Dumb Shit on Wikipedia

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
So Wikipedia has a trany genocide page but doesn't have a page about the Zanzibar Genocide, an event that actually happened.

Lol if you saw the reddit comments on a post about a Muslim soccer player from Africa refusing to wear a rainbow coloured LGBT jersey you might think that you were on Stormfront or something, it's fucking nuts how much racism the wokies suppress lmao
 
Decided to check the Wikipedia page for Doug Mastriano, GOP nominee for the gubnatorial election in PA. Honestly amazed they're allowed to get away with this. Must be afraid he will win or something after Tom Wolf's years of fuckups and ineptitude.
It's fucking locked too.
Wikipedos hate doug.png
 
View attachment 3506722

lol pretty much an outright admission of grooming being the main way of 'reproducing'.
Why is this specifically referencing Jewish activists? Sounds like /pol/ is trying to sneak shit into far-left Wikipedia articles.
So Wikipedia has a trany genocide page but doesn't have a page about the Zanzibar Genocide, an event that actually happened.
The massacres are covered in the page on the Zanzibar Revolution but curiously the page on the Afro-Shirazi Party, the far-left political party behind said massacres, makes no reference to it. This would be like the page on the NSDAP not mentioning the Holocaust.

Here's a related article (archive) on one of the political leaders, featuring this curious paragraph.

In early 1964, massive riots broke out, and the Umma Party played a key role, notable for having "prevented the revolution from taking a racial character i.e. African against Arab".[6] Which played a political face-saving measure for the Nyerere government which was horrified with the scenes of mass killings and open-pit mass graves. The principle provocateur of the revolution; the African Nationalist John Okello had specifically demanded the killing of all Arabs between the ages of 18 and 25. The Revolution led to the deaths of up to 20,000 mainly Arabs with widespread rape and some settlements completely wiped out. Following the state capture of Zanzibar, racially motivated violence and persecution continued, forcing up to 75% of Arabs, Asians and Comoros Islanders to leave their centuries-old ancestral home.

I think it's trying to say that not everyone involved in the Revolution was black African but it phrases it in an incredibly poor manner. The article is clearly written by an admirer.
 
Decided to check the Wikipedia page for Doug Mastriano, GOP nominee for the gubnatorial election in PA. Honestly amazed they're allowed to get away with this. Must be afraid he will win or something after Tom Wolf's years of fuckups and ineptitude.
It's fucking locked too.
View attachment 3508289

I don't understand the definition of 'far right' anymore. It used to mean racialists and neo-nazis, now it seems to be 'very conservative' but otherwise normie Republican activist types like the people who work for Breitbart.

And clicking on the link to 'far right' leads me to 'Radical Right (United States)'. Part of it is as you'd expect - the Klan, 19th century nativist groups, but then it devolves into naming a bunch of unrelated groups like John Birch Society members, extremist libertarians, and even some neocon-aligned groups like the counter-jihad writers of the 00s. Not surprisingly, multiple uses of the contemptible Hofstadter throughout.
 
I don't understand the definition of 'far right' anymore. It used to mean racialists and neo-nazis, now it seems to be 'very conservative' but otherwise normie Republican activist types like the people who work for Breitbart.

And clicking on the link to 'far right' leads me to 'Radical Right (United States)'. Part of it is as you'd expect - the Klan, 19th century nativist groups, but then it devolves into naming a bunch of unrelated groups like John Birch Society members, extremist libertarians, and even some neocon-aligned groups like the counter-jihad writers of the 00s. Not surprisingly, multiple uses of the contemptible Hofstadter throughout.
Far right is basically slander now. Basically anyone who opposes current thing (gay, troons, abortion, etc.) Is a far right neo-whatever racist Nazi. Most of Wikipedos far right claims come from hack journos calling people far right.

You are probably far right as far as these people are considered and you may have never said the N word in your life.
 

Looks like something that’ll end up in the usual stratospheric Wiki autismo.

Someone will claim that a “reputable source” has made the claim (NYT?) and everyone who points out that there IS no tranny genocide will be handwaved away with idiotic wiki-arguments like “Hurr-durr-NO ORIGINAL RESEARCH!”

Whoever is the most autistic and has the most time to waste will win the argument as everyone sane will eventually just shrug and find something better to do with their time.

And the tranny genocide article will be added to the trash pile of nonsensical bullshit that has been increasingly piling up on Wikipedia.
 
This was sort of discussed in the Taylor Lorenz thread, but the article for 'Libs of TikTok' barely even pretends to cover what the account's actual content is. I don't really follow it so I am no expert on it.


Screenshot_20220720_171232.png


This single section, perhaps about 15% of the article and strangely positioned about half way down the page, is all the precious coverage of content we get. No discussion about why it grew in popularity (cringe comedy from TikTok users own videos). Much of the rest of the article is sourced from Lorenz original dox article (which the newfags at Wiki refer to as 'doxxing') and the snowballing 'reporting' by later journowhores who reported on her reporting rather than produce original content.

This is really common on Wikipedia now, it was written as a barely concealed attack op-ed 'article'.
 
I was reading the history regarding the computation of Pi, when one entry stuck out to me:
pi.png

Why exactly is this here? The rest of the article is fairly straightforward, either showcasing advances in the number of calculated digits, or the amount of time it took for said digits to be calculated. This entry is neither, and surely can't be the only time a state or government tried to legally declare as Pi as a particular series of digits. Also, why is the digit red? It's not a link to another article. Is someone trying to make a "lol stoopid conservatard gubbamint" argument in a an article about Pi of all things?

Also, how the hell has KF lasted for very nearly a decade, and not a single person has ever mentioned Emma Haruka Iwao, the current record holder? I remember google shilled this bitch hard with a customary doodle, even though the science had been around for a very long time and we wouldn't be anywhere near where we are now without the work of Yasumasa Kanada, who oversaw the number of digits calculated rise from 2 million digits to 1.2 billion digits during his 20 year long career in the field, and when he died, Timothy Mullican held the record at 50 trillion digits. A record he'd hold for over 18 months, and yet he doesn't even get an article, neither does Peter Trueb, Sandon Nash Van Ness or Shigeru Kondo, the other contemporary record holders from the previous decade.
iwao.png


If this is a woman, then I'm Bill Clinton.
iwao photo.jpg

Edit: And now, without the flattering angle
:
iwao photo new.jpg
But remember, just a fringe minority™ :biggrin:
 
Last edited:
lol! At the bottom of the page;
lol65112.pngScreenshot2727121.png

These types of useless images annoy me, what encyclopedic value or gain (if any at all) is there for including some random retard holding up a some paper saying 'STOP TRANNY GENOCIDE'? If I play along with that article's narrative of a true and honest trans genocide occurring in places like Brazil for example you would think they would include mortality rates showing how trans people have higher mortality rates and lower life expectancy then the average folk which would at-least be relevant to the article's current content but nope! I guess the argument would be "WOW A IMAGE = MORE CONTENT" but in this circumstance adds literally nothing or very little at best when something can be inferred briefly from the text of the article anyway. (maybe I am just autistic here)
 
lol! At the bottom of the page;
View attachment 3512750View attachment 3512755

These types of useless images annoy me, what encyclopedic value or gain (if any at all) is there for including some random retard holding up a some paper saying 'STOP TRANNY GENOCIDE'? If I play along with that article's narrative of a true and honest trans genocide occurring in places like Brazil for example you would think they would include mortality rates showing how trans people have higher mortality rates and lower life expectancy then the average folk which would at-least be relevant to the article's current content but nope! I guess the argument would be "WOW A IMAGE = MORE CONTENT" but in this circumstance adds literally nothing or very little at best when something can be inferred briefly from the text of the article anyway. (maybe I am just autistic here)
This drives me up the wall as well, especially on science articles when the image is some historical figure who farted in the topic's general direction once. It's enough to say that Newton did a lot of work on this, dude, the portrait really doesn't add anything. It seems to be something specific to the English Wikipedia since I've never seen it in the other language versions (or at least it's not this bad).
 
Lol if you saw the reddit comments on a post about a Muslim soccer player from Africa refusing to wear a rainbow coloured LGBT jersey you might think that you were on Stormfront or something, it's fucking nuts how much racism the wokies suppress lmao
They don't even really suppress it. The instant any pee-oh-see disagrees with their dogma, the very next thing out of their mouths, as if you'd whacked their patella with a mallet, is some equivalent of "SILENCE, nigger!"
Why exactly is this here? The rest of the article is fairly straightforward, either showcasing advances in the number of calculated digits, or the amount of time it took for said digits to be calculated.
It's completely irrelevant to the topic of the article, but the days Wikipedia was actually encyclopedic instead of just being a shitbox for "Rational" Wikitards are long over. Also the whole idea of "records" for numbers of pi are pretty dumb anyway. Great, so you ran one of the many known algorithms for calculating pi on a really fast computer and amazingly got more digits than the last guy by running it until you had a new "record."

Any jackass with some Big Iron can do that.

The only real advance would be if someone found a new computational shortcut for it.
 
They don't even really suppress it. The instant any pee-oh-see disagrees with their dogma, the very next thing out of their mouths, as if you'd whacked their patella with a mallet, is some equivalent of "SILENCE, nigger!"

It's completely irrelevant to the topic of the article, but the days Wikipedia was actually encyclopedic instead of just being a shitbox for "Rational" Wikitards are long over. Also the whole idea of "records" for numbers of pi are pretty dumb anyway. Great, so you ran one of the many known algorithms for calculating pi on a really fast computer and amazingly got more digits than the last guy by running it until you had a new "record."

Any jackass with some Big Iron can do that.

The only real advance would be if someone found a new computational shortcut for it.
It's so obvious that's the way it's been ever since Alexander Yee's Y-Cruncher came out, with Kondo the first person to use it. No-one has innovated beyond that point. Perhaps the most obvious is Van Ness (who actually died back in 2015), who was really just a rich Linux autist with a lot of time on his hands. Anyone can achieve the record if they have a few thousand dollars to throw down the drain, a power supply that can take the strain, no power cuts, and 3 - 4 months of their time to throw away.
pi.png

Iwao is a fucking troon hack in comparison.
 
It's so obvious that's the way it's been ever since Alexander Yee's Y-Cruncher came out, with Kondo the first person to use it. No-one has innovated beyond that point. Perhaps the most obvious is Van Ness (who actually died back in 2015), who was really just a rich Linux autist with a lot of time on his hands. Anyone can achieve the record if they have a few thousand dollars to throw down the drain, a power supply that can take the strain, no power cuts, and 3 - 4 months of their time to throw away.
View attachment 3513612
Iwao is a fucking troon hack in comparison.
Or if you prove that pi is normal or even more surprisingly that pi isnt normal which is the only way calculation pi to e40+ digits actualy matters
 
From the funny pictures thread:
View attachment 3513335
Based if true. And probably why theres been so much tranny subversion of nerd communities why? I don't know.
Autogynephiliacs are usually heavily autistic. Not always the useful kind, but more the kind who will do a 48-hour vigil reverting changes to a gaming wiki because they believe some BS about a character. I don't know what it is, but their is a troon critical mass where you'll reach a point of no return if you let them inhabit some place.
When I first went to college their was a gaming club that I used to do homework in and during my last few months before transferring to a better school there was a big fat, troon with blue hair who started coming in. Didn't shower and had dandruff in it's hair, they were very abrasive, but they brought in a game console for people to use. I generally stopped going in and started using the abandoned Veteran Society Room because I made proper friends with a guy in one of my classes. Eventually from across the hall I noticed that a furry joined the group along with the troon and then another troon. I think generally more nerdy people just don't want to confrontational about shit, so they'll let a safe space sticker go up or let a tranny become a club officer because to them the club is just a place to hang out and before long the club actually has rules beyond don;t be a fucking cunt.

My guess for Wikipedia is because then they can be easily correct the record and be 'right'. What's funny is that the actual Asperger motherfuckers I knew in college fucking hated the trannies and outed them as autists.
 
Decided to check the Wikipedia page for Doug Mastriano, GOP nominee for the gubnatorial election in PA. Honestly amazed they're allowed to get away with this. Must be afraid he will win or something after Tom Wolf's years of fuckups and ineptitude.
It's fucking locked too.
View attachment 3508289
Reading the NYT's article they have citied as "proof" he is far-right is baffling. The reasons they have for labeling him far-right are:
  1. He questioned the 2020 election integrity
  2. Is against masks and vaccines
  3. Q-anon
So I guess you don't have to actually have any far-right beliefs to be labelled as one now? They've painted a typical conspiratard boomer you could find in any midwestern town as a dangerous neo-Nazi. How is this not considered libelous?
 
Reading the NYT's article they have citied as "proof" he is far-right is baffling. The reasons they have for labeling him far-right are:
  1. He questioned the 2020 election integrity
  2. Is against masks and vaccines
  3. Q-anon
So I guess you don't have to actually have any far-right beliefs to be labelled as one now? They've painted a typical conspiratard boomer you could find in any midwestern town as a dangerous neo-Nazi. How is this not considered libelous?
Because opinion is protected speech? I hate it but I dont see an alternative.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Sparkling Yuzu
Because opinion is protected speech? I hate it but I dont see an alternative.
Opinion is saying you oppose somebody politically. Falsely claiming someone is a goose-stepping Nazi in a way that millions will see your lies can ruin people's livelihood and the defamed should be able to sue for damages. NYT v Sullivan is a horrible precedent and should've been overturned alongside Roe and the Sullivan Act.
 
Back