Dumb Shit on Wikipedia

Of course she was credited as Ellen Page! They're making it sound like it was a typo and not just bc she wasn't trans yet.
1627424364493.png
 
Is there a reason why whenever a "respected" Wikipedia user dislikes another user's edits, they comb through said users entire editing history to revert any edit that they disagree with and "warn" them about Wikipedia's policies?

I have legit seem people who cited sources have their edits reverted simply because a "respected" user disagreed with one of their edits and went on a reverting spree. They claim that they're "breaking some Wikipedia policy", but that seems like a load of bs.
 
Is there a reason why whenever a "respected" Wikipedia user dislikes another user's edits, they comb through said users entire editing history to revert any edit that they disagree with and "warn" them about Wikipedia's policies?

I have legit seem people who cited sources have their edits reverted simply because a "respected" user disagreed with one of their edits and went on a reverting spree. They claim that they're "breaking some Wikipedia policy", but that seems like a load of bs.
It's just as you say - it's a pretense to get them topic banned or banned outright. They also like to throw spurious sockpuppet investigations as a weapon against the same people.

To combat all of this? You have to wade into nerd slap fights on the talk pages - something normal people don't have the time for. That's how wikipedia came to be edited by an army of sexual degenerates and other losers who don't have lives and can participate in endless online debates.
 
Of course she was credited as Ellen Page! They're making it sound like it was a typo and not just bc she wasn't trans yet.
View attachment 2384586
This is retarded your going to have to aklowedge that she was once female. She legit played in a movie where a girl gets pregnant. Stop pretending she was always trans. Seriously I'm sick and tired of trannies
 
Is there a reason why whenever a "respected" Wikipedia user dislikes another user's edits, they comb through said users entire editing history to revert any edit that they disagree with and "warn" them about Wikipedia's policies?

I have legit seem people who cited sources have their edits reverted simply because a "respected" user disagreed with one of their edits and went on a reverting spree. They claim that they're "breaking some Wikipedia policy", but that seems like a load of bs.
As far as I can tell, the average Wikipedia user has no job, is an autist, an " expert " with a stick up his ass, a SJW, or is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome.

Plus, they have an labyrinth of rules that normies can't begin to comprehend.
 
Plus, they have an labyrinth of rules that normies can't begin to comprehend.
Even if you do, they'll just accuse you of "rules lawyering" if you actually expect them to adhere to their autistic fake bullshit "rules." The only real rule is whichever autist screeches the loudest wins.
 
So you know how Wikipedia articles on people have an autstic documentation on their early life and parents right?

Take a look at the late Sir Christopher Lee for example
chriss lee.JPG

I decided to check out our buddy Mr. Schwab over at the WEF and well


schwab.JPG

Fucking nothing on his family, if he had siblings, where he went to school, etc. Just his university shit and beyond. Then you have the section on the Great Reset which apparently linked to another page about deboonked conspiracy theories on the GR

klaus.JPG

Speaking of which, seems like Wikipedians want a dedicated page for deboonking the Great Reset as anything other than an elitist power grab. Discussions thread linked below.
speaking of which.JPG

 
Fucking nothing on his family, if he had siblings, where he went to school, etc. Just his university shit and beyond. Then you have the section on the Great Reset which apparently linked to another page about deboonked conspiracy theories on the GR
If you look at other major Jewish elites you can see the same thing. They started deleting their personal histories after the right-wing meme "Check his Early Life" started gaining prominence.
 
If you look at other major Jewish elites you can see the same thing. They started deleting their personal histories after the right-wing meme "Check his Early Life" started gaining prominence.
People who aren't related to art/entertainment/philosophy tend to have short or nonexistent Early Life in general. Julian Simon (very important economist) for example has no Early Life section at all, just Personal Life that is just some stuff about his wife, depression, death and also the sentence
Simon was Jewish.

People from outside of America tend to have shorter articles in general, when the two effects overlap we get the expected result of (selection: Wilhelm Röpke and economists linked in his article's lead):
Wilhelm Röpke - Life section with no Early Life-related info
Alfred Müller-Armack - no separation of article into sections, garbage style, no Early Life-related info
Alexander Rüstow - Life section, birth then jump to university, no family info
Walter Eucken - LOTS of info, but he was a famous philosopher's son
Franz Böhm - Early Life present, little info

Also, assuming I didn't fuck up my WikiBlame queries somehow, "jew" was apparently most recently removed from Klaus Schwab's page in November 2020 and the edit was removing an unsourced list of awards that contained a name of a jewish ngo (https://archive.is/qY96e).
The logs don't seem to have any edit visibility changes in them. (An edit visibility change looks like this: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=Bottlenose+dolphin and makes the revisions inaccessible to users)
 

"Trump promoted the QAnon conspiracy theory" god wikipedia you are such utter fucking garbage. No wonder Google, Amazon and others are happy to farm their little infoboxes in search results out to these Wikiheads - only they could get away with borderline defamatory statements like that.

Honestly, that article there is approaching Rational Wiki levels of stupidity, I am not even sure what it is claiming to have debunked - that some people thought the COVID measures might be used as a power grab?
 
"Trump promoted the QAnon conspiracy theory" god wikipedia you are such utter fucking garbage. No wonder Google, Amazon and others are happy to farm their little infoboxes in search results out to these Wikiheads - only they could get away with borderline defamatory statements like that.

Honestly, that article there is approaching Rational Wiki levels of stupidity, I am not even sure what it is claiming to have debunked - that some people thought the COVID measures might be used as a power grab?
he did. out of all the retarded shit on wikipedia why are you upset about something he actually did?
 
Is there a reason why whenever a "respected" Wikipedia user dislikes another user's edits, they comb through said users entire editing history to revert any edit that they disagree with and "warn" them about Wikipedia's policies?
The venn diagram of wikipedos and redditors is practically a circle, and that's practically standard procedure for reddit witch hunts.
 
Back