Whoever wrote it should also axe the booru screenshots. From looking at the site's source the images are apparently blurred based on their filenames, but anyone reading a web page with a spoiler that basically says "click here to see drawn CP", are going to GTFO. Especially since they are behind <summary> tags, so the images have already been downloaded to your computer at that point
.
Speaking of which, from a Google search the site got posted to HN, but the post was apparently immediately killed
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41925345 [
A]
Overall a B for effort, D for execution. Hopefully they take the points in this thread on board.
This. Don't make people think they will be caching and viewing Drew's CSAM content into their browser as people could be viewing the report from their work computers and they will just close it off before making it past the warning and spoilers. I think the report and screenshots of the website is more for people on Twitter, Mastodon, or even replies to other related threads regarding the rms report website. The website serves people the ability to confirm the authenticity of the statements. As a main post of it's own, it will just look like the same thing Drew tried to do which was just attack RMS for the hell of it, and it will just get removed as Reddit and HN block such off-topic activity. Normally, HN would have deleted the original rms report link because it falls under this, but I think the mods left it up on purpose because it was revealed in the comments who was behind it and all the other DNS/SSL info and they found the information in the comments to be of greater importance considering it was breaking the rules.
People will read the website and screenshots from it on social media and try to dismiss it because of multiple sources where the information was gathered from, but them trying to dismiss it in this manner actually helps the website's case. You will be able to point out how they read it or screenshots from it, and then decided to attack and try to dismiss the messenger instead of the actual messages themselves, which is Drew's political statements and his loli activity including hosting and operating the now defunct loli csam bot.
Also, on top of attack-the-messenger and dismissal attempt, be on the lookout for the
Non-apology apology and the non-denial denial as in the inability to deny outright that Drew wasn't behind the verifyable statements and what ever excuse comes right after it to avoid talking about the statements.
tl;dr, but not really tl;dr: Don't stoop to the RMS report's level and promote the website in the same off-topic manner as it will just get flagged and deleted. Show people excerpts from it, give people the source to verify the authenticity of Drew's statements (the website where they can find an archive link to it), and let them decide for themselves how they feel about it or what they want to do with the information. Putting myself in their shoes, I know it would disturb me to find out someone who is associated with the RMS report and a colleague (Drew DeVault) could be capable of such statements and disturbing activity given his pledges to maintain such high ethical standards as the ones outlined in Open Source organizations and the report. Anyone who read the RMS report and commented that they were shocked by it, should be reading this one too as they should also be shocked by it too and be making a similar statement as it is possibly way worse than anything in the RMS one.
Great work by the way who ever is responsible for the website. It gives people the ability to take a step back and realize just who they are associated with.
Let me guess, people who backed the RMS report on statements that were already addressed years ago, are they also going to fain "active ignorance" to one of the launchers of the report and their activities given that they supported the RMS report? A normal, "moral", and ethical person, especially one who is associated with Drew DeVault would denounce Drew's statements in the same manner or not? The hypocrisy and double standard almost deserves a screenshot collection of it's own lol. Anyone who is made aware of the DeVault report and doesn't give a statement on it the same way they did the RMS report, is guilty of the exact same thing, if not worse because they already confirmed they are "moral" and "ethical" by denouncing RMS. I would even go as far as even saying the deletion of a comment or post by them, of them being made aware of the DeVault report or excerpts from it, and not giving a statement on it, is already such an admission of hypocrisy and "active ignorance". Oh the irony
.
I read somewhere that BryanLunduke, DistroTube, and other vloggers who covered the report were made aware of the DeVault report already? I can confidently confirm BryanLunduke is already aware of it. I'm not sure about the others as I only saw a correspondence confirmation from BryanLunduke when someone reached out to him about the website for comment.
.
.
