To be real though, I’m kinda wanting to get a bit into the lore of Doctor Who.
My dads side of the family really enjoyed other Sci-Fi-Space Epics like Star Wars, Star Trek and Battlestar Galactica, so I was surprised I never even heard of Dr. Who until the 00s
I’m big into 80s Television Programs. Was the 80s incarnation and storylines any good?
I kind of dropped out of Who mid-run on the Twelfth Doctor. And everything I saw of Jodie Whitaker's Doctor never enticed me back in the slightest. But... prior to that I was a pretty big Doctor Who fan. So here is my disordered suggestions to you on the subject.
The lore was mostly consistent-ish up until the Whitaker era. Sure, some mad stuff but for the most part could be patched over with some theories here and there. The Eighties is one of the worst times to look at DW though as that's when there were some weird plans to make him some kind of super-special person. Prior to Seven, he was pretty much the hooligan drop-out of Time Lord society. When he makes a snide remark about Romana's grades at the academy her response is something like: "well it's better than scraping through with a pass on my second attempt". Of course he makes up for that with his experience and more general cunning but the take-away is that he's nothing inherently special in Time Lord society. And in fact, becomes something of a useful tool of them at one point when they want a little plausible deniability on messing with the time stream. In Eight, there's all this stuff about "who he really is". For me that undermines the character somewhat though the ship is somewhat righted in the Nine/Ten/Eleven era when there's an actual reason the Doctor is this special case due to his role in the Time War. That said, I'm probably misrepresenting things given incidences like the "President of Gallifrey" stuff but somehow things like that never seemed to change the general character the way 80's hints of "it was a time of chaos" and certainly stuff like the Whitaker "timeless child" guff.
Anyway, getting ahead of myself. Here's a run down of the Doctors for everyone else to disagree with, written from the point of view of telling you what you might and might not like.
First Doctor (William Hartnell). Minimal budget, no reference to the Time Lords, Doctor Who really was an unknown stranger we knew nothing about except that he had a grand-daughter Susan with whom he travelled. You'll see some amusing and unintended historical comedy, plots that move at black and white TV serial pace (i.e. slowly) but is generally pretty entertaining. It's also got a lot more pure historicals in it. I.e. no aliens or monsters, just hanging out with Aztecs, etc. Good stuff and fun to watch, imo. So long as you have a liking and tolerance for old stuff.
Side-rant: I absolutely hate what they did with the First Doctor in the Christmas Special of a few years ago where they made him cartoonishly sexist and prudish. He was never this in the original series. Worst he ever did was ask a woman to make him some tea (she was an office assistant, iirc) and threaten Susan with a "jolly good spanked bottom" (she was his grand-daughter). I mean the guy is from an advanced society where both male and female time lords appear to be treated entirely equally, have the same educational opportunities and on rare occasions, someone will spontaneously change sex on death. So WHY is he acting like a caricature of a sexist old man?
Second Doctor (Patrick Troughton). One of my favourite Doctors. Even more of a trouble-maker than the First Doctor. It is in his era that we first get hints of the Time Lords. He's a mischievous little imp and his adventures tend to be more consistently Sci-Fi than the First Doctor's. He also has two of the best companions in Jamie (a Scottish Highlander rescued from a battle) and Victoria (a very prim Victorian young lady). I can still hear their voices now as they sit on a space station in their distant future:
Jamie: "Did ye see what them wimmen were wearing, Victoria?"
Victoria: "Yes, Jamie. I did."
Jamie: "Do you ever imagine yeself might be wearin' something like that, Victoria?"
Victoria: "No, Jamie, I do not."
I've probably mangled the dialogue but they were a perfect foil to the Second Doctor.
Anyway, I find the Second Doctor run enjoyable. You might roll your eyes a little at the Thunderbirds level of special effects and ideas that seemed original then but have been heavily mined since. Still, it lays a lot of the groundwork of the Doctor Who lore and there were several call backs in NuWho to things introduced there (Great Intelligence comes to mind).
Third Doctor (Sean Pertwee): Probably budget reasons but for most of his run the Third Doctor is confined to Earth. He is not happy about this and makes sure to make everyone else aware that he is unhappy. This expands the lore of the Time Lords significantly and also introduces some key elements of the canon such as the Master. From the newcomers point of view I am in two minds as to recommend this as a good insertion point. There's some great stuff in here but also there's some terribly hammy stuff which is going to be either hilariously camp and amusing, or make you roll your eyes so hard coins come out your mouth. Such as the Doctor's space judo... alright, fine - Venusian Aikido. Same difference. I guess with what we know about the Doctor from later on we can surmise he was probably just trolling the people around him epically. At least that's my head-cannon and I'm sticking with it. Anyway, Three is your "Action Doctor". Interesting stuff from a lore perspective but brace yourself for long scenes of people driving cars or sailing boats and some mad hammyness. Also a giant, talking green penis.
We do get Sarah Jane. Deservedly one of the best companions. She carries through into the Fourth Doctor era. And even reappears in the Ten era. She's great. RIP Elizabeth Sladden, you are missed (and remained strangely hot even in your final years).
Fourth Doctor (Tom Baker). This is where Doctor Who really went off the wall. And I'm not talking about the terrible first story they did with the giant robot (the Fourth era does get much better, I promise). Where it went off the wall is that the Second and Third Doctors had both been sort of playing the same character. The idea of a personality change on regeneration hadn't been established. There were differences but not wildly exaggerated ones. Tom Baker was having none of that. He knew who he wanted to play and did so, scripts and directors be damned! And he was amazing. Terrifying, but amazing. Probably the most influential Doctor until Nine in terms of how they changed the character fundamentally. (Nine because it was post-Time War and this brought a very new trait to the Doctor - haunted by the past).
It's not Eighties but you could certainly enjoyably jump in here. The Fourth era contains many classics and also introduced another long-running character, Davros (creator of the Daleks). It's an extremely long run so there's plenty of good and bad in it. Just like there is in Tom Baker's spin on the Doctor. If I might make a suggestion, you could do worse than check out City of Death and Genesis of the Daleks as two good story arcs to try.
Fifth Doctor (Peter Davison). I didn't really like the Fifth Doctor so much when I was a kid. I found him kind of wishy-washy and weak. I don't know how re-watching it because he's anything but. The budgets and special effects in this era are almost legendarily bad. I can't think of anything particularly significant in terms of lore off the top of my head from this era, but I'm sure there is. Mainly my childhood memories are taken up with the pneumatic companion Perri that was introduced. Also, the Doctor playing Cricket. I do like the way he replies "Fast" when asked what sort of bowler he is. Very confident.
You'll need a strong tolerance for bad sets for some of this but there's some real gems in it. We also get Nyssa, the actress of which decided to remove her dress in her last story arc to "give the fans a treat". I liked Nyssa.
Sixth Doctor (Colin Baker, no relation). I have a great fondness for Six. Not only is the actor himself a wonderful human being whose magnanimous personality is matched only by his magnanimous waist, but the Big Finish audios he recorded are some of the best radio plays out there. I also really liked his Doctor. Unfortunately his initial storyline put a lot of people off. Five nearly died big time, barely able to regenerate. And its hinted that Six's instability and erratic initial behaviour are confusion from being so close to final death. But he certainly has some of the more violent outburts of any Doctor. It's hard to imagine Ten seeing someone tumble into a vat of acid and make a snarky quip about it.
Six's era is underrated, imo. Though I may be influenced by the audio dramas that he did later.
Blast - out of time. I might do more later if you're interested.