Dumb Shit on Wikipedia

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Nigger-on-nigger-(but-bleached) violence, woo!
Screenshot_2025-06-28-21-30-21-006_com.brave.browser-edit.webp

"Rule violations"
Screenshot_2025-06-28-21-31-29-564_com.brave.browser-edit.webp
 
  • Lunacy
  • Like
  • DRINK!
Reactions: graywolf88, Flaming Insignias, Sicko Hunter and 14 others
malachite said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Bhanu_Srivastav_(2nd_nomination)
View attachment 7572478>Stop using AI, use your own words. Chronos.Zx (talk) 00:18, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
View attachment 7572481
<arre bhai, the AI callout stings but I get why you'd think that.i just woke up few minutes back,trying this again at 8:24 AM Bangalore time (running on 3 hours sleep, words might come out sideways) the truth is? I m struggling to keep this because,Times of India piece about me leaving banking for AI?Real. Financial Express writing about my work? was Real Outlook tracking where donations went? was also Real as this headache.Earlier draft probably sounded robotic because i was overthinking everyword this time just raw typing no backspaces no thesaurus. Please don't trash verified history just because I phrase things awkwardly. The facts stand even when my English is not good. still my head is spinning after waking up n seeing AI comment. Surya7t (talk)
Click to expand...
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Rapesputin
Brain Power said:
Panda porn.
Why does it bring pandemic? It's not even similar sounding like the second result it brings out.
View attachment 7574673
Click to expand...
A lot of search results nowadays seem to be built around "fuzzy spelling" - basically show you the results of what you're searching for and any results that are close in case you had a misspelling. There's probably a bunch of people that spelled "pandamic."

Which can be extremely frustrating at times when you spelled something correctly (like a name in a fictional book) and it keeps wanting to show you results of what it thinks you're looking for.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Toolbox, Pedophobe, Dendyy and 15 others
Flexo said:
A lot of search results nowadays seem to be built around "fuzzy spelling" - basically show you the results of what you're searching for and any results that are close in case you had a misspelling. There's probably a bunch of people that spelled "pandamic."

Which can be extremely frustrating at times when you spelled something correctly (like a name in a fictional book) and it keeps wanting to show you results of what it thinks you're looking for.
Click to expand...
It's still weird on what wording brings it. Writing "panfe" or "panxe" also brings pandemic (and pansexual) but "panse" brings out every article they have on pansexuals (and no pandemic). "Pance" shows a page about recession due to the coof shitshow (but not pandemic). And "panze" just gives you a lot of german tanks.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Da Capo, Shiny Shroodle, scathefire and 7 others
Vriljami said:
It has been previously stated Indians are a constant nuisance in Wikipedia and shameless ESL self-promoters. Seems spot on. Apparently the jeet even made a separate article for his book: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deified:_The_Legacy_of_Yesterday
Click to expand...
The reason why pages relating to Indian people don't display their name in any Indic script is because Indians would have temper tantrums about what scripts should be included. This rule doesn't apply to neighboring countries or even Russia (similar linguistic situation over there, one main language (Russian) with tons of other ethnic languages with slightly different ways of writing a name)
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Wright, BinaricHate, Pedophobe and 12 others
Gemerson said:
The reason why pages relating to Indian people don't display their name in any Indic script is because Indians would have temper tantrums about what scripts should be included. This rule doesn't apply to neighboring countries or even Russia (similar linguistic situation over there, one main language (Russian) with tons of other ethnic languages with slightly different ways of writing a name)
Click to expand...

2,534 rejected articles consisting of Indians shamelessly shilling themselves in engrish. What is it in the Indian national psyche that compels them to scam and shill relentlessly in the Internet.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Horrifying
Reactions: Wright, Pedophobe, Hoplixe and 9 others
lolcow yoghurt said:
There's no way this is a real Wikipedia article. This is full-on propaganda. If someone doubts Wikipedia is a trannypedo propaganda, show them this whole article.

View attachment 7569979View attachment 7569980View attachment 7569981View attachment 7569982View attachment 7569984
Click to expand...
All sperging about dog whistles being a legitimate thing or not (it seems to me that the people who shouldn't be able to hear the whistle all seem to recognize it), this is absolutely not a dog whistle, because the people using it are directly sending everyone a message. Everyone knows what it means.
 
  • Winner
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Wright, Hoplixe, Flaming Insignias and 8 others
UnsufficentBoobage said:
Click to expand...
>hit ctrl+f
>type "furry"
>0 results
Another unbiased classic from the great wiki editors (who never ever ever omit relevant info because it would embarrass groups they like).
Sticker Nigger said:
This is what's featured on the main page of Wikipedia's offshoot dictionary website. I just wanted to know if my words are misspelled *sigh*
View attachment 7570609
Click to expand...
Wiktionary deserves its own thread
wiktionary autism.webp
 
Last edited:
  • Lunacy
  • Horrifying
  • Like
Reactions: Wright, 2SLGBQTIA+ 2 Furious, Chromeo and 12 others
From The Uncanny Valley said:
Seriously? This was the best image they could find?
Click to expand...
1751271240027.webp


Picture that doesn't even show the face of the subject. A lot of times Wikipedia scrapes by when it comes to pictures since everything is copyrighted these days, so they use what they can. It's not that better pics don't exist: But if a Wikipedia user can conjure up an image themselves for an article, in 99% its the one used since it doesn't involve copyright hurdles.

Odd to defend Wikipedia, but fuck copyright.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Wright, Toolbox, Pedophobe and 24 others
lolcow yoghurt said:
There's no way this is a real Wikipedia article. This is full-on propaganda. If someone doubts Wikipedia is a trannypedo propaganda, show them this whole article.

View attachment 7569979View attachment 7569980View attachment 7569981View attachment 7569982View attachment 7569984
Click to expand...
This is a prime example of an idea being so illogical and unreasonable, that you need to twist regular language to somehow justify it. You need to believe that you can just change (Wiithin human ability!) a natural law, which is nonsense, to even take this side's argument at face value.

I blame Kant's philosophy and all that came from it for things like this; People believe they can do whatever they want because they're supposedly the only sentient beings, and need to realise all of their ideas. This is the cost of removing morality.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Dumb
Reactions: Wright, Flaming Insignias, Gemerson and 6 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back