oppressed, we would all be happier.
 
I actually live in a white ethnostate. Right now, in my house, there are exactly zero niggers and zero things that even approximate niggers. The constitution is clear: No niggers at any time ever. This does cause trouble, for example if an appliance or service delivery is attempted over the border by niggers from the United Nigger States, but I just let the nigger killing dogs out and pretend not to hear any screams or answer any phone calls for 48-72 hours.

Obviously my ethnostate is somewhat "uncool" and lacks rhythm, but I'd say the lack of welfare claims and absence of niggerfunk (cocoa butter and pubehead styling products) more than makes up for it.
 
I kinda feel bad that black people hate themselves so much. Progress and creation aren't possible until you learn to accept yourself. Until that day, we'll just see black people forever leeching off the hard-earned accomplishments of white people, forever working themselves up into an impotent rage over it.
 
Problem is, I seldom see them succeed with or without whitey around.

There isn't any ethnically black successful country.
You can point to Japan and argue "Does that look inferior to you?" and convince most rednecks that you are right. Eventually most right wingers are somewhat pragmatic and they'll believe their eyes.

Sadly, nigs have no such achievement. It is sad, but that is how the world is. If they were all Urkels who suddenly turned smart when they weren't oppressed, we would all be happier.
There is a successful black-majority country (more than one, actually). Look up Botswana - it started as one of the poorest, most undeveloped countries on Earth when it gained independence in 1966. Its first president, Seretese Khama, was an avowed anti-communist and wisely instituted a meritocratic system rather than the tribal factionalism seen in many other newly-independent African states. He smartly harnessed the country's natural resources and opportunities for animal husbandry. Botswana has had rapid economic growth and development for the past 50 years and is an upper-middle income country with the lowest levels of perceived corruption on the African continent, on par with South Korea (and ranked higher than Hungary). Botswana (and neighboring Zambia) even provided refuge and land for white farmers displaced from Zimbabwe during Mugabe's thuggish land grabs.
botswana-partnership-a-jewel-in-our-crown.jpg


Rwanda has turned itself around from the violent hellscape it was in the 1990's into the Singapore of Africa, fed by one of the strongest agricultural industries on the continent.

Namibia is also a relatively wealthy country with a growing tourism industry, good race relations, stable governance, well developed infrastructure, and has relatively low corruption (ranked better than Hungary on that metric). It managed to avoid the failures of post-Apartheid governance in South Africa and ZANU-PF in Zimbabwe.
9a6d68dd079cb4da3877c5422790fd05.jpg


Kenya has a strong economy, rapidly developing infrastructure, and rising living standards fed by its diversified and business-friendly economy and aided by a well-educated younger population. It has a massive IT sector which continues to grow.

maxresdefault.jpg

Zambia, Malawi, and Tanzania are rapidly developing and have high levels of socioeconomic growth as well.

Africa is not a monolith of poverty and violence. There are plenty of shitholes on the continent - no doubt about it (the Central African Republic, the Sudans, the D.R.C, Somalia, Niger, Cameroon, etc.) but don't discount the whole thing. The claim that there isn't a single majority-black successful country just doesn't hold any merit when looking at the reality on the ground.
 
There is a successful black-majority country (more than one, actually). Look up Botswana - it started as one of the poorest, most undeveloped countries on Earth when it gained independence in 1966. Its first president, Seretese Khama, was an avowed anti-communist and wisely instituted a meritocratic system rather than the tribal factionalism seen in many other newly-independent African states. He smartly harnessed the country's natural resources and opportunities for animal husbandry. Botswana has had rapid economic growth and development for the past 50 years and is an upper-middle income country with the lowest levels of perceived corruption on the African continent, on par with South Korea (and ranked higher than Hungary). Botswana (and neighboring Zambia) even provided refuge and land for white farmers displaced from Zimbabwe during Mugabe's thuggish land grabs.
View attachment 2830553

Rwanda has turned itself around from the violent hellscape it was in the 1990's into the Singapore of Africa, fed by one of the strongest agricultural industries on the continent.

Namibia is also a relatively wealthy country with a growing tourism industry, good race relations, stable governance, well developed infrastructure, and has relatively low corruption (ranked better than Hungary on that metric). It managed to avoid the failures of post-Apartheid governance in South Africa and ZANU-PF in Zimbabwe.
View attachment 2830550

Kenya has a strong economy, rapidly developing infrastructure, and rising living standards fed by its diversified and business-friendly economy and aided by a well-educated younger population. It has a massive IT sector which continues to grow.

View attachment 2830547
Zambia, Malawi, and Tanzania are rapidly developing and have high levels of socioeconomic growth as well.

Africa is not a monolith of poverty and violence. There are plenty of shitholes on the continent - no doubt about it (the Central African Republic, the Sudans, the D.R.C, Somalia, Niger, Cameroon, etc.) but don't discount the whole thing. The claim that there isn't a single majority-black successful country just doesn't hold any merit when looking at the reality on the ground.
Nambia is a strange success story when you don’t look into it, but it makes a lot of sense when you do. Really impressive how Rwanda turned itself around however.
 
Nambia is a strange success story when you don’t look into it, but it makes a lot of sense when you do. Really impressive how Rwanda turned itself around however.
Care to elaborate? It did strike me as surprising that Namibia hasn't gone super hard on the German population of the country. Namibia faced some of the worst excesses of colonization (the Namaqua and Herero genocides being the most prominent) but they instead openly incorporate aspects of German culture into their heritage rather than try to suppress it as a forced attempt at 'indigenization'. The national dress of the Herero peoples is heavily based on German pioneer outfits.
charles_freger_hereros_2007_018.jpg

mckinley-1.jpg
 
Care to elaborate? It did strike me as surprising that Namibia hasn't gone super hard on the German population of the country. Namibia faced some of the worst excesses of colonization (the Namaqua and Herero genocides being the most prominent) but they instead openly incorporate aspects of German culture into their heritage rather than try to suppress it as a forced attempt at 'indigenization'. The national dress of the Herero peoples is heavily based on German pioneer outfits.
View attachment 2830577
View attachment 2830581
A lot of it is because while the Germans did do horrible shit in Namibia, the Germans at least tried to then set up a colonial government system that included education and infrastructure to prevent future atrocities and to actually “bring civilization”. This effort was genuine too, and extended to other German African colonies. One of the reasons in the First World War that the African troops of Germany were so good was that they were fighting with the knowledge that it was likely going to get far, far worse for them if the Germans lost control. After Namibia was added into South Africa, the existing structure there wasn’t pressed on too hard, and the rebels inside Namibia during the South African Brush War were genuinely popular among the people, and were among the ones pressing the hardest for a diplomatic solution to the problems inside South Africa.

After independence, they kept up that policy and it’s paid off, along with the decisions to attract foreign investment in helping them to get rolling. While being essentially a one party state, it’s also not what you’d call an oppressive regime. Oh, and having like no extradition treaties helped attract some less than reputable types to the major cities with large amounts of ill gained wealth that they then spent in the country.

Namibia also has a lot of attractions for anthropology research, as there’s plenty of tribes in the area with unique language structures and long oral histories to dig into.

EDIT: That being said, most of the country's wealth is held by the small population of white business owners, but the government is very certainly a full democracy. When I say an essentially one party state, it's because the party that was the one who lead the main rebel groups in the Brush War and did most of the negotiations with the UN and with South Africa to try and gain Namibian independence hasn't lost its majority since the first free elections (where there was a staggering 97% turnout for eligible voters - legitimately too, according to all observers) and then made a compromise constitution because while certainly the majority, they didn't have the 2/3rds majority needed to override everyone else at the bargaining table. The country has something like 9 semi-official languages, non-discrimination clauses in the constitution and otherwise is probably the most open and free democracy in Southern Africa.
 
Last edited:
Back