Off-Topic Drag Queen and Assorted LGBTQ Grooming Omnibus thread - The long-overdue hall of shame

[Mega Man II Intro - GB]

Two mommies are often the ones exposing Heather to horrifying fetish shit

I suppose I should mention this book more often

Amazon.com: The Last Closet: The Dark Side of Avalon eBook : Greyland, Moira, Day, Vox: Books

Amazon.com: The Last Closet: The Dark Side of Avalon eBook : Greyland, Moira, Day, Vox: Books

www.amazon.com

all about how two BISEXUAL people married and with the love and support of their community molested their kids and other people's kids and were generally degenerate pieces of shit

I'm one of the lucky ones so if it seems like I go a little "hard" on the subject it's only because I know exactly what those kids are going through and how many of them do not want it.

You misunderstand, when I said gay people I meant all gays including the ones who oppose this shit.

They could organize and march for their "rights" but they can't organize and march against this? As far as I'm concerned they're complicit.

Draw a line and speak out, gays, because I'm not going to do it for you.

 

[Montalbane]

Fire up the woodchippers.
Its time to clean up the local pro-pedo infestation.

 

[Zero Day Defense]

Ain't a choice big boy. Your endocrine system don't work like that.

There's nothing about the endocrine system that by itself accommodates homosexuality, and in other animals-- for example, bonobos IIRC-- homosexuality is a sign of a deficiency in female bonobos... or a brain tumor.

Josh Duggar.

I'll be even more charitable than you and point out that there are more pedophiles in conservative/right-wing circles than Josh Duggar. But none of them think it's right. Any facilitation of it comes from turning a blind eye (which is itself contemptible by their own higher standards). It's outlier activity especially beyond the pale, and is treated as such-- contrast with reactions to the article topic, here, where there's actual controversy among presumed liberals in suggesting that children shouldn't be exposed to transvestite night shows and that others are weird for caring.

Also, considering we have people here like Gang Weeder who think non Christians deserve no civil rights,

At any point in time in America, did non-Christians not have civil rights? No? It was always constitutionally forbidden to institute any such statute?

Then maybe it doesn't matter to American policy that someone believes that non-Christians shouldn't have civil rights.

 

[Puff]

See, that's the issue.
Back in 2014 I was foolish enough to side more with the people like you. "Oh it's silly that gay marriage is banned as long as they just keep to themselves, after all, I don't care what they do in the bedroom"

Next year, SCOTUS makes it so.
Within less than a year the window shifted from "let the gays be gays" to "trannies are valid too!"

It only took a few years from that point, to shit like Cuties being pushed in the mainstream. Now we have public schools and fucking churches secretly busing kids to drag shows in strip bars and making them sign nonbinding kiddie NDAs promising they won't tell their parents about their explicit discussions about sexual preference. In some places, literal children are being charged with criminal offenses for not using some troons preferred pronouns. Parents are being targeted by laws meant for prosecuting actual fucking terrorists, simply for speaking out against it.

I'm just saying. You can feel how you want. I was once in the "live and let live" category when it was "I just want to have consensual sex with another consenting adult." Now that incidents like the topic of this thread are becoming more common, I've realized the slippery slope wasn't a fallacy here it was real, and we owe it to the next generation to do whatever we can to keep mentally unstable trannies from grooming them, even if that means going back to Don't Ask Dont Tell for the pillow biters.

Probably replying too far back in the thread, but this bugs the shit out of me and I'm quiet about it too much.
Nobody understands the "slippery slope fallacy". The true fallacy is that the slippery slope in itself is not "TRUE BY DEFINITION".
Like, it is an argument, but it isn't required to be true by logical laws. It's often true, but not required to be in every case. I swear this was made by commies and Nazis to silence opponents.

I'll also posit all late additions to logical fallacies that aren't in Latin are fake and gay and added to bludgeon opponents. Things like the "strawman fallacy" might be valid points but aren't fucking logical fallacies. What's logical or illogical about mischaracterizing your opponent's argument? It's a dirty tactic, but has nothing to do with logic either way.

 

[Exigent Circumcisions]

There's nothing about the endocrine system that by itself accommodates homosexuality

Look, just let the gays (and trannies) blame biology for their sexual escapades but we draw the line there. The fact that pedos are using the exact same argument means nothing, or at the very most it can only mean that pedos are highjacking the science to gain cover by using the exact same arguments and emotional appeals.

Hell of a coincidence, but that's all it is.

 

[Fek]

I think that in spite of the complete train wreck it became for many pages (why can people just not let unproductive pointless posts go?), this thread still gave great examples of how widespread the rot seems to be. The articles linked, personal testimonies, and the people who showed up to run interference especially. I am impressed, frankly, at the fact so many people showed up to derail the shit out of the discussion (though I'm not surprised at all as to who they ended up being).

I applaud your efforts at starting this thread, Larry.

 

[Meth Until Death]

Burlesque is is own thing entirely

Better than making them interact with catholic priests

Righto mingmong, you've admitted to never wanting to have kids (they're parasites, crotch goblins etc etc) yet you're throwing out your ten cents on how normal people raise their kids, including who gets to interact with them. Why are you so interested in how others raise their kids when you have no intention to do so?

 

[LurkNoMore]

Why are you so interested in how others raise their kids when you have no intention to do so?

Because she and every other homo knows good and well their shit won't be accepted till everyone is doing it. And the only to insure that is to abuse as many kids as possible.

 

[Colonel Gaddafi]

Dear fag hags itt. Take it back to the Beauty Parlor. Nobody cares that some dude looked at your tits when you were 14 and you now have a complex in your BPD, Prozac addled brain because of it. We don’t want to hear about how you hate fundies and want to kill babies because you’re still salty that mummy made you go to vacation Bible school. What we do care about is that you’re defending faggot nonces who are apparently cool in your book because they’re molesting boys. That makes you a groomer by accessory.

 

[Android raptor]

Righto mingmong, you've admitted to never wanting to have kids (they're parasites, crotch goblins etc etc) yet you're throwing out your ten cents on how normal people raise their kids, including who gets to interact with them. Why are you so interested in how others raise their kids when you have no intention to do so?

Because my parents and the parents of many people I know did a terrible job of it, enough that it left their kids with a variety of trauma-related mental illnesses.

Plus the real reason conservatives and fundies try to paint all gays as pedophiles is because they don't want people noticing they're up to their eyeballs in sex pests. Same as male feminists calling random dudes misogynists, it's like the nonce version of troll shielding.

View attachment 3357138
There are people in this very thread who apparently don't think there is anything wrong with this.

Keep your kids away from such people.

That's not appropriate, but I'm also pretty sure that's actually a TRUE and HONEST woman, not a drag queen, given the talk about burlesque instead of drag.

why do you braindead politispergs call everyone you don't like pedos?

Projection

 

[Puff]

it's like the nonce version of troll shielding.

Projection

Is this double projection? That's cool.

While I fucking hate the Catholic Church, the priesthood seems to have about the same rate of noncery as all major corporations. The coverup by the Vatican was the actual unusual thing there that people should be worried about.

You know what group has a disproportionate amount of pedos? Public school teachers.

 

[Positron]

99% of the people on A&H don't want gays to literally be killed

At this moment in time this is probably true. However I cannot guarantee it to hold if the gays pulls a few more cake stunts, and poke their pedodicks out like the San Francisco Gay Men Chorus did.

 

[Android raptor]

Is this double projection? That's cool.

While I fucking hate the Catholic Church, the priesthood seems to have about the same rate of noncery as all major corporations. The coverup by the Vatican was the actual unusual thing there that people should be worried about.

You know what group has a disproportionate amount of pedos? Public school teachers.

Public school teachers are just more likely to get reported/arrested than religious pedos. Most pedos in religious communities are never even reported to law enforcement, because those communities circle the wagons around them beyond even what troons/SJWs do. The kinda shit the Duggars did to protect their nonce son is the norm in those communities. For every pedo that gets v& in a fundie community, there are probably a hundred more that will never even be reported to the cops.

I doubt we'll even know the full extent of pedos in the Catholic church because I'm sure only a small percentage were ever taken to court.

Some nonce bullshit religious whackos do openly tho, like trying to force little girls to gestate chomo embryos (or being in favor of it).

At this moment in time this is probably true. However I cannot guarantee it to hold if the gays pulls a few more cake stunts, and poke their pedodicks out like the San Francisco Gay Men Chorus did.

Damn if A&H hates pedos that much, you'd think they'd want to go full minecraft on all organized religious groups.

 

[NJBear]

 

[Puff]

The kinda shit the Duggars did to protect their nonce son is the norm in those communities. For every pedo that gets v& in a fundie community, there are probably a hundred more that will never even be reported to the cops.

No it isn't. Normal things don't get extensive news coverage and if they're covering it up well enough to not get in trouble you're just guessing.

I doubt we'll even know the full extent of pedos in the Catholic church because I'm sure only a small percentage were ever taken to court.

Once again, that means you're just guessing. I mean, The priesthood IS a traditional place to hide your gays who have a very high rate of child rape, so maybe you're onto something.

Some nonce bullshit religious whackos do openly tho, like trying to force little girls to gestate chomo embryos (or being in favor of it).

Damn if A&H hates pedos that much, you'd think they'd want to go full minecraft on all organized religious groups.

If there is a group like that, they probably deserve the wall. Unless you're just misrepresenting pro-life views, in which case, you're dumb. Also you're lumping all religious people into one group. Dumb.

 

[Android raptor]

View attachment 3358526

While this is definitely not appropriate, another screencap posted about this talked about burlesque, not drag, which makes me think this might be a (creepy AF)TRUE and HONEST woman.

No it isn't. Normal things don't get extensive news coverage and if they're covering it up well enough to not get in trouble you're just guessing.

Educated guessing based on the fact that I live in the Bible belt and have talked to a shitton of people who were raised in conservative religious groups and got molested (only for the pedo to get protected and enabled by the church).

Pretty much all fundies are beating and psychologically abusing their kids, and I'd say it's roughly 50/50 that someone is molesting them as well. I swear at least half of older fundie dudes are some variety of sex pest.

Read Quiverfull General if you'd like to know more.

 

[Zero Day Defense]

While I fucking hate the Catholic Church, the priesthood seems to have about the same rate of noncery as all major corporations.

Most likely less than public schools, at this point.

I find it difficult to believe that an institution brimming with teachers believing themselves to be doing a moral good by exposing your children to age-inappropriate material and deleterious ideas that lead into the shadow of a plastic surgeon's scalpel, doesn't have more sex offenders than an institution whose founder (and sole supreme deity) said that people who hurt children would be better off thrown into an ocean.

In both cases, the number of actual sex offenders is going to be a stark minority. But there's nothing moral among teachers and their adjacents that will rein in their corruption of the minds of children, there's nothing in the law that's currently doing so in most places, and they believe themselves to be moral as they expose children to age-inappropriate material and seek to sexually confuse even kindergartners under the pretense/delusional belief of helping them.

 

[Official Windex]

It seems like the real contention here is some kind of slap fight between whether one community or another is guilty of harboring groomers and pedophiles. Someone who's far gone enough to rape kids is already forfeiting a traditional human understanding of fellowship to any group in particular and I don't think it's unfair to try to understand what they do as a means to abuse rather than any ideology or spiritual thing. In that way, strongly religious communities were a great way to go for that because people were (or are) naive enough to think that evil wouldn't penetrate so deeply. However, most would agree that is on the decline. In the interim a new avenue of shielded grooming seems to arising where any investigation can be explained away as some kind of hoax or dangerous stereotype, defended with as much religious fervor.

As people become less religious and those communities become less untouchable (no matter how slowly) it's only natural that a deranged molester would seek a different community to shape shift through. I don't want to speak for everyone in the thread, but I think most people are here to identify what seems to be a "trendy" and "novel" way to get away with it.

 

[Jimjamflimflam]

Why are you so interested in how others raise their kids when you have no intention to do so?

Its fucking strange how many childless wierdos think they get to have a say in how to raise other people children on the false personal belief that they know better even though they have no kids, nor a desire too.

 

[Android raptor]

Its fucking strange how many childless wierdos think they get to have a say in how to raise other people children on the false personal belief that they know better even though they have no kids, nor a desire too.

Wild how child abuse survivors don't want other kids to go through what they or people they know went through, so strange