Inactive Douglas Bryan Spink / Fausty / Cross-Species Alliance / Exitpoint / @LeConteSpink - Pro-Zoophilia Activist, beyond-depraved criminal, owner of cryptostorm VPN, snitch, obtuse egomaniac, dead from cancer; He will not be missed.

[Yutyrannus]

you can read my 400-page book if you want to know more about what really happened

Quit trying to shill your damn book. We aren't giving you money.

The (few) animals that are euthanized are because of the extreme behavioral issues that arise from repeated abuse. That's it. They aren't safe to be around. They can't be rehomed.

Edit: to clarify, I mean euthanasia as a direct response to the animal being sexually abused. I.e. animal control will not instantly destroy ASA victims on the basis of them being fucked by a person.

Anyways, if all animals abused by dog/horse/etcfuckers were euthanized, why is Capone just fine?

From someone else in the animal welfare world: a big fuck you for being apologetic towards any of this.

 

[MetalParakeet]

So many posts in the last 24 hours about how he's too mature and intelligent to respond and "expose" the "bigots" (ie: kiwis).

Who is he trying to convince? He sounds like a broken record

 

[GethN7]

This struck me as rather bizarre, in a dark, twisted sort of way:

And Tait insisted they were his horses, that they hadn’t been “fence hopping”—going onto other people’s property to have sex with animals that didn’t belong to them. (Some zoos think fence hopping is unethical and risky and disavow the practice, believing a person should only have sex with their own animals.

This is what passes for ethics in the animal fucker community: It's fine to rape animals, just so long as you own them.

 

[Yutyrannus]

He sucks at taking his own advice.

Also, wow, this is the least he has tweeted in a while. These are the only tweets from today! Good job, Spinky.



Here's a new orbiter that gave me a chuckle. Spink is a lot of things, but not righteous or courageous.

 

[AnOminous]

The (few) animals that are euthanized are because of the extreme behavioral issues that arise from repeated abuse. That's it. They aren't safe to be around. They can't be rehomed.

Well, that part is bullshit. They actually are mostly euthanized. Animals with behavioral problems who end up in pounds or "shelters" or other such places generally die. That's just what happens. It isn't "few." It's most of them.

 

[Yutyrannus]

Well, that part is bullshit. They actually are mostly euthanized. Animals with behavioral problems who end up in pounds or "shelters" or other such places generally die. That's just what happens. It isn't "few." It's most of them.

I don't necessarily agree in regards to this case, especially with the horses. @Nasty has a post a page back concerning this. Also, if you refer to other animal sexual abuse cases, in most instances I have seen the animals are sent off to shelters/AC holding. Full rehabilitation seems less usual, but if you want some examples I can provide some.

If you mean in regards to euthanasia because the shelters/AC are full and few people adopt animals with baggage, then yeah, many are euthed. But the euth isn't directly BECAUSE of being picked up in an animal sexual abuse case and whatever "sustaining of natural order" this chick is going off about.

Spink and other zoophiles are trying to push the narriative that as soon as an animal is removed from a sexual abuse situation, it is immediately put down. That is not necessarily true, unless AC in that area is really shitty and negligent.

 

[GethN7]

Let me quote Douglas Spink's own words on what he considers unfair retaliation against him and the animals he rapes:

There is no 911 we can call—DO YOU GET THAT YET? Us, our families, we are FAIR GAME. Forever. We have no protection, no
defense but ourselves and our battered, hunted, persecuted community. And if we raise a FINGER to defend our families we will be killed or sent to prison for life—and our partners killed anyway—HOW DO YOU THINK THAT FEELS? TO HAVE THE MURDERERS WALKING FREE, FUCKING GIVING EACH OTHER AWARDS FOR FUCK’S SAKE? That is where we live, every second of every day.
:
It’s not just some “story,” not to us. It’s real. It is ongoing: the hate, the threats, the persecution, the risk to loved ones. Real. My “rapist” isn’t safely behind bars. My loved ones can be murdered AGAIN—tonite, tomorrow, next week...you cannot possibly understand that, and good that you cannot. It is a horror.

I'll not comment on this except to clarify his "loved ones" are the animals he sodomizes.

Edit: @CarreenMaloney, I'm quoting the below from your book because frankly, you should have listened:

That was my introduction to Seattle attorney Jeffrey Steinborn. Steinborn, who specializes in drug-related offenses, was the first lawyer hired by Spink after his 2005 arrest for smuggling cocaine. Back then, Spink didn’t think Steinborn was pursuing what he believed was a viable motion to suppress the evidence in his case. Spink not only fired Steinborn,
he also provided information about him to the feds because he was dissatisfied with how his case was being handled. Steinborn never found out exactly what happened, but for six months afterwards, he lived under threat of indictment. “It was pretty scary,” he said. Now Steinborn was attending Spink’s probation hearing, but only as a spectator. He wanted the satisfaction of seeing his former client in trouble again. “I just came to enjoy watching him get fucked, basically. He ruined my life for so long.”

At the hearing and in a follow-up phone call I made to him, Steinborn warned me emphatically against writing about Spink. He urged me to carefully consider whether I should publish this book. His caution was dark and foreboding; he said that to continue interacting with Spink would destroy my quality of life forever, and that I would live to regret it.

Steinborn had wise advice. You were a fool in my view to reject it.

And given the intentions behind the text I've been reading, I can only hope your defense of this animal molestor hangs around your neck as a lifelong disgrace.

Edit 2: Finally finished the book, let me quote the final paragraph, because it underscores perfectly why Douglas Spink is a monster and so is anyone who defends him.

Uniquely Dangerous sheds light on a phenomenon that—until now— has been so unspeakable in our society that it remained carefully hidden. The secrecy doesn’t change anything, though. The zoos are going to keep doing what they’re doing because it’s who they are. The animals will never tell. And nothing I write in this book and beyond will ever change that.

Note the part in bold, especially "The animals will never tell."

They can't, and no matter how Douglas or any of his defenders and fellow animal rapists try to sugarcoat things, they are engaging in sexual relations for the express purpose of sexual relations with those cannot lawfully consent, understand the consequences of the actions they are involved in as concerns sex with humans bound to the laws of society, and disregards that animals are lawfully protected against sexual exploitation in this manner because it is done in a manner that only one of the parties can both sexually enjoy and understand the consequences of.

Spink is a defiant, unrepentant animal rapist, he's a mentally ill man who never realized his lust for animals was an unhealthy deviance, and now he's engaged his own aberrations to the point he is unwilling to ever change his ways., regardless of any legal or other consequences, and actively seeks to and professes intent to elude, evade,and defy such consequences.

He is, by any definition, based on the evidence (whitewashed as the book I read is), a danger to animals and to society at large, and anyone who can defend that is either an accomplice to his actions or an enabling influence on his continued deviance.

 

[crunchysalty]

Lol, looks like we ran off @CarreenMaloney so much for logic, you horse fucker enabler.

 

[s0mbra]

She showed her true intentions when she tried to link raping animals to using them for food and breeding.

No wonder Spink wanted to shill this book so hard.

Any other interesting bits from her book?

 

[GethN7]

She showed her true intentions when she tried to link raping animals to using them for food and breeding.

No wonder Spink wanted to shill this book so hard.

Any other interesting bits from her book?

PLENTY.

There is a lot of accounts from other animal fuckers (many of which, like cowards, refused to be identified by their real names), let me cover a few highlights of lady animal fuckers:

Of the many zoos I interacted with, just two were female. Male zoophiles told me there are lots of female zoos out there, but they tend to be less vocal about it. Perhaps more women will come forward to tell their stories after this book is published.

I hope so, we need more material to mock.

Growing up in a small, predominantly white town in the American Midwest, Natalie (not her real name) stood out as different because of her racial background—half African American, half Native American. She is also legally blind. She was bullied and sexually abused by other children from a young age. One experience she recalled was being pushed into the school
bathroom and forced to perform oral sex on several boys, only to be called in to the principal’s office, where she was accused of being promiscuous. Now in her late twenties, Natalie is unable to trust people for sexual interactions. She asked me: why was it wrong for her to position herself on her hands and knees to allow her dog to mount and penetrate her? Did it harm her dog?

Fine, I get it, she had a shitty life, but letting herself come on to a dog is not really helping her case trying to prove she isn't sexually promiscuous, and again, let's remember, ANIMALS CANNOT CONSENT IN A MANNER LEGALLY RECOGNIZED BY HUMAN LAW, so yes, there is a LOT wrong with this.

The only other female zoo I interviewed hasn’t yet had sex with the animal of her affections, but she badly wants to. The Florida woman is attracted to dolphins. “I’ve had some encounters with them but nothing sexual yet,” said Sandy (not her real name).

Why oh WHY am I not surprised they are from Florida?

The closest she got was a coupling that she witnessed but didn’t participate in. “One time I was on my boat, two orcas swam right up to me and made it at my feet. I was like four feet from them. My clitoris sprung into attention—ping!—and I couldn’t get that silly grin off my face for three days.

It was so special because they don’t come next to people and mate.”

A chance encounter with mating orcas does not mean you had a shot, nor does it mean it's reasonable or healthy to get wet when they aren't even of a species you were remotely intended to have sex with.

Whenever Sandy dives, she has a knife at the ready in case an opportunity presents itself. “Even if it’s winter time, I can always cut a split in my wet suit if a dolphin wants to play. I’m not banking my life on it, but I’m never going to turn down the opportunity if it does happen.”

This is basically a case of this woman ASKING FOR IT ON PURPOSE, and again, if you are shredding swimsuits just on the off chance you might get boned by a dolphin, YOU ARE MENTALLY ILL AND NEED HELP.

 

[Yutyrannus]

"My clitoris sprung into attention—ping!"

Uh. Ew???

 

[BE 911]

Meanwhile, another brilliant idea by Spink: create a twitter blocklist for anyone that doesn't approve of his animal fucking, also known as the Bigotz Blocklist. Population in a few months: almost the entirety of Twitter.

The account in question.

Account / Archive

 

[Nasty]

I know many people who were victims of sexual abuse, rape, or assault in their lives. I think I can say that of all the women I know, the majority have been sexually abused in some way (of course not everyone is going to share that so it could be even more women).

The thing that stands out about the survivors of CSA or SA/rape that I know is that they don’t turn to sexually abusing animals. Having sex with animals and claiming “well, I was abused as a child” is a bullshit cop-out. It’s not the animals’ fault you never sought out therapy or counselling, it’s not the animals’ fault that you never went to the police or told your story to someone who cared.
Instead of reaching out to a support network, you decide to use animals as sexual objects — tools, living dildos — and claim that’s just how you “are”.

At the risk of :powerlevel:, I will admit that I’ve been a victim of abuse. I turned to drugs, promiscuous sex, alcohol, and abused medication. This was the idiotic mindset I sunk myself into and that was it for me, that was my hole I was going to stay in and that’s just how life is now.... but it’s not and never should have been. I got help, I got therapy, I reached out to a support network I should have known I had all along.

Sexual abuse or trauma is not an excuse to sink into a hole of thinking that having sex with animals is normal or an acceptable way to live.
What an asinine belief, what a disgusting fucking cop-out.

 

[AnOminous]

Spink and other zoophiles are trying to push the narriative that as soon as an animal is removed from a sexual abuse situation, it is immediately put down. That is not necessarily true, unless AC in that area is really shitty and negligent.

What's more, if this were actually true, it just underscores how contemptuous these freaks are of the actual welfare of the animals they claim to love.

If they really loved them, and knew they'd get put down if they got caught, they'd forego getting their rocks off for the sake of the animals they claim to love.

 

[I'd buy that for a dollar]

"Growing up in a small, predominantly white town in the American Midwest, Natalie (not her real name) stood out as different because of her racial background—half African American, half Native American. She is also legally blind. She was bullied and sexually abused by other children from a young age. One experience she recalled was being pushed into the school
bathroom and forced to perform oral sex on several boys, only to be called in to the principal’s office, where she was accused of being promiscuous."

Sounds like a very true story and not totally made up.

 

[GethN7]

That book on Spink, when not slavishly being apologism for his deviance, did give a window into what passes for "ethics", as he sees them:

1. Spink has gone record that even in prison, he wanted to have a vegetarian or vegan diet. This was basically because, as an out and proud animal rapist, he believes it's unethical to eat what you fuck, even though he does not eat horse or dog, his rapist inclinations of choice.

2. He also took pronounced umbrage to being accused of being a "sheep fucker" when he at one point lived near a sheep farm, where he spent more time wanting to nail the sheepdog anyway. This is darkly ironic considering horses and dogs are fine in his book, but he considers it a genuine insult to be accused of raping sheep.

3. He also is profoundly against the spaying and neutering of domesticated animals of any sort, considering it "genital mutilation" and thus inhumane treatment, while otherwise seeing no issue with sticking his dick in a dog or horse's ass, which he sees as acceptable.

It bears mentioning that in having this belief, he skirts over the fact spaying and neutering is infinitely more preferable to mass euthanasia of the animals he wants to have sex with, as it considered inhumane to mass kill animals meant for human companionship while dealing with feral ones is another matter because they cannot be kept to reasonable population levels in any other fashion.

4. Another darkly hypocritical fact is that he has claimed to loathe coercing animals into having sex with him, instead preferring to "invite" them to do so of their own volition, which generally means gaining their trust then sexually coming on to them during their periods of arousal, and since he mentioned keeping them under such tight security they had no other means of relieving their sexual tension, he was basically trying to limit their options to just him for an outlet, and since he deliberately sought to win their trust so he could perform these acts with them, it's still coercion, just a more subtle version.


tl;dr: Despite his claims, his "ethics" ultimately are for his own benefit and to reinforce his delusion he's not the monster.

 

[Solzhenitsyn]

Good work, @GethN7.
I wonder if this lady thinks of herself as some variant of Louis Theroux. If so, I suspect she understands very little of his methods and how he chooses to present his subjects.

 

[GethN7]

Good work, @GethN7.
I wonder if this lady thinks of herself as some variant of Louis Theroux. If so, I suspect she understands very little of his methods and how he chooses to present his subjects.

I'm convinced the author became way too emotionally invested in her subject matter and has become an unknowing zealot for them because the acquaintance with her subject and her journalistic detachment have blurred to nonexistance.

It's a phenomenon of book authors known as "falling in love with your own villain", where an author loves the villain they created so much they can't bear to make them suffer or look bad after a certain point.

It's why the last book in the Hannibal Lecter series chronologically practically let him get away with his plans with no consequences, Harris just couldn't bear to screw over Lecter because he felt too much sympathy for his own villain.

 

[The Littlest Shitlord]

2. He also took pronounced umbrage to being accused of being a "sheep fucker" when he at one point lived near a sheep farm, where he spent more time wanting to nail the sheepdog anyway. This is darkly ironic considering horses and dogs are fine in his book, but he considers it a genuine insult to be accused of raping sheep.

This would make sense considering that he claims to loathe coercing animals into sex, because you are simply not going to have sex with a sheep any other way. Sheep literally can't even tell the difference between men and women and are definitely not going to experience sexual attraction to either one; mating behavior in sheep is completely driven by specialized scents that humans simply don't have. Admitting to sex with sheep would confirm him in the eyes of his fellow zoos as an animal rapist, causing some (but unfortunately not all) of them to shun him.

 

[Jigaboo Jones]

Meanwhile, another brilliant idea by Spink: create a twitter blocklist for anyone that doesn't approve of his animal fucking, also known as the Bigotz Blocklist. Population in a few months: almost the entirety of Twitter.

ayyyy. Honestly, he was always an animal fucker, and a degenerate, and enough of an asshole to

(I digress: snitch on his own lawyer (that one was new to me, and I could only speculate what that involved, but it's certainly heinous. I'd like to think that it was some grandiose quadruple-cross worthy of a TV serial but probably it was just more like him, in the true style of many sufferers of The Syndrome Formerly Known As Aspergers, thinking that he knew better than the lawyer and then going into a fit of tard rage when the lawyer, actually being a lawyer, knew better than he did ... then screwing over the lawyer because, autism, and then, presumably, going full on snitch) .... anyway, I digress (butwhattheactualfuck what kind of an exceptional individual snitches on his own lawyer?)​

b-b-b-but, fuck, I can't even .... Like, the silly girl who wrote the book on him describes him as calmly and in a dignified manner responding to people who were criticizing him for fucking dogs, right? That's actually true. I saw it on Bluelight with my own eyes. He was a horrible person, but he actually handled his critics like a decent one, using that old sociopathic charisma. Now, he is just trying to whine, play the victim, play on the SJW sympathies, and as someone else put it, add another letter to "LGB" shitcircus (which even when it started out had a case of "one of these things is not like the other", and now is just a clusterfuck of deviance that...

Spoiler