DSP Reacts/Rewrites History!: The John Rambo and Howard Video [June 4th, 2022]

the guy with no fucking friends is talking about friendship? YOURE A PIECE OF SHIT PHIL. fuck people over anyhow you can. and you think theyre just gonna keep getting fucked over by you out of friendship? nah mate, go fuck yourself
This secret animosity for Howard kind of proves what i said. Did talks like he didn't even know Howard and he was just a background NPC in DSP's life yet they played games when John wasn't around. You can't really trust anything he says because he will tell a story 30 different ways and somehow pretend you're stupid for not understanding it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Big Brown Schlub
Just the last thing about this on my part, this is what happened in detail that day, according to these sources:
TL,DR:
At approx. 1AM March 26 - 1999, Lamont Baldwin (driver), Ricky Owen, and Lamont Thergood (murderer) were driving along Knowlton Street when they stopped so that Thergood would get out and urinate, he would then encounter Telerence Carter (Tee) and shoot him. According to Owen, Thergood was standing in front of Tee, whose "hands were raised" before being shot with a revolver 4 times.

One officer heard the shots so he went there, almost hitting their car. He then started pursuing them until they went to a dead end, reinforcements came and arrested them.

According to one of the detectives testimony, he overheard Thergood's conversation when he was on the phone on the police station, saying that he "shot the dude for no reason".
The other detective also heard part of the conversation, saying: "Mom", "I did it", "I shot him", and "no reason".

(The rest and other details are in the page, if anyone cares)
 
Well, exactly. :story:

Although I could be cynical and say, if he had been a good friend all those years ago, he'd be able to weaponize it against people like Howard who called him a shit friend. Not that his dents need to be convinced, they sided with Phil anyway.
Such great friends that the only thing I know about the dude was that he was probably black, and he played Street Fighter with Phil a few times or some shit.

Nothing about any hooligan shit outside that you would typical friend do like go skateboarding, or hit on girls at the mall. Or go fuckin climb a tree or something. Nope, shut in only played Street Fighter with him. Great friends huh.
 
Last edited:
Such great friends that the only thing I know about the dude was that he was probably black, and he played Street Fighter with Phil a few times or some shit.

Nothing about any hooligan shit outside that that typical friends do like go skateboarding, or hit on girls at the mall. Or go fuckin climb a tree or something. Nope, shut in only played Street Fighter with him. Great friends huh.
To this day he thinks his old closest buddy who makes him cry at his mere memory was gunned down by a gang as a initiation ritual.
 
Tee's headstone is pretty sad.
Christ that's depressing. Tee headstone fund when
If DSP was such a true friend, he could actually directly change stuff like this. But nope, he needed thousands of dollars in toys.
This really tells you all you need to know about DSP. Like does he have to help? No, of course not, but you'd think if someone's death hit you that hard, and you cared about them and valued them that much you might want to help. You make 6 figs and can't be bothered to pay for your good friends headstone, when clearly his fam can't afford it? That's fine but you probably didn't care nearly as much as you virtue signal
 
Having caught up with this thread, I really thought my opinion on Phil couldn't sink any lower but here we are. A near decade after he burned his bridges with them and almost a full seven years after they exposed him, Phil decides to finally to respond and only shows how much of a borderline manipulative psychopath he is.

I never even heard of the Tee stuff until now since I don't remember the video that Howard mentioned watching. But damn Phil.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Big Brown Schlub
Tee's headstone is pretty sad.
If DSP was such a true friend, he could actually directly change stuff like this. But nope, he needed thousands of dollars in toys.
If any of you special detractor streamers want to do something that would really piss Phil off while also doing something good, you should do a special stream to raise funds for a proper headstone.

You can even take this idea.
 
Oh lord, please no one do an embarrassing SoK water well stunt with an actual murder victims grave

To this day he thinks his old closest buddy who makes him cry at his mere memory was gunned down by a gang as a initiation ritual.

This is weird to me. I mean, I'm no psychologist and I get that people deal with things differently, but I had a friend who was, unfortunately, murdered and I followed the hell out of that trial. It's so weird to think of someones best friend getting murdered and them knowing nothing about what actually happened. He got the way they were caught wrong (said it was a taxi, a cop was literally right by the crime) and to this day he doesn't know the actual circumstances of the crime. I'm being generous, though, and hoping it's just avoidance as a means of dealing with trauma or something?

Just the last thing about this on my part, this is what happened in detail that day, according to these sources:
TL,DR:
At approx. 1AM March 26 - 1999, Lamont Baldwin (driver), Ricky Owen, and Lamont Thergood (murderer) were driving along Knowlton Street when they stopped so that Thergood would get out and urinate, he would then encounter Telerence Carter (Tee) and shoot him. According to Owen, Thergood was standing in front of Tee, whose "hands were raised" before being shot with a revolver 4 times.

One officer heard the shots so he went there, almost hitting their car. He then started pursuing them until they went to a dead end, reinforcements came and arrested them.

According to one of the detectives testimony, he overheard Thergood's conversation when he was on the phone on the police station, saying that he "shot the dude for no reason".
The other detective also heard part of the conversation, saying: "Mom", "I did it", "I shot him", and "no reason".

(The rest and other details are in the page, if anyone cares)

I read a bit of one of the links (https://casetext.com/case/thergood-v-warden-state-prison-no-cv-03-0004206-aug) and there was something interesting. The link is a summary of a judgment about a petition by the murderer saying his habeas corpus rights were violated. This section jumped out at me:

Attorney Skyers was well aware of the petitioner's limitations, through his own interaction with the petitioner and the information obtained from the petitioner's family and school records. He specifically argued at the suppression hearing that the petitioner's waiver of his Miranda rights was involuntary based, in part, on his inability to understand these rights as they were explained to him.

Does anyone with more legal knowledge than me (or any actual lawyers) know what this might encompass? I'd assume the court agreeing that someone had inability to understand Miranda rights would only be in cases of something like mental disabilities?
 
Does anyone with more legal knowledge than me (or any actual lawyers) know what this might encompass? I'd assume the court agreeing that someone had inability to understand Miranda rights would only be in cases of something like mental disabilities?
Basically, the shooter is arguing that he lacked the mental capacity (too stupid and/or mentally ill) to understand what he was doing by waiving his Miranda rights and that his appointed defender failed to competently and zealously argue that point, even though the attorney had enough evidence that he should have known to make that argument. The significance of not understanding the Miranda waiver is that all of the confession would likely become inadmissible since it was obtained during questioning and was not a spontaneous admission (not clear if the phone call referenced would have fallen under that as well).

The court seems to have found that the attorney did fuck up but that the attorney's fuck up did not substantially change the outcome of the case. In other words, although the attorney should have challenged the Miranda waiving, there was enough other evidence (looks like at least 2 eyewitnesses in the car with the shooter plus the cop hearing the shooting) that the shooter would likely still have been found guilty.
 
Figure since this is brought up, this is what DSP said online 2 decades ago about T's death:
https://archive.ph/xXALE
View attachment 3379352

Responding to someone that made a disrespectful joke.
https://archive.ph/z2UM2
View attachment 3379353

https://archive.ph/tudEw
View attachment 3379355

https://archive.ph/kQcuC
View attachment 3379357
So Phil was 16 when Tee died, about 3 weeks away from turning 17. He likely knew Tee less than a year and yet is claiming here "we grew up together".

It seems more like Tee was an acquaintance whose death Young Narc Phil latched on to with the way he pretends they were much closer than they actually were and then will bring up his death when he needs pity points to 'win' an argument like he did with Viscant later in these forum posts and how he did with Howard about monetizing Scott's death.

Likely he was shocked by Tee's death and then his disordered Narc brain made it about himself and will use it as fodder to feed his ego and excuse his bad behavior.
 
I'll say he wasn't shocked at all given he has claimed his hood was crime central. Unless he was lying that is.
The neighborhood where his parents lived was alright but just a few blocks down was the worst, most crime-infested shithole part of Bridgeport. What's funny is that the situation is similar in Renton. You can pass just a single city block and you'd go from an alright neighborhood to the shittiest part of Renton. Reminds me of how in Brazil opulent mansions can be right next to a favela, separated by a huge wall. Of course, Bridgeport and Renton are nowhere near extreme of an example of that.
 
The neighborhood where his parents lived was alright but just a few blocks down was the worst, most crime-infested shithole part of Bridgeport. What's funny is that the situation is similar in Renton. You can pass just a single city block and you'd go from an alright neighborhood to the shittiest part of Renton. Reminds me of how in Brazil opulent mansions can be right next to a favela, separated by a huge wall. Of course, Bridgeport and Renton are nowhere near extreme of an example of that.
Well I was curious, and it does turn out that crime in Renton is on the rise, especially in comparison to the average rate of crime in Seattle, the highest form of crime is definently property crime, but pretty sure Pig roach should be nice and safe couped up in his gated community. Luckily for him he doesn't live in Tukwila, which has some of the worst crime overall in the Seattle metro area.
 
Well I was curious, and it does turn out that crime in Renton is on the rise, especially in comparison to the average rate of crime in Seattle, the highest form of crime is definently property crime, but pretty sure Pig roach should be nice and safe couped up in his gated community. Luckily for him he doesn't live in Tukwila, which has some of the worst crime overall in the Seattle metro area.
Yeah as shit as Renton is it can't even crack the top 10 worst towns/cities to live in WA state. Seattle itself, Centralia, Aberdeen, Tukwila, Kelso are even worse. By an order of magnitude even.

Property crime is what makes Renton so bad but it also skews the statistics for the crime rate. I remember checking how bad Bridgeport was compared to Renton and the crime rate is actually worse in Renton, but it's because property crime is completely out of control there, violent crime is worse in Bridgeport.
 
Now what was it he said about Rambo and money but it was really Howard?

 
Back