Drew Chadwick DeVault / ddevault / SirCmpwn - Opinionated white-male-guilt-ridden software developer. Cancelled Hyprland and slandered it as "toxic" and transphobic. Hates X11 users and Hacker News. Lolicon.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Drew is a fucking blight who contributes nothing and tries to take down actual contributors to open source. Parasites like him need to get the boot. Its not surprising he's trying to pull this shit on Stallman just like he's tried to fuck with Vaxxry because Hyprland is better than Sway. Stallman is a much bigger name with alot of loyal devotees, hopefully this gets more attention on Drew and helps show what a useless hack he is.
 
What's the context here? I don't see a link to the post this comment is on. And yeah, this is pretty horrible, I think I've written about it before, but I don't like the idea of routine medical interventions that require significant skilled effort to remove. Sure, if someone's ill and needs treatment that's one thing, but here there was nothing wrong with the girl in the first place.

Stitches on skin can by removed by someone with steady hands with pretty minimal tools, and braces for teeth can be inactivated by cutting the wires, something that's not super hard to do, but how am I supposed to remove an IUD in an emergency situation with highly dubious sanitary conditions, assuming the former 14 year old even remembers about it?
I think the context is he wants to fuck kids bro and this is his way of saying it without saying it.
 
1729361911923.jpeg

1729361927901.jpeg
This face? A pederast? Who could’ve seen this coming?
 
What's the context here? I don't see a link to the post this comment is on.
The archive is of a page on Drew's reddit profile that contains that comment (click the link and Ctrl-F "14"). Clicking "context" under that comment takes you to the parent post, which is "Joke or not, people like this should not be allowed to breed." (OP post is 2013-era reddit ragebait).
 
Stallman is a lolcow but doesn’t deserve any of this bullshit.
I hate how the spergy software engineer gigachad pest autists with principles, like Stallman, get pushed out by intellectual lightweight snivelling pest autists who occasionally luck out and get social clout kowtowing to weirdo zeitgeists. The only thing to look forward to is that Drew, like all his ilk, will one day be put against the wall by his "allies."
 
Just look at what he said about the Epstein stuff, can’t blame autism on that.
Why don't you, and read the whole thing? What he says is that he doesn't think sexual assault or rape would be a fair label to place on his dead friend, as in his mind, he was a rich man on another rich mans plane who was trying to use young, but to his knowledge legal, women to gain influence over him and other influential men. He doesn't say it's okay. He's trying to make a murder vs manslaughter type argument which the is quite fair, especially as there's no evidence his mate ever even had sexual with them.
 
Just look at what he said about the Epstein stuff, can’t blame autism on that.
What’s with this fucking thing where people go „you can’t blame the really bad stuff on mental conditions“? Redditors do this all the time when a video of some obviously schizophrenic and psychotic homeless guy saying the n word shortly before being curb stomped by a brotha gets posted.

This is EXACTLY the kind of shit an autist would say, said in EXACTLY the way an autist would say it. Incredibly literal, stream of consciousness documentation outside his area of expertise, constructed in a purely theoretical worldview that is not at all applicable to the complexities of real world social interactions, and zero understanding how normies will feel reading this shit.
Completely aside from the true point he made that human slavery is not always recognizable to a passing observer.

Stallmann is one of the RARE actual autists. I say „actual“, because most autists you will meet nowadays (both clinical and self diagnosed) are actually this strange new breed of introverted low-selfesteem narcissists, not autistic at all.
 
Why don't you, and read the whole thing? What he says is that he doesn't think sexual assault or rape would be a fair label to place on his dead friend, as in his mind, he was a rich man on another rich mans plane who was trying to use young, but to his knowledge legal, women to gain influence over him and other influential men. He doesn't say it's okay. He's trying to make a murder vs manslaughter type argument which the is quite fair, especially as there's no evidence his mate ever even had sexual with them.
You can read it here https://stallmansupport.org/docs/csail-emails-reordered.pdf
I think it’s a retarded hill to die on defending a pedophile buddy while attempting to broaden a nonexistent distinction between rape and sex with a minor. If you condense his fatuitous wording you get drawn to the same conclusion.

If an old geezer goes to Thailand to fuck 13 year olds he’s a pedophile. That shouldn’t change because of legal technicalities he may inform himself of to feel comfortable in the dissonance of his actions.
 
I hate how the spergy software engineer gigachad pest autists with principles, like Stallman, get pushed out by intellectual lightweight snivelling pest autists who occasionally luck out and get social clout kowtowing to weirdo zeitgeists. The only thing to look forward to is that Drew, like all his ilk, will one day be put against the wall by his "allies."
The problem is the former will absolutely stand up to corpo-retard spergouts like what happened to Red Hat and Mozilla while the latter will always align with the ‘right side of history’ and get assraped by greedy corporate assholes who have no ethics beyond ‘does this get us more revenue for this quarter?’
 
If you go on Epstein’s plane and decide you want to do that again you’re retarded and you deserve negative association. Birds of a feather flock together.
...but his entire point is that his friend was being called a rapist and that he commited sexual assault, of which there is no evidence. Even Stallman in his own emails says he doesn't agree with what Epstein did.
 
...but his entire point is that his friend was being called a rapist and that he commited sexual assault, of which there is no evidence. Even Stallman in his own emails says he doesn't agree with what Epstein did.
Therefore his argument is contradictive and dumb. Are you going to tell me Epstein didn’t have young children on the plane? If he was a honeypot why would he not establish kompromat secluded in the air within a plane full of hidden cameras. If his argument falls on the fallacy of no bad deed happening then shouldn’t everyone on the flight logs be expunged of their connection?
 
Therefore his argument is contradictive and dumb. Are you going to tell me Epstein didn’t have young children on the plane? If he was a honeypot why would he not establish kompromat secluded in the air in a plane full of hidden cameras. If his argument falls on the fallacy of no bad deed happening then shouldn’t everyone on the flight logs be expunged of their connection?
This literally makes no logical sense. I have not defended Epstein and in Stallman's own emails, he also says he thinks what Epstein did was wrong and that it's clear he was using children.

You're making up what you want my posts to say and replying to that, the same as you did with Stallmans emails.
 
This literally makes no logical sense. I have not defended Epstein and in Stallman's own emails, he also says he thinks what Epstein did was wrong and that it's clear he was using children.

You're making up what you want my posts to say and replying to that, the same as you did with Stallmans emails.
I’m not making up any of what you said, I’m asking a question in response. You can form your own opinions, I even posted the full email chain.

Stallman is a bad friend that can’t scrutinize a colleague’s poor decisions and therefore makes me want to question Stallman’s own judgement. How many times is it okay to go on a known pedophile glow agent’s private airplane? Is the limit <= 1?
 
Back