Dumb Shit on Wikipedia

Save the Loli said:
I think Wikipedia gets away with it because the porn/explicit content is nominally for artistic and informative purposes, kind of like a high school anatomy textbook or what's shown in a sex-ed class for teens
Click to expand...
Lmao remember the "seedfeeder" guy who constantly put his pictures of white dudes getting sucked off by Asian chicks into every article even remotely relevant?
 
  • Like
  • Lunacy
  • Winner
Reactions: Eurasian Lynx, milk, Effluvial Ooze and 11 others
The right way to do this would be to require a log in for all porn sites (so no public freebies) - and even in cases where the content was 'free' (probably copyright violations mostly anyway), require age verification via a debit card charge - ie a pre authorization of 1 dollar, which is then refunded. There are plenty of sites that do this for verification now, there is no reason it can't be done for pornography. I'd even go one further and require all porno sites to be .xxx domain.

For too long anti-porno activists had an all-or-nothing approach of a total ban or anarchy like we have now, restricting the content and segregating it off from the 'normal' internet as much as possible is the most desirable.
 
  • Islamic Content
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: Eurasian Lynx, Toolbox, Chongqing and 4 others
Wikipedia admin moment
wikipedia.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Eurasian Lynx, Elim Garak, Toolbox and 11 others
  • Islamic Content
  • Like
  • Lunacy
Reactions: Eurasian Lynx, Effluvial Ooze, Toolbox and 6 others
I find it amusing that after the first facial image faced backlash for racism and "promoting violence against women", Seedfeeder had the image tweaked so he could flip that woman's frown upside down.

Semfac01.png
sigsegvcopypasta2.png

Of course, this was before the image was replaced entirely with the (slightly) less offensive one.
 
  • Lunacy
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Eurasian Lynx, Elim Garak, Toolbox and 8 others
AnOminous said:
Meanwhile, they zealously protect articles about absolute nobodies like Brianna Wu, despite the articles being of near zero quality and being entirely filled with lies about the subject.
Click to expand...
I bet if you argued with the mods and admins of the site that her page is not needed, you'd get a bunch of responses that you're being "biased" and not having a "neutral POV" because "she is important".

All I know is that their rules and policies get thrown out the window the moment a veteran user, mod or admin decides that everything is wrong. Who cares if the source is likely biased and the info provided is dubious? Facts don't matter when pertaining to a trannies dead name and so on.

Also, what exactly is the point of having stuff like this on their profile pages?
icon 2.PNG
 
Last edited:
  • Horrifying
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Eurasian Lynx, Pope Julius IV, Elim Garak and 9 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back