Dramacow Dr. Fanta's own Kiwi Farms thread - AnimatedJames Whiteknight and Attention Whore

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Thanks for the welcome!

But no, if he's already in a NATURAL relationship, he doesn't just need to make a new one out of thin air with an older girl.

Still man, there is the issue of Statutory on this one. I have crunched the numbers. AJ is doing very well economically for himself. Maybe he should just cool off and let the girl have 2 years to mature.

Why risk it all in the first place?
 
A) Why would he draw pictures of kids in sexual situations if he wasn't attracted to them in some way in real life?
B)How is it harmless if he derives sexual gratification from it?

Please, I'm just trying to understand your reasoning here.
A. Because cartoon kids are FAR different from IRL kids, lol.
B. He's not planning to harm these kids. Besides, they're just FICTON, not FACT.

Still man, there is the issue of Statutory on this one. I have crunched the numbers. AJ is doing very well economically for himself. Maybe he should just cool off and let the girl have 2 years to mature.

Why risk it all in the first place?
Because, he doesn't care what the haters think. It's better to just ABANDON the false sense of morality, amirite?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
A. Because cartoon kids are FAR different from IRL kids, lol.
B. He's not planning to harm these kids. Besides, they're just FICTON, not FACT.
I'm sure James appreciates you white-knighting him, but I think you might want to just quit now while you still have a chance to salvage something. I'm sure James himself would have by now.
 
Because, he doesn't care what the haters think. It's better to just ABANDON the false sense of morality, amirite?

This is not about morality - this is about the law and it says that this kind of stuff is increasingly becoming illegal.

If AJ breaks the law his nice 6 figure income is over. For a 20 year old to be doing well and throw it away on this is a clear mistake.
 
This is not about morality - this is about the law and it says that this kind of stuff is increasingly becoming illegal.

If AJ breaks the law his nice 6 figure income is over. For a 20 year old to be doing well and throw it away on this is a clear mistake.
Hey, he tells all the naysayers to call the cops, and they don't. Like that BalishChannel loser. So I think he's safe. He's a pretty brave man, and I RESPECT him for that.
 
Hey, he tells all the naysayers to call the cops, and they don't. Like that BalishChannel loser. So I think he's safe. He's a pretty brave man, and I RESPECT him for that.

Don't believe me - here it is right from the US Department of Justice website.

http://www.justice.gov/criminal/ceos/citizensguide/citizensguide_obscenity.html

Obscenity Involving Minors

Federal statues specifically prohibit obscenity involving minors, and convicted offenders generally face harsher statutory penalties than if the offense involved only adults.
Section 1470 of Title 18, United States Code, prohibits any individual from knowingly transferring or attempting to transfer obscene matter using the U.S. mail or any means or facility of interstate or foreign commerce to a minor under 16 years of age. Convicted offenders face fines and imprisonment for up to 10 years.
In addition, Section 1466A of Title 18, United State Code, makes it illegal for any person to knowingly produce, distribute, receive, or possess with intent to transfer or distribute visual representations, such as drawings, cartoons, or paintings that appear to depict minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct and are deemed obscene. This statute offers an alternative 2-pronged test for obscenity with a lower threshold than the Miller test. The matter involving minors can be deemed obscene if it (i) depicts an image that is, or appears to be a minor engaged in graphic bestiality, sadistic or masochistic abuse, or sexual intercourse and (ii) if the image lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value. A first time offender convicted under this statute faces fines and at least 5 years to a maximum of 20 years in prison.
There are also laws to protect children from obscene or harmful material on the Internet. For one, federal law prohibits the use of misleading domain names, words, or digital images on the Internet with intent to deceive a minor into viewing harmful or obscene material (See 18 U.S.C. §§ 2252B, 2252C). It is illegal for an individual to knowingly use interactive computer services to display obscenity in a manner that makes it available to a minor less than 18 years of age (See 47 U.S.C. § 223(d) –Communications Decency Act of 1996, as amended by the PROTECT Act of 2003). It is also illegal to knowingly make a commercial communication via the Internet that includes obscenity and is available to any minor less than 17 years of age (See 47 U.S.C. § 231 –Child Online Protection Act of 1998).
The standard of what is harmful to minors may differ from the standard applied to adults. Harmful materials for minors include any communication consisting of nudity, sex or excretion that (i) appeals to the prurient interest of minors, (ii) is patently offensive to prevailing standards in the adult community with respect to what is suitable material for minors, (iii) and lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value for minors.
In addition to facing imprisonment and fines, convicted offenders of federal obscenity laws involving minors may also be required to register as sex offenders. Furthermore, in some circumstances, obscenity violations involving minors may also be subject to prosecution under federal child pornography laws, which yield serve statutory penalties (For more information, see Citizen´s Guide to U.S. Federal Child Pornography Laws).

This a federal law. That means that AJ does not go to regular state or local prison. He goes to Federal Pen. Not a nice place.
 
Don't believe me - here it is right from the US Department of Justice website.

http://www.justice.gov/criminal/ceos/citizensguide/citizensguide_obscenity.html

Obscenity Involving Minors

Federal statues specifically prohibit obscenity involving minors, and convicted offenders generally face harsher statutory penalties than if the offense involved only adults.
Section 1470 of Title 18, United States Code, prohibits any individual from knowingly transferring or attempting to transfer obscene matter using the U.S. mail or any means or facility of interstate or foreign commerce to a minor under 16 years of age. Convicted offenders face fines and imprisonment for up to 10 years.
In addition, Section 1466A of Title 18, United State Code, makes it illegal for any person to knowingly produce, distribute, receive, or possess with intent to transfer or distribute visual representations, such as drawings, cartoons, or paintings that appear to depict minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct and are deemed obscene. This statute offers an alternative 2-pronged test for obscenity with a lower threshold than the Miller test. The matter involving minors can be deemed obscene if it (i) depicts an image that is, or appears to be a minor engaged in graphic bestiality, sadistic or masochistic abuse, or sexual intercourse and (ii) if the image lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value. A first time offender convicted under this statute faces fines and at least 5 years to a maximum of 20 years in prison.
There are also laws to protect children from obscene or harmful material on the Internet. For one, federal law prohibits the use of misleading domain names, words, or digital images on the Internet with intent to deceive a minor into viewing harmful or obscene material (See 18 U.S.C. §§ 2252B, 2252C). It is illegal for an individual to knowingly use interactive computer services to display obscenity in a manner that makes it available to a minor less than 18 years of age (See 47 U.S.C. § 223(d) –Communications Decency Act of 1996, as amended by the PROTECT Act of 2003). It is also illegal to knowingly make a commercial communication via the Internet that includes obscenity and is available to any minor less than 17 years of age (See 47 U.S.C. § 231 –Child Online Protection Act of 1998).
The standard of what is harmful to minors may differ from the standard applied to adults. Harmful materials for minors include any communication consisting of nudity, sex or excretion that (i) appeals to the prurient interest of minors, (ii) is patently offensive to prevailing standards in the adult community with respect to what is suitable material for minors, (iii) and lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value for minors.
In addition to facing imprisonment and fines, convicted offenders of federal obscenity laws involving minors may also be required to register as sex offenders. Furthermore, in some circumstances, obscenity violations involving minors may also be subject to prosecution under federal child pornography laws, which yield serve statutory penalties (For more information, see Citizen´s Guide to U.S. Federal Child Pornography Laws).

This a federal law. That means that AJ does not go to regular state or local prison. He goes to Federal Pen. Not a nice place.
Once again you people forget one MAJOR detail- he's NOT looking for sexual activity, just a friendly dating relationship.
 
Don't believe me - here it is right from the US Department of Justice website.

http://www.justice.gov/criminal/ceos/citizensguide/citizensguide_obscenity.html

Obscenity Involving Minors

Federal statues specifically prohibit obscenity involving minors, and convicted offenders generally face harsher statutory penalties than if the offense involved only adults.
Section 1470 of Title 18, United States Code, prohibits any individual from knowingly transferring or attempting to transfer obscene matter using the U.S. mail or any means or facility of interstate or foreign commerce to a minor under 16 years of age. Convicted offenders face fines and imprisonment for up to 10 years.
In addition, Section 1466A of Title 18, United State Code, makes it illegal for any person to knowingly produce, distribute, receive, or possess with intent to transfer or distribute visual representations, such as drawings, cartoons, or paintings that appear to depict minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct and are deemed obscene. This statute offers an alternative 2-pronged test for obscenity with a lower threshold than the Miller test. The matter involving minors can be deemed obscene if it (i) depicts an image that is, or appears to be a minor engaged in graphic bestiality, sadistic or masochistic abuse, or sexual intercourse and (ii) if the image lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value. A first time offender convicted under this statute faces fines and at least 5 years to a maximum of 20 years in prison.
There are also laws to protect children from obscene or harmful material on the Internet. For one, federal law prohibits the use of misleading domain names, words, or digital images on the Internet with intent to deceive a minor into viewing harmful or obscene material (See 18 U.S.C. §§ 2252B, 2252C). It is illegal for an individual to knowingly use interactive computer services to display obscenity in a manner that makes it available to a minor less than 18 years of age (See 47 U.S.C. § 223(d) –Communications Decency Act of 1996, as amended by the PROTECT Act of 2003). It is also illegal to knowingly make a commercial communication via the Internet that includes obscenity and is available to any minor less than 17 years of age (See 47 U.S.C. § 231 –Child Online Protection Act of 1998).
The standard of what is harmful to minors may differ from the standard applied to adults. Harmful materials for minors include any communication consisting of nudity, sex or excretion that (i) appeals to the prurient interest of minors, (ii) is patently offensive to prevailing standards in the adult community with respect to what is suitable material for minors, (iii) and lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value for minors.
In addition to facing imprisonment and fines, convicted offenders of federal obscenity laws involving minors may also be required to register as sex offenders. Furthermore, in some circumstances, obscenity violations involving minors may also be subject to prosecution under federal child pornography laws, which yield serve statutory penalties (For more information, see Citizen´s Guide to U.S. Federal Child Pornography Laws).

This a federal law. That means that AJ does not go to regular state or local prison. He goes to Federal Pen. Not a nice place.
So, in that case, basically the only reason he's not been completely fucked over at this point is because the people he calls bluff on just happen to not know federal law well enough to know this particular bit?

Except for the fact that it isn't exactly sexual.
I'd tend to disagree, given that the entire purpose of dating is to eventually find somebody to have children with.
 
So, in that case, basically the only reason he's not been completely fucked over at this point is because the people he calls bluff on just happen to not know federal law well enough to know this particular bit?


I'd tend to disagree, given that the entire purpose of dating is to eventually find somebody to have children with.
There's something called "online dating". Those people KEEP it online-only, like he does.
 
Except for the fact that it isn't exactly sexual.

It is okay for James to be in a Platonic relationship. The problem is when it becomes more than that.

Here below is a key part of that passage I gave you. Illustrations count as pornography now. Read this section and understand that if anything James does fits into those criteria, Animated James can go to jail for at least 5 years to a maximum of 20. They are very serious about CP these days. AJ should not risk it.

The quote from the USDOJ website:

This statute offers an alternative 2-pronged test for obscenity with a lower threshold than the Miller test. The matter involving minors can be deemed obscene if it (i) depicts an image that is, or appears to be a minor engaged in graphic bestiality, sadistic or masochistic abuse, or sexual intercourse and (ii) if the image lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value. A first time offender convicted under this statute faces fines and at least 5 years to a maximum of 20 years in prison.
 
It is okay for James to be in a Platonic relationship. The problem is when it becomes more than that.

Here below is a key part of that passage I gave you. Illustrations count as pornography now. Read this section and understand that if anything James does fits into those criteria, Animated James can go to jail for at least 5 years to a maximum of 20. They are very serious about CP these days. AJ should not risk it.

The quote from the USDOJ website:

This statute offers an alternative 2-pronged test for obscenity with a lower threshold than the Miller test. The matter involving minors can be deemed obscene if it (i) depicts an image that is, or appears to be a minor engaged in graphic bestiality, sadistic or masochistic abuse, or sexual intercourse and (ii) if the image lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value. A first time offender convicted under this statute faces fines and at least 5 years to a maximum of 20 years in prison.
He barely drew a pic of her except for an informative comic, not pornographic. AND... I have said this like THOUSANDS of times... but STOP! ASSUMING! HE'LL! ENGAGE! IN! SEXUAL! ACTIVITY!
 
It is okay for James to be in a Platonic relationship. The problem is when it becomes more than that.

Here below is a key part of that passage I gave you. Illustrations count as pornography now. Read this section and understand that if anything James does fits into those criteria, Animated James can go to jail for at least 5 years to a maximum of 20. They are very serious about CP these days. AJ should not risk it.

The quote from the USDOJ website:

This statute offers an alternative 2-pronged test for obscenity with a lower threshold than the Miller test. The matter involving minors can be deemed obscene if it (i) depicts an image that is, or appears to be a minor engaged in graphic bestiality, sadistic or masochistic abuse, or sexual intercourse and (ii) if the image lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value. A first time offender convicted under this statute faces fines and at least 5 years to a maximum of 20 years in prison.
Why are you responding to him when you are constantly the one telling others not to feed the trolls?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back