- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Dude is a retard, NFPA 704 is for fire hazards.Someone repeatedly changed the 1 for Health to a 3, these are their edit summaries:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dude is a retard, NFPA 704 is for fire hazards.Someone repeatedly changed the 1 for Health to a 3, these are their edit summaries:
I love the other guy's response: the first responders are unlikely to drink the methanolDude is a retard, NFPA 704 is for fire hazards.
There's also the entire Scots English Wikipedia that was edited by one American teen, who didn't speak the dialect and just wrote articles with a Scottish-looking accent.You have to cover wikitionary deleting an entire language arbitarily, even after the community voted that this admin's personal theory was retarded, i covered a little bit of a while back.
“This is going to sound incredibly hyperbolic and hysterical,” noted Ultach, “but I think this person has possibly done more damage to the Scots language than anyone else in history. They engaged in cultural vandalism on a hitherto unprecedented scale."
Which is exactly what Scots "language" is.There's also the entire Scots English Wikipedia that was edited by one American teen, who didn't speak the dialect and just wrote articles with a Scottish-looking accent.
It's as different from English as Norwegian and Swedish from Danish.Which is exactly what Scots "language" is.
As it stands the current Scots English Wikipedia is still entirely fucking stupid and straight up patronizing to assume that Scots can only read shitty articles that attempt to be similar to their silly accents.There's also the entire Scots English Wikipedia that was edited by one American teen, who didn't speak the dialect and just wrote articles with a Scottish-looking accent.
![]()
Um, almost the entire Scots Wikipedia was written by someone with no idea of the language – 10,000s of articles
None of you trained an AI on this data set, right? Right?www.theregister.com
It has everything. Arrogant wikipedos, topic-squatting, ignorance, the works.
It would be laughable, kid not for the fact that Scots wiki is used as the training data for several translation resources.
Yes and yes. The rules say that, with few exceptions, if a source is not vetted in a way that the wikipedos think is appropriate, it can't be used. Very few journalists want to touch the Tranch now that the story is about an alpaca death camp instead of an inspiring tranny cult, so its ghost will live on on Wikipedia until someone who's not on the outs with the mainstream like the Blocked & Reported guys are writes a "So what happened to the Tranch?" article when the subject gets less radioactive, which should be around 2030.I posted about some recent Wikipedia nonsense in regards to the Tranch here:
https://kiwifarms.net/threads/the-t...gue-phillip-matthew-logue.86681/post-15369776
I wanted to ask someone more familiar with how Wikipedia works...
The Tranch is dead, and even the Tranchers have admitted (on the official Tranch twitter account) that they've been evicted. They've also shut down their website and privated or deleted most of their social media accounts. Is it normal for Wikipedia to ignore all this and refuse to allow updates since a "reliable" journalist hasn't written about it? It seems so weird to me that Wiki is just going to pretend like the Tranch is still up and running. How absurd would it be if the article remains unchanged like 10+ years in the future?
Does this happen for other organizations or communes that close down without any media fanfare?
It's still riddled with the "english with an accent" articles written by that one idiot (who was also a brony). Possibly because the other admins are roosting on it like fat pigeons and shitting on anyone who tries to change it.As it stands the current Scots English Wikipedia is still entirely fucking stupid and straight up patronizing to assume that Scots can only read shitty articles that attempt to be similar to their silly accents.
How is it deceptively written? The Iroquois Confederacy still exists because it's the tribal government recognized by the US and Canada like most other Indian tribes, even though all they do now is mostly just block roads to get more gibs or aid US-Canada border drug traffickers for bribes.Check out the Iroquios Confederacy for another article that is deceptively written to give the subject false life.
The constituent tribes exist but there is no formal entity which governs all Iroquois or which is the successor of the Confederacy rather than the tribes, since the Confederacy just dissolved after its territory was flooded with white settlers.How is it deceptively written? The Iroquois Confederacy still exists because it's the tribal government recognized by the US and Canada like most other Indian tribes, even though all they do now is mostly just block roads to get more gibs or aid US-Canada border drug traffickers for bribes.
Although the article is funny that they go to great lengths trying to minimize the historic practice of slavery among the Iroquois but then detail the also historic part about how they'd ritually torture captives, including slaves.
Them using Vox as a reliable source has always pissed me off because they constantly say you can't use conservative sites as sources yet using heavily liberal ones like Vox. It's just so easy to tell how openly boas they are.Anything that touches upon Trump on Wikipedia is going to be completely irrational as they are able to use glorified op eds as sources. Take for example their so-called sourcing for the claim that trumpism is fascism - it's a bunch of opinion articles from places like vox.
The coverage on Trump on Wikipedia is so bad, among the worst of any contemporary political figure, that it really seems to cross the line into defamation.
There is no site-wide consistency about accepting sources. A tweet from an organization's official account would be accepted and unremarkable on many articles, especially about something as simple as closing down. See WPI posted about some recent Wikipedia nonsense in regards to the Tranch here:
https://kiwifarms.net/threads/the-tenacious-unicorhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research#Primaryn-ranch-tenaciousranch-steampunk-penny-penellope-logue-phillip-matthew-logue.86681/post-15369776
I wanted to ask someone more familiar with how Wikipedia works...
The Tranch is dead, and even the Tranchers have admitted (on the official Tranch twitter account) that they've been evicted. They've also shut down their website and privated or deleted most of their social media accounts. Is it normal for Wikipedia to ignore all this and refuse to allow updates since a "reliable" journalist hasn't written about it? It seems so weird to me that Wiki is just going to pretend like the Tranch is still up and running. How absurd would it be if the article remains unchanged like 10+ years in the future?
Does this happen for other organizations or communes that close down without any media fanfare?
Meh thats the now standard comparison text on wikipedia now that the Lord's Prayer has been replaced as being offensive.Thanks to the English Wikipedia for showing what the English language looks like. This short sample text really enlightened me about the language.
View attachment 4737508
![]()
English language - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
I know right the lords prayer while not perfect as a comparison text is certainly a better text than the opening to the UN Declaration of Human Rights, if the religious overtones bother you use the horse and sheep fable. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schleicher's_fable>replaced the Lord's Prayer
>with the fucking UN opening lines
I really fucking hate the Antichrist holy shit