Off-Topic Drag Queen and Assorted LGBTQ Grooming Omnibus thread - The long-overdue hall of shame

  • 🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.
Explain what the purpose of pushing drag on kids is and how it benefits them.


"Kinda"? Desmond is Amazing was removing articles of clothing in a gay club as he danced for grown faggots who threw him money. Even the child beauty pageants at least maintained a veneer of plausible deniability, these faggots just can't help themselves. Just shut it all down, it's child exploitation.
lol @ you getting upset about "kinda"

We both agree that it's not appropriate for children, for various reasons.
 
Just in today:

School staff reportedly told to share information on students' gender transition with private company (archive)

EXCLUSIVE - A presentation given to counselors at a Texas school encouraged them to refer students, who wished to transition to one biological sex to another, directly to a private company rather than notifying the student’s parents, according to a letter sent from America First Legal to the school district.
According to the letter, during a "day of professional learning" at the Clear Creek Independent School District, a presentation was given regarding topics related to gender identity by a staff member from the Montrose Center, which "empowers our community—primarily [LGBTQ] individuals and their families—to live healthier, more fulfilling lives."
The letter, which was sent on behalf of an America First Legal client, noted that two weeks after the presentation, the school sent an email to counselors to "clarify district expectation as it relates to working with gay, lesbian, and transgender students." The email clarified that the school expects counselors to use state statute and school board policies "to guide their work, rather than the practices and graphics shared by the Montrose Center."

The Montrose Center has not released the contents of the presentation provided to the school counselors, according to the letter, "claiming that the presentation is proprietary intellectual property."


"However, the School District has taken no additional actions to secure the PowerPoint presentation slides and to comply with its responsibilities under the Texas Public Information Act," the letter continued.
Ian Prior, a senior adviser at America First Legal, told Fox News Digital that seeing the communication and contract between the school district and the Montrose Center was important to ensure the release of the presentation given to teachers.
"I would be pretty shocked if there was anything in there that actually prevented, or where the school district agreed that materials used in teacher trainings could not be provided to parents. Because that, in and of itself, could potentially be a violation of law," he said.


Prior noted that organizations across the country are making "significant amounts of money off of parents" by doing equity audits, or giving presentations to school staff on issues like critical race theory and gender identity.

"They're coming in, they're finding a problem that quite frankly doesn't exist, and then they ultimately provide these teacher trainings, they provide resources to the school, all to put in place this radical gender ideology that the vast majority of parents don't want being pushed on their children through these teacher trainings and other materials," he said.


Prior noted that school districts or external organizations like the Melrose Center citing copyright and intellectual property when denying requests from parents to see curriculum or teacher trainings has become common across the country.
"It's really absurd, because when you're talking about copyright protection, we're talking about people taking these materials and then using them for their own commercial gain. This is obviously very different than that, and would fall within fair use," he said. "So, it's up to the school ultimately to get those materials. They're the ones that brought in this contractor to conduct this training, and the school has an obligation to get those materials from the Montrose Center."


"Therefore, on behalf of its client Christine Parizo, AFL now demands that the School District take all steps necessary to disclose the training material provided by the Montrose Center," the letter said, additionally requesting all records related to the school’s partnership with the Montrose Center.
"The Montrose Center denies the allegations made by America First Legal regarding the contents of a professional learning presentation given by one our staff to Clear Creek ISD counselors. We do not provide medical care outside of behavioral healthcare, and would never ask school district staff to secretly refer children to us for any kind of transition-related medical services," a spokesperson for the Montrose Center told Fox News Digital. "We offer counseling and therapy to clients for a range of issues, including gender dysphoria, as well as offer a range of youth services including safe, educational spaces, mental health and wellness services, and recreational activities such as movie nights. While there have been strides in some states to restrict gender-affirming care for trans youth, it must be reiterated that gender-affirming care is backed by every major medical institution in the country. Further, gender-affirming medical decisions for trans youth should be carefully made between the youth, their parents/guardians, and their medical providers."


The Clear Creek Independent School District did not respond to Fox News’ request for comment.

I looked up the Montrose Center and they appear to have a variety of "youth" programs. The "Hatch (!!) Youth" program caters to ages 7-20 which is...notable.

1654193885541.png
 
"Incel" really doesn't have much power as an insult in a thread where a fair portion of the posters have a veritable boatload of children. It's almost like the people most worried about child grooming aren't basement-dwelling incels but parents who have a personal stake in raising children who aren't groomed to become adults' sexual playthings by rainbow flag-wavers telling them to "experiment."
 
We think it's fucked up when pre pubescent girls wear slut makeup, thongs, and micro skirts too. The only people who condone that shit are the phantom rural catcalling Christian that exist exclusively in your SSRI riddled brain.
There's also those kiddy beauty pageant sickos, but that's a whole other can of worms.
 
The one good thing about the Bible belt, fairly uncucked gun laws. There's even shooting clubs for gays!
lol while women are generally better in terms of form/accuracy at the range, women's proficiency generally crumbles under any kind of stress without a good bit of exposure to it. I actually feel bad for how funny I find it but I literally saw one start crying when an instructor was yelling in their (protected) ears. Literal limp wristed faggots are generally worse about it and also invite malfunction with said noodlewrists. If you care about a faggot and are advising them on a firearm suggest a wheel gun with no exposed hammer. They will have the finger-strength for the double-action's harder pull and there's a minimum of what they can fuck up.
 
"Incel" really doesn't have much power as an insult in a thread where a fair portion of the posters have a veritable boatload of children. It's almost like the people most worried about child grooming aren't basement-dwelling incels but parents who have a personal stake in raising children who aren't groomed to become adults' sexual playthings by rainbow flag-wavers telling them to "experiment."
And some of us are grandparents. Goddamned right I don't want any of my grandkids "groomed". No fucking way, Ike!
 
lol while women are generally better in terms of form/accuracy at the range, women's proficiency generally crumbles under any kind of stress without a good bit of exposure to it. I actually feel bad for how funny I find it but I literally saw one start crying when an instructor was yelling in their (protected) ears. Literal limp wristed faggots are generally worse about it and also invite malfunction with said noodlewrists. If you care about a faggot and are advising them on a firearm suggest a wheel gun with no exposed hammer. They will have the finger-strength for the double-action's harder pull and there's a minimum of what they can fuck up.
Did you seriously suggest that women can't shoot as good because of their fragile lady brains?

My guy, my pal, you're kinda telling everyone on the farms how little you've interacted with women.
 
Did you seriously suggest that women can't shoot as good because of their fragile lady brains?

My guy, my pal, you're kinda telling everyone on the farms how little you've interacted with women.
And here I was giving you the benefit of the doubt and assuming the "dumb dyke" comments were simple low jabs and not a frank assessment. If you manage to read and comprehend this explanation: I pretty specifically mentioned women not only demonstrate proficiency on the range but frequently excel at it. At the range, shooting while relaxed. What shocks me is the very demonstrable phenomenon of some women who are on-paper very qualified behaving like they have the same lack of intelligence that afflicts you once you add even a modicum of stress to the situation. I get people are different in real life but the way you come across here is like the lesbian even other BPD lesbians quickly tire of. It wouldn't surprise me if I've had more positive interactions with women than yourself.
 
I'd be just as wary having an incel around my kids. Maybe more.

If the choices for who my kids can hang around are incel or genderfucked they/them, I think I'd just take my kids to a bomb shelter and tell them the radiation would probably allow for re-emergence in 10-20 years or so.
 
You got slippery slope'd, my man. Drag has no place in children's media. It is inherently subversive to kids developing minds.
men in dresses is hilarious and could not be more traditional in children's entertainment

even in the US, where we don't have panto dames, we still have Mother Ginger played by a man every Christmas, you philistine
 
men in dresses is hilarious and could not be more traditional in children's entertainment

even in the US, where we don't have panto dames, we still have Mother Ginger played by a man every Christmas, you philistine
Speaking as an American of many years-

Who the fuck is "Mother Ginger"?
 
Back