"Doxing" in 2025

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
I don't think this is a very good replacement term. It's probably fine if you figure out what someone's same is and post it, but the connotations aren't that the post will have more than that. It's not full documentation or a full dossier.
When you take the mask away you expose their true identity. Kind of like Batman. That's basically what doxxing is. Exposing someone's identity or taking away their anonymity provided by the internet. If they haven't gone full retard and done it themselves.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: UERISIMILITUDO
I much like the term "Tabloiding" since that connects to what is already being done legally by magazines such as People magazine or paparazzis who technically A-log way worse than what we on the farms do with simply showing publicly available or voluntarily given info. If it's not harassment to stalk celebrities and take photos of them without their consent in public, then it's not harassment to discuss or share videos/social media posts/official docs that are available or legally obtainable.

Phonebooking is also a good one since it connects to the concept that anyone can easily look up info about someone in a way that we have done so for decades.
 
Double posting, because fuck Null and the mods on how retarded this subject is.

One day someone will get killed because their address is on here. The killer will say he killed them because their address was here.

Null will reply “no stalker child, your definitions are wrong, we are men who have sex with men, it is you who are gay. Enjoy prison.”

Then we’ll wonder why The Internet Preservation Society went no where.

Then he’ll do more Jew sperging for people to clip and send to congressmen he wants to talk to whilst calling all his possible allies cucks and race traitors.

Are you all fucking stupid?
 
Last edited:
“That’s doxing”
Snooooooort “Well, here we call it [insert gay shit]”

How does no one see what Rekieta level magic words legal defence Redditor shit this is?

Is everyone here that retarded?
I agree with you on principle and think self-censorship to appease normies who already hate us is stupid, but you're clearly MATI so pound sand
 
It’s seriously retarded on about a million levels and every spastic on here is like, “hey, this will work.”

I’m speaking truth to autism.
You faggots will have all the same rights as everyone else, but instead of referring to you as "doxers" you can be... butt buddies.

Instead of "doxing", you'll be... butt buddies. You won't be "phonebooking", you'll be... butt buddies.
Get it? Instead of "sunshing", you'd be... butt buddies.
 
At the risk of being a fun killer, I think using literally any of the boring dictionary words being discussed would accomplish the goal (deanonymize, expose, identify, etc.) however using any made-up slang term would defeat the purpose.

If a large number of users adopt a new slang term on the explicit grounds that it is a 1-to-1 synonym for "dox", that would have zero impact on the ability of hit pieces to accuse this site of doxing. Any article would simply need to note "'xxx' is Kiwi Farms' euphemism for 'doxing'" in a parenthetical or, if they are feeling ambitious, could simply replace the term with "dox" within brackets. As the term is not a real word, most readers would take the article at its word. A minority would Google the term to confirm what it means. As Kiwi Farms is essentially unlisted from Google, the first result would confirm the term is indeed a Kiwi Farms dog whistle for doxing and criminal harassment, and that anybody using the slang term is probably a terrorist.

This is significantly harder to achieve with a normal dictionary word. Everybody knows what "deanonymize" means (for example), and the median reader will not believe that "deanonymizing" people is a crime in itself. A hit piece author can argue that the term “deanonymize” is being used euphemistically to refer to criminal harassment within a post, however that claim is less likely to be accepted at face value.
 
“That’s doxing”
Snooooooort “Well, here we call it [insert gay shit]”

How does no one see what Rekieta level magic words legal defence Redditor shit this is?

Is everyone here that retarded?
Yeah but if it results in slightly fewer pains in the ass for the guy who provides this site, it's just courteous to comply on this site.
 
The way I see it is if I had an ex that can hire a gumshoe to track me throughout the day, request personal info that is provided legally for a few, and compile it into a report to detail my daily activities and it's completely legal then I don't see what is there to be concerned about.

Hell, companies have hired armies of private investigators to essentially stalk whistleblowers to the point where it borders harassment and that is still in the realm of legality.

What we do is no different than People Magazine in that we chronicle retards that post their idiotic behavior online. No one here in their right mind who isn't a flaming homosexual would A-log or essentially act in the same way these corporate cum guzzling detectives would. We are long past the days where we condone holding some tard's PSN account hostage unless they film themselves shoving a cursed medallion made out of Crayola magic putty up their poorly maintained poop chute.
 
Yeah but if it results in slightly fewer pains in the ass for the guy who provides this site, it's just courteous to comply on this site.
Seriously, how? We’re still doing what people think is doxing but we’re just giving it a new gay nane.

In what reality outside of being terminally online does this work in the real world?

“You’ve got the address of a mentally ill guy and all his family there, that’s doxing”
“Well, actually, we call it fluffy kittens and it’s perfectly legal!”

Can’t anyone see how dumb this is? Is sucking off an e-daddy that intoxicating?
 
Hell, companies have hired armies of private investigators to essentially stalk whistleblowers to the point where it borders harassment and that is still in the realm of legality.
A major difference is we don't stalk people, but PIs essentially have a license to do what would be illegal stalking if anyone else did it. You'll occasionally see a really bent one like Anthony Pellicano (Cruise's PI at one point) get busted for actual crimes, but when they do, it's ridiculous how they have often gotten away with completely absurd shit for years or decades.
 
this situation with getting jewed, is the same as in china. They need to find replacement words because certain words are banned. The internet has already entered a new age of censorship, but it's become harder and harder to tell.
Anything that was a threat, they managed to infiltrate and subvert. It's a never ending cat and mouse game of innovators trying to escape the clutches of the jew and their golems
 
The thing with jews is that they infiltrate groups by pretending to be black(drake/kendrick)/white(too many to count), play the victim card whenever possible because of the holocoaster, and then actively sabotage the group they've infiltrated while promoting other jews.

I can't imagine the horrors that await us when chinese jews come into existence.
god help us all
 
If a large number of users adopt a new slang term on the explicit grounds that it is a 1-to-1 synonym for "dox", that would have zero impact on the ability of hit pieces to accuse this site of doxing. Any article would simply need to note "'xxx' is Kiwi Farms' euphemism for 'doxing'" in a parenthetical or, if they are feeling ambitious, could simply replace the term with "dox" within brackets. As the term is not a real word, most readers would take the article at its word. A minority would Google the term to confirm what it means. As Kiwi Farms is essentially unlisted from Google, the first result would confirm the term is indeed a Kiwi Farms dog whistle for doxing and criminal harassment, and that anybody using the slang term is probably a terrorist.
This is another good argument against a word filter. Not that it hasn't already been beaten to death.
A major difference is we don't stalk people, but PIs essentially have a license to do what would be illegal stalking if anyone else did it. You'll occasionally see a really bent one like Anthony Pellicano (Cruise's PI at one point) get busted for actual crimes, but when they do, it's ridiculous how they have often gotten away with completely absurd shit for years or decades.
What are the restrictions on what can happen with the data/information they gather? If it gets posted online afterwards, does that change anything?
 
Back