Dumb Shit on Wikipedia

At least it didn't include "schoolteacher."
Breen had a longtime interest in studying high-IQ youth, which included taking out advertisements in the early 1960s for a projected private school for gifted children which Breen hoped to launch in New York City, a project which came to nothing in the end.
Click to expand...
 
  • Horrifying
  • Islamic Content
Reactions: dumb idiot, UnsufficentBoobage, THEY STOLE MY FORESKIN and 5 others
AnOminous said:
This is more Google than Wikipedia, but look at this, if you look up prolific child molester Walter Breen, the husband of another child molester, Marion Zimmer Bradley, and they are now mostly known for their prolific child molestation of children including Bradley's own daughter,
Click to expand...
And including Bradley's son, who she also molested. That should not be overlooked.

Indeed, Walter Breen may have been more interested in boys, and, well, I'll just excerpt from what their daughter had to say:
The first time she molested me, I was three. The last time, I was twelve, and able to walk away.
Click to expand...
Walter was a serial rapist with many, many, many victims (I named 22 to the cops) but Marion was far, far worse. She was cruel and violent, as well as completely out of her mind sexually. I am not her only victim, nor were her only victims girls.
Click to expand...
Source.

To top it all off, although Bradley made big money off her books, her children were disinherited in her will and got nothing.
 
  • Informative
  • Horrifying
  • Feels
Reactions: Just A College Boy, Contra Pozz, UnsufficentBoobage and 8 others
en.wikipedia.org

Mister Splashy Pants - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org

archive.ph

Mister Splashy Pants - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

archived 25 Mar 2016 06:49:09 UTC
archive.ph archive.ph

A Humpback whale exists:

Wikipedia: Let's use a dumb logo created by reddit to represent it in our search links.
Screenshot_81.png
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: dumb idiot, Corpun, UnsufficentBoobage and 1 other person
Rome's rightful successor said:
en.wikipedia.org

Mister Splashy Pants - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org

archive.ph

Mister Splashy Pants - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

archived 25 Mar 2016 06:49:09 UTC
archive.ph archive.ph

A Humpback whale exists:

Wikipedia: Let's use a dumb logo created by reddit to represent it in our search links.
View attachment 2813963
A
Click to expand...
I was going to make a joke about how if TED talks make you notable the Sam Hyde article should have him at the TED talk... And it does.

I guess they're at least consistently retarded. Consistency counts for something, right?
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: dumb idiot, TheMagician, UnsufficentBoobage and 5 others
Here's a spergy argument among Wikipedia users because of Kirsten Stewart's ethnic background. On the Howard Stern show in 2019, Stewart found out that her mother was half Ashkenazi Jewish and adopted by a Jewish couple in California. Even though Kirsten Stewart herself stated this in an interview, Wikipedia users were against mentioning this in her page or using the interview as a "proper source". I guess the Howard Stern show doesn't fit their narrative? Never mind the countless times Wiki users will point out a notable person's ethnic background, even if it turns out to be a load of BS.

Archive:

Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard - Wikipedia

web.archive.org web.archive.org

A little preview of some of the "sound reasoning" on why Stewart's own words on her family should be omitted from her page.
Screencap.PNG
screencap 2.PNG
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: JJLiautaud, Shaka Brah, UnsufficentBoobage and 4 others
Lucille Bluth said:
Here's a spergy argument among Wikipedia users because of Kirsten Stewart's ethnic background. On the Howard Stern show in 2019, Stewart found out that her mother was half Ashkenazi Jewish and adopted by a Jewish couple in California. But, even though Kirsten Stewart herself stated this in an interview, Wikipedia users were against mentioning this in her page or using the interview as a "proper source". Because I guess the Howard Stern show does not fit their narrative? Never mind the countless times Wiki users will needlessly point out a notable person's ethnic background, even if it turns out to be a load of bull.

Archive:

Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard - Wikipedia

web.archive.org web.archive.org

A little preview of some of the "sound reasoning" on why Stewart's own words on her family should be omitted from her page.
View attachment 2817655
View attachment 2817656
Click to expand...
As someone with a thick eleven-inch dick, I understand the logic that a notable person's own words can be an unreliable source of information about themselves. But I don't understand the logic that prefixing the statement in question with something like "According to Stewart…" is unacceptable when there's no reason or evidence to imply Stewart is not being factual about that particular statement.

At any rate, if a RS like the NYT were to publish a mention of Stewart's heritage, what would be their source? Most likely Stewart herself. But those words being laundered through an NYT editor would make them sufficiently trustworthy for Wikipedia. Standard Wikipedia illogic.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Strange Looking Dog, Captain Hastings Official, Lowlife Adventures and 7 others
Least Concern said:
At any rate, if a RS like the NYT were to publish a mention of Stewart's heritage, what would be their source? Most likely Stewart herself. But those words being laundered through an NYT editor would make them sufficiently trustworthy for Wikipedia. Standard Wikipedia illogic.
Click to expand...
It's standard citogenesis, and it is not a side effect but entirely intentional that it favors people with connections with "reliable sources" who can then create fake credibility for their propaganda by incestuously citing each other over and over.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Strange Looking Dog, Captain Hastings Official, Shaka Brah and 6 others
Lucille Bluth said:
Here's a spergy argument among Wikipedia users because of Kirsten Stewart's ethnic background. On the Howard Stern show in 2019, Stewart found out that her mother was half Ashkenazi Jewish and adopted by a Jewish couple in California. Even though Kirsten Stewart herself stated this in an interview, Wikipedia users were against mentioning this in her page or using the interview as a "proper source". I guess the Howard Stern show doesn't fit their narrative? Never mind the countless times Wiki users will point out a notable person's ethnic background, even if it turns out to be a load of BS.

Archive:

Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard - Wikipedia

web.archive.org web.archive.org

A little preview of some of the "sound reasoning" on why Stewart's own words on her family should be omitted from her page.
View attachment 2817655
View attachment 2817656
Click to expand...
A small cadre of wikipedos don't like including someone's Jewishness on their page, because it "inspires antisemitism" to correctly report that someone is a Jew.
Josterman said:

Talk:Great Reset - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
the talk page of the great reset is filled with autism
Click to expand...
The fact they're adamant that the Great Reset either doesn't exist or isn't what people claim is pretty funny since Klaus Schwab wrote a book telling you exactly what it is. There are people in there claiming that interviews with Klaus Schwab, the man who invented the term, are not a valid source for what the term means.

A few people are asking why COVID-19: The Great Reset (one of his books) is mentioned but the contents never are.
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Just A College Boy, dumb idiot, Corpun and 6 others
Shaka Brah said:
A small cadre of wikipedos don't like including someone's Jewishness on their page, because it "inspires antisemitism" to correctly report that someone is a Jew.

The fact they're adamant that the Great Reset either doesn't exist or isn't what people claim is pretty funny since Klaus Schwab wrote a book telling you exactly what it is. There are people in there claiming that interviews with Klaus Schwab, the man who invented the term, are not a valid source for what the term means.

A few people are asking why COVID-19: The Great Reset (one of his books) is mentioned but the contents never are.
Click to expand...
Yeah it’s always a cover up
 
Shaka Brah said:
A small cadre of wikipedos don't like including someone's Jewishness on their page, because it "inspires antisemitism" to correctly report that someone is a Jew.
Click to expand...
What's weird is most of those Jew lists and "Early Life and Experience" sections were insisted on by Jews in the first place. There was even a relatively organized group who were going around putting those in when they started appearing.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: Raging Capybara, Corpun, From The Uncanny Valley and 7 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back