Dumb Shit on Wikipedia

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Jesus Lord have mercy I am literally speechles.

Edit: I have something: View attachment 3330117
Lol fat.

To I'm sure no one's surprise, troon. However, unusually, he claimed to be gay as a male (but is somehow now "queer"), instead of the usual transbian. He self-IDs as "a disabled queer trans leftist Jewish woman" and also depressed. The disability could be depression, plurality, or something else.

Name: Thomas Harrison Kelly
Troon name: Tamzin Hadasa Kelly
Born: April 14, 1996
Ethnicity: half-Jewish, quarter-Irish

Source: old wiki page.
Source: older wiki page.
Reddit post choosing name.
 
To I'm sure no one's surprise, troon. However, unusually, he claimed to be gay as a male (but is somehow now "queer"), instead of the usual transbian. He self-IDs as "a disabled queer trans leftist Jewish woman" and also depressed. The disability could be depression, plurality, or something else.

Name: Thomas Harrison Kelly
Troon name: Tamzin Hadasa Kelly
Born: April 14, 1996
Ethnicity: half-Jewish, quarter-Irish

Source: old wiki page.
Source: older wiki page.
Reddit post choosing name.
Damn the kiwi investigators are quick
 
To I'm sure no one's surprise, troon. However, unusually, he claimed to be gay as a male (but is somehow now "queer"), instead of the usual transbian. He self-IDs as "a disabled queer trans leftist Jewish woman" and also depressed. The disability could be depression, plurality, or something else.

Name: Thomas Harrison Kelly
Troon name: Tamzin Hadasa Kelly
Born: April 14, 1996
Ethnicity: half-Jewish, quarter-Irish

Source: old wiki page.
Source: older wiki page.
Reddit post choosing name.
Wait which member of the plural system has depression??? omg..
 
You'd think nobody would target a cheap Disney direct-to-video prequel, but some jackass has vandalized the page for The Little Mermaid: Ariel's Beginning. Seriously, half the page is just a copypasta from that of The Emoji Movie, while other portions (such as the retarded imaginary Rotten Tomatoes consensus) seem to have been invented from whole cloth.

Some guy on the article's talk page even admits that it was deliberately vandalized as a prank.
Metacritic (which uses a weighted average) assigned The Emoji Movie a score of 0 out of 100 based on 26 critics, indicating "unfair protest", becoming the lowest-rated animated film on the site.[6][7] Audiences polled by CinemaScore gave the film an average grade of "B" on an A+ to F scale.[8]
They didn't even bother changing this line.......
 
Yeah the whole stricter gun control measures is preferred by 53% of Americans is not a vast majority and that more or less collapses when surveys ask about specific policy proposals its pure agitprop plain and simple.
The politifact article they cite goes onto cite polls showing that 84% and 90% of Americans support universal background checks. I don't know where you got 53% from.


I'd be highly suspicious of anything Politifact says.
View attachment 3325505

I'm not sure what the contradiction in this image is. Amazon didn't pay federal income taxes in 2017, but it's false to say that they paid "no tax" or that they have a monopoly. You know federal income taxes aren't the only tax, right?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Peezus
I've long enjoyed messing with Wikipedia, although it's maybe a decade since I did anything.

My favourite move was going to the mathematics article called ACCURACY AND PRECISION, around 2006 I think?

I moved all the decimal points about, either left or right one character. It took 3 months to be changed back. Conversely, changing the wiki page for James Blunt at the same time to say he was a cunt got reverted in 5 minutes flat.

Having seen James Blunt in interviews and on Twitter since, I do realise that no matter how bad his music is he isn't a cunt. But 3 months of an article called "Accuracy and Precision" being wrong tickled me a lot.

I sort of knew that wiki was starting to get too political not that long after. I have saved on my hard drive a complete mirror of all article texts from 2011...I was frequently offline and liked reading random wiki articles so it was fun to have on my crappy netbook while travelling back then.

Might be interesting to compare some stuff from then and now. I'm sure they've retroactively changed the records for some articles, Stalin style.
 
I've long enjoyed messing with Wikipedia, although it's maybe a decade since I did anything.

My favourite move was going to the mathematics article called ACCURACY AND PRECISION, around 2006 I think?

I moved all the decimal points about, either left or right one character. It took 3 months to be changed back. Conversely, changing the wiki page for James Blunt at the same time to say he was a cunt got reverted in 5 minutes flat.

Having seen James Blunt in interviews and on Twitter since, I do realise that no matter how bad his music is he isn't a cunt. But 3 months of an article called "Accuracy and Precision" being wrong tickled me a lot.

I sort of knew that wiki was starting to get too political not that long after. I have saved on my hard drive a complete mirror of all article texts from 2011...I was frequently offline and liked reading random wiki articles so it was fun to have on my crappy netbook while travelling back then.

Might be interesting to compare some stuff from then and now. I'm sure they've retroactively changed the records for some articles, Stalin style.
Godspeed, the autists deserve it. My favorite kind of vandalism is to change the original Arabic (or similar obscure language) names of smaller towns or people. Takes ages to get discovered, even when the autists are on guard due to frequent vandalism.
 
"Just keep in mind, the wikipedia article you're reading is most likely written by a gay, furry, transexual communist"
They should be legally forced to show you a splash screen of the fat autistic retard who wrote the article you're reading, sort of like the wrecked lungs some countries force tobacco sellers to put on the sides of cigarette packs.
 
Well that explains why Tamzin was so sympathetic to RemusSandersRegretsEverything (who I posted a while back on this thread).

Meanwhile, the Administrators' Noticeboard for incidents has had someone file a report over someone drafting an article about Chris Chan. ( Diff | Archive )
1654112459576.png

ETA: The culprit is suspected to be that darn dirty transphobe KiwiFarms. ( Diff | Archive )
1654117691010.png
 
Last edited:
Wikipedia is really just there to make people with useless degrees feel useful.
Or people without even high school diplomas. After all, a literal pants-shitting retard in a basement full of piss bottles is more qualified at any subject, according to Wikipedia logic, than someone who won the Nobel Prize for inventing a world-changing invention in the subject. Of course, that guy doesn't have the time for Wikipedia, so the pants-shitting speds took over.
 
I mean there's not a lot of thesis statements for peer-reviewed college papers that can be wholly copied from things said by homophobic teens in the 90s :

"Ever notice how He-man wears pink and has long hair, what a fag! I bet he has SEX with Skeletor in the butt hahahaha!"

Queer is by definition "weird", yet 90% of the population didn't see anything weird or deviant about He-man because they had no concept of gay culture and thus he was something for young (straight) boys to aspire to. A big tough dude that fought monsters and protected his (nuclear) family and friends. A child-friendly version of Conan the Barbarian that young boys had been reading about for decades prior. It was only when gay culture entered the mainstream public consciousness in the 90s that dudes starting drawing parallels. Partially as an offhanded joke, partially out of insecurity. But there are broken manchildren at the highest levels of academia that are basing their entire identity and field of study off of the fact that bullies mocked their He-man lunchbox 30 years ago because TMNT was now cooler
 
Last edited:
Back