Dumb Shit on Wikipedia

[AnOminous]

I'd love to see a journalist run an article on shit like this.

I wouldn't. The only thing I'd like to see that involves a journalist is a journalist shoved up against a wall and shot.

 

[Jonah Hill poster]

I think I just found an example of Ye Derangement Syndrome on Kanye West‘s Wikipedia page:

Kanye West - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

You know I never thought that we‘d get to a point where a guy like Ye saying “I love both Jewish people and the Nazis. I love everyone.” would still get you “identified as a Nazi”, yet here we are.

Hanging out with the Catboy aside, this just reeks of kicking a man down while pretending to care about mental health awareness.

 

[WhiteNight]

You know I never thought that we‘d get to a point where a guy like Ye saying “I love both Jewish people and the Nazis. I love everyone.” would still get you “identified as a Nazi”, yet here we are.

They give two sources for this in the article, neither of which say he identified as a Nazi. Two additional sources were given on the talk page, but only one of them actually says anything close, The Times of Israel:

This is untrue; nowhere in the interview did he in fact call himself a Nazi. But Wikipedia now has its "reliable source" to put this easily refutable claim in the intro to the article. This is what they do to anyone they don't like.

 

[JJLiautaud]

.

Very based of the Wikiquote editors to quote the guy who wrote 200 Years Together. Very Based

 

[WhiteNight]

And there it is, Wikipedia added a school shooting to the Farms article. They're pretty obviously trying to imply to readers that we're to blame:

Kiwi Farms - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Did the shooter have a Facebook account also? Did he post creepy stuff there? Did people on Facebook talk about the shooting? I don't know, because Wikipedia's doesn't think such details are worth mentioning in their article on Facebook (because they're not).

Incidentally, are these assertions even true? The article cites garbage sources such as the SPLC for their claims, and the article on the shooting itself is full of nonsense such as calling the Farms alt-right.

 

[AnOminous]

Did the shooter have a Facebook account also? Did he post creepy stuff there? Did people on Facebook talk about the shooting? I don't know, because Wikipedia's doesn't think such details are worth mentioning in their article on Facebook (because they're not).

ED was where he did most of his "work," which mainly consisted of years of obsessively maintaining the school shooter "high score" list, which is partly why he was mocked as the Couch Cuck for his pitifully low score.

 

[Maldavius Figtree]

Re

And there it is, Wikipedia added a school shooting to the Farms article. They're pretty obviously trying to imply to readers that we're to blame:
View attachment 4055928

Kiwi Farms - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Did the shooter have a Facebook account also? Did he post creepy stuff there? Did people on Facebook talk about the shooting? I don't know, because Wikipedia's doesn't think such details are worth mentioning in their article on Facebook (because they're not).

Incidentally, are these assertions even true? The article cites garbage sources such as the SPLC for their claims, and the article on the shooting itself is full of nonsense such as calling the Farms alt-right

Reading the article on the shooting the would be killers met on tumblr, radicalised themselves there and posted their plans there. Fuck me I hate Wikipedia

 

[Lucille Bluth]

The Wiki page for "Indigenous peoples" seems to cause a lot of debate. It essentially states that the term "Indigenous" is arbitrary and often boils down to recognizing any ethnic group that is often marginalized and a distinct minority in a country or region.

What I do find interesting though is that ethnic Palestinians have a conflicting status on whether on not they're "Indigenous" to the Levant according to "reliable sources". The argument for why their "Indigenous" identity seems to be denied is because (((they))) argue that Jews have origins to Western Asia/the Levant due to Judasim's roots there. Meanwhile, the section on Europe doesn't recognize the vast majority of ethnic groups native to Europe as "Indigenous" because "reliable sources" like the United Nations do not consider most ethnic Europeans to be "Indigenous" to Europe. That seems to be saved for the Sami because of their reported marginalized history in Scandinavia and a few other ethnic groups.

Meanwhile, in Asia, the Kurds and Assyrians and the ethnic Greeks in Turkey's Asia Minor, as well several peoples in the Indian subcontinent seem to be recognized as being "Indigenous" to their respective areas without much issues. And they all seem to have a common struggle of either being genocided/targeted in historical conflicts. Or are, in present day, minorities that don't have as much recognition as majority ethnic groups in the areas.

They give two sources for this in the article, neither of which say he identified as a Nazi. Two additional sources were given on the talk page, but only one of them actually says anything close, The Times of Israel:
View attachment 4029705
This is untrue; nowhere in the interview did he in fact call himself a Nazi. But Wikipedia now has its "reliable source" to put this easily refutable claim in the intro to the article. This is what they do to anyone they don't like.

Yeah, so many claims of notable people get rejected and removed by Wiki editors because it is deemed "Gossip" or does not hold any "Due weight" or it's centred on "Circular reporting" or "Original Research". The latter two of which, I believe claims of Kayne stating that he is a " Nazi" would fall under.

Even JK Rowling, who wrote a whole essay on the term "TERF" has a sentence in her page stating that she rejects the 'TERF" label. Must be a lot of Harry Potter stans there vs hip-hop/Kardashian fans.

 

[Ewan McGregor]

The Wiki page for "Indigenous peoples" seems to cause a lot of debate. It essentially states that the term "Indigenous" is arbitrary and often boils down to recognizing any ethnic group that is often marginalized and a distinct minority in a country or region.

What I do find interesting though is that ethnic Palestinians have a conflicting status on whether on not they're "Indigenous" to the Levant according to "reliable sources". The argument for why their "Indigenous" identity seems to be denied is because (((they))) argue that Jews have origins to Western Asia/the Levant due to Judasim's roots there. Meanwhile, the section on Europe doesn't recognize the vast majority of ethnic groups native to Europe as "Indigenous" because "reliable sources" like the United Nations do not consider most ethnic Europeans to be "Indigenous" to Europe. That seems to be saved for the Sami because of their reported marginalized history in Scandinavia and a few other ethnic groups.
View attachment 4057689
Meanwhile, in Asia, the Kurds and Assyrians and the ethnic Greeks in Turkey's Asia Minor, as well several peoples in the Indian subcontinent seem to be recognized as being "Indigenous" to their respective areas without much issues. And they all seem to have a common struggle of either being genocided/targeted in historical conflicts. Or are, in present day, minorities that don't have as much recognition as majority ethnic groups in the areas.
View attachment 4057695

Yeah, so many claims of notable people get rejected and removed by Wiki editors because it is deemed "Gossip" or does not hold any "Due weight" or it's centred on "Circular reporting" or "Original Research". The latter two of which, I believe claims of Kayne stating that he is a " Nazi" would fall under.

Even JK Rowling, who wrote a whole essay on the term "TERF" has a sentence in her page stating that she rejects the 'TERF" label. Must be a lot of Harry Potter stans there vs hip-hop/Kardashian fans.

"Whites don't deserve shit" needs to be hammered down everywhere by any means necessary

 

[General Emílio Médici]

.View attachment 4055874
Very based of the Wikiquote editors to quote the guy who wrote 200 Years Together. Very Based

Man I really need to get around to reading Solzhenitsyn's stuff. That book sounds pretty good. Also interesting how they chose one of the possibly worst quotes by him, instead of one of the much better known ones like "If only we had loved freedom more" or "We know they are lying"

 

[Windows Error 98]

And there it is, Wikipedia added a school shooting to the Farms article. They're pretty obviously trying to imply to readers that we're to blame:
View attachment 4055928

Kiwi Farms - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Did the shooter have a Facebook account also? Did he post creepy stuff there? Did people on Facebook talk about the shooting? I don't know, because Wikipedia's doesn't think such details are worth mentioning in their article on Facebook (because they're not).

Incidentally, are these assertions even true? The article cites garbage sources such as the SPLC for their claims, and the article on the shooting itself is full of nonsense such as calling the Farms alt-right.

Funnily enough, the source they use on SPLC is actually fairly positive to us (this was from 2015)

The Internet sleuths at the site Kiwi Farms, where she had at one time been an active member, further tracked Souvanarrath’s activities and ascertained that she had also been an active member at a forum devoted to fascist ideology called Iron March, which is apparently operated by a man named Alexander Slavros.

The assertions are true, if very vague. Lindsay used the forum a long time ago @Heretics on Holiday. Maybe it’s kind of dumb to mention that, but I mean, we were cited by the PHD guy Langman, so thats kinda funny. That’s not the worst summation of events, I mean saying that our research was used by an expert makes us seem credible IMO. Could be worse and say that we’d cheered him on instead of mocking him

Edit: They also have the fucking… my immortal controversy there. For some reason. Well at least that one’s harmless and doesn’t negatively impact our reputation, but that’s so irrelevant that idk why they’d even bother to mention it

 

[glue eater]

Very based of the Wikiquote editors to quote the guy who wrote 200 Years Together. Very Based

People treat "200 years together" like its the International Jew or the Protocols. He's broadly sympathetic to the Jews and denies they're responsible for communism. It's just called antisemitic because he says the experiences of a Russian peasant and Jewish peasant were similar, and that the Tsar didn't order alpha stage Holocaust 0.5. Basically his literary crime is denying the special status of the Jews.

Man I really need to get around to reading Solzhenitsyn's stuff. That book sounds pretty good. Also interesting how they chose one of the possibly worst quotes by him, instead of one of the much better known ones like "If only we had loved freedom more" or "We know they are lying"

I know its a basic bitch opinion but Gulag Archipelago is his best, my favorite chapters are the one about Estonian Houdini who escaped multiple times from Gulag, and the one satirizing Soviet ethnography, pointing out that by Soviet standards, the zeks (inmates) constituted a separate nation within USSR.

To keep this somewhat on topic, disclaimer on Pedophilia article is interesting:

Talk:Pedophilia - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

A3: Covering this particular sub-topic is highly problematic for several reasons. The term "pedophilia" itself did not exist until the 19th century, and was coined specifically to refer to a mental illness with set criteria. While the condition no doubt existed prior to that, there was no way to categorize or name it, and thus no reliable source exists labeling any historical person as having "pedophilia." Labeling a historical person based on sexual behavior alone, especially a single recorded perpetration, is also problematic because not all child sexual abusers are pedophiles. The person's internal mental "drive" to engage in such behavior is a key component in diagnosis, something that is almost always missing from historical accounts. A third problem is that the vast majority of such recorded instances in history that people often think of actually would not qualify, because the victim was at or past puberty, whereas, medically, pedophilia usually only refers to prepubescent children.

 

[306h4Ge5eJUJ]

People treat "200 years together" like its the International Jew or the Protocols. He's broadly sympathetic to the Jews and denies they're responsible for communism. It's just called antisemitic because he says the experiences of a Russian peasant and Jewish peasant were similar, and that the Tsar didn't order alpha stage Holocaust 0.5. Basically his literary crime is denying the special status of the Jews.


I know its a basic bitch opinion but Gulag Archipelago is his best, my favorite chapters are the one about Estonian Houdini who escaped multiple times from Gulag, and the one satirizing Soviet ethnography, pointing out that by Soviet standards, the zeks (inmates) constituted a separate nation within USSR.

To keep this somewhat on topic, disclaimer on Pedophilia article is interesting:

Talk:Pedophilia - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

I think there used to be an old classification of child molesters into those who do it because they're attracted to children and those who do it because a kid is helpless and can't fight back. Might be referring to that.

 

[JJLiautaud]

People treat "200 years together" like its the International Jew or the Protocols. He's broadly sympathetic to the Jews and denies they're responsible for communism. It's just called antisemitic because he says the experiences of a Russian peasant and Jewish peasant were similar, and that the Tsar didn't order alpha stage Holocaust 0.5. Basically his literary crime is denying the special status of the Jews.

I genuinely wouldn't know, I haven't read 200 Years, its just pretty funny that the wikiquote editors who are btw largely the same retards running the wikipedia aslyum, picked an avowed antisemite(tm) for the quote of the day, especially with kanye running around like sperging out about der juden.

 

[teriyakiburns]

To keep this somewhat on topic, disclaimer on Pedophilia article is interesting:

Oh, so now it's suddenly important to not apply current social structures and terminology to the past.

 

[glue eater]

Oh, so now it's suddenly important to not apply current social structures and terminology to the past.

If you search the talk page archives, people suggested mentioning Mohammad as a famous/notorious pedophile, which inspired this disclaimer.

Uhm...ackshually you can't tell if Mohammad was a pedophile when he married a six year old, because we can't tell if he just liked molesting children or if he was ACKSHUALLY attracted to them.

 

[Rusty Metal Skull Gun]

If you search the talk page archives, people suggested mentioning Mohammad as a famous/notorious pedophile, which inspired this disclaimer.

Uhm...ackshually you can't tell if Mohammad was a pedophile when he married a six year old, because we can't tell if he just liked molesting children or if he was ACKSHUALLY attracted to them.

...and also we don't want to be murdered.

 

[AnOminous]

To keep this somewhat on topic, disclaimer on Pedophilia article is interesting:

The PIDF out in force, even to defend ancient dead pedos. They don't call it Wikipedo for nothing.

The notion that people weren't aware it was bad to rape children before Krafft-Ebing coined the specific word for it currently used is also idiotic, pure midwit Wikipedo bullshit.

 

[Shard]

If you search the talk page archives, people suggested mentioning Mohammad as a famous/notorious pedophile, which inspired this disclaimer.

Uhm...ackshually you can't tell if Mohammad was a pedophile when he married a six year old, because we can't tell if he just liked molesting children or if he was ACKSHUALLY attracted to them.

Where’s the “really nigga?” sticker?

 

[DaBigBopper]

The PIDF out in force, even to defend ancient dead pedos. They don't call it Wikipedo for nothing.

The notion that people weren't aware it was bad to rape children before Krafft-Ebing coined the specific word for it currently used is also idiotic, pure midwit Wikipedo bullshit.

An entire generation of French Philosophers basically thought they could argue their way into fucking kids and society could do nothing about it. It wasn't even the Greek way where you'd buttfuck some slave, but wanting to fuck your neighbors 8 year-old because you gave them candy and therefore 'consented' via a transactional agreement. I don't know when the rot started in Academia for this shit, but Institutional capture by pedo's happened in Germany and France. Germany did that whole pedo adoption thing (Kentler Experiment? I think).

Wikipedia's problem is that it basically became a a way for media assholes to validate beliefs because of their reputation.