Do you support Hate Speech laws if you are protected by them?

It's uncouth to say so on this site, but if I could get society to punish people for not only saying mean things about me but also for "discriminating" against me for not hiring me or admitting me to a top notch institution (free of charge of course, oppressed people don't have any money), I'd take the opportunity.
I personally don’t blame, say, an affirmative action beneficiary for taking the job, scholarship, whatever. It would be stupid to turn down an opportunity line that. Don’t hate the player, hate the game and all
 
It's uncouth to say so on this site, but if I could get society to punish people for not only saying mean things about me but also for "discriminating" against me for not hiring me or admitting me to a top notch institution (free of charge of course, oppressed people don't have any money), I'd take the opportunity.
You just offended me. Please ban this intolerant bourgeoise.
 
No, because I hate being treated with kid gloves.
Plus, if someone hates you, a few laws arent gonna stop them, they are gonna try to kick your ass (or kill you) regardless of how many laws there are to "prevent it"

If someone punches you, punch back or stay down like a faggot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Violence Jack
No, because they give the State too much power against the individual. It starts out written very specifically, and then the jurisprudence just barrels RIGHT TOWARD authoritarianism as Political actors (including judges) make their respective power grabs over the enforcement of such laws.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Drunk and Pour
No. Obviously trannies don't post here unless they think they're doing some kind of ninja-operation and spying on "the enemy".
We have a substantial number of trannies that post here.
The point of this site is to laugh at shit on both side of the political spectrum.
It just so happens that a good number of trannies are cows.

You are exceptional and apparently don't understand this forum.

The only classes that matter are STR based ones.
RIP Terry.
 
We have a substantial number of trannies that post here.
The point of this site is to laugh at shit on both side of the political spectrum.
It just so happens that a good number of trannies are cows.

You are exceptional and apparently don't understand this forum.


RIP Terry.
Being outside of KIA scares the kekistanis, they need boulders to console them
 
I don't see the problem with the PC system honestly it helps people quite a bit. Besides, we should exploit whatever legal advantages we get. Let's say that I'm black or something and I get fired from a job that pays well. All I have to do is say "Das hate speech" and I get rehired and the manager is arrested.
Do you understand the difference between someone calling you a "nigger" and someone who has power over you cutting off your financial gain simply for being black? One is illegal and one is not.
 
No thanks. I'm already borderline unhirable thanks to labor "protections" for women, I don't want a boycott on top of that.
 
  • DRINK!
Reactions: ConfederateIrishman
I don't think HS laws really prevent civil discussion, in fact they encourage it. You can't talk about shit when some cunt is mocking you for being disabled or LGBT or any other protected class.

I think with the ever changing tidal pool of identity politics and the fact that language and meanings of words change over time I'd pose that this is a step beyond what might be considered as a "slippery slope" argument

Two questions and one statement:

1) why would you want to have a civil discussion with anyone mocking you?

2) if I said "HEY TARD LEGS!!!" (or mockery of your choice) what apart of that is physically damaging to you?

You 100% can "talk shit" when someone is mocking you. I'd even say there probably isn't a more appropriate time to "talk shit" then when someone is mocking you
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zeke Von Genbu
So, ye openly support censorship because ye'd profit from it? That's blatant egoism - the very personality trait that makes somebody unfit to decide between accetable and unacceptable speech.
I'm not the one making the laws just arguing that they protect lots of people, me included.

Hoo boy I see you living a long and successful life here at the Farms.
Me too :D
 
So, ye openly support censorship because ye hope to profit from it? That's blatant egoism - the very personality trait that makes somebody unfit to decide what's okay to say and what not.
It's also frankly stupid and arrogant to support "Hate Speech" laws thinking they can NEVER EVER be used against you if the opposite political party gets into power.
 
I think with the ever changing tidal pool of identity politics and the fact that language and meanings of words change over time I'd pose that this is a step beyond what might be considered as a "slippery slope" argument

Two questions and one statement:

1) why would you want to have a civil discussion with anyone mocking you?

2) if I said "HEY TARD LEGS!!!" (or mockery of your choice) what apart of that is physically damaging to you?

You 100% can "talk shit" when someone is mocking you. I'd even say there probably isn't a more appropriate time to "talk shit" then when someone is mocking you
[/QUOTE
I mean't that you can't have an intellectual conversion when some mindless ruffian is bullying you.

It's also frankly stupid and arrogant to support "Hate Speech" laws thinking they can NEVER EVER be used against you if the opposite political party gets into power.
I don't see right-wingers using them against me. I'm not a target of theirs.

No, because I hate being treated with kid gloves.
Plus, if someone hates you, a few laws arent gonna stop them, they are gonna try to kick your ass (or kill you) regardless of how many laws there are to "prevent it"

If someone punches you, punch back or stay down like a faggot.
Why? Let the state give you money, affirmative action, and stop them from bullying you. Why does it matter? it can only benefit you, fuck everybody else.

Being outside of KIA scares the kekistanis, they need boulders to console them
S H A D I L A Y
 
It depends on the country if its here in the states then I wouldn't care much for hate speech laws, they are just words, why should I give that person the time of day by acknowledging them. This isn't middle school.
 
I don't think HS laws really prevent civil discussion, in fact they encourage it. You can't talk about shit when some cunt is mocking you for being disabled or LGBT or any other protected class.
I assume you're a troll.

You can ignore someone mocking you. Hate speech laws absolutely prevents civil discussion. Let's say some politician introduces a "green new deal", and when it's pointed out how stupid it is, the discussion is flipped into, "You just hate it because you hate minority women". Or some politician says something anti-Semitic, then the rebuttal is, "She's not anti-Semitic, you hate Muslims, women, and people of color".

When you outlaw speech for something as subjective as "hatefulness", people in power will always declare any criticism of them as motivated by nothing but hatred.
I don't see the problem with the PC system honestly it helps people quite a bit. Besides, we should exploit whatever legal advantages we get. Let's say that I'm black or something and I get fired from a job that pays well. All I have to do is say "Das hate speech" and I get rehired and the manager is arrested.
Lie and ruin people's life. Yeah, that's a problem.
 
Back