Dumb Shit on Wikipedia

[Lucille Bluth]

Wikipedia is run by absolute cretins. If anyone thinks that would save them from a libel suit they're idiots. (In this case the fact that it's true would be the defense but if everyone knows who you're talking about being coy about it doesn't do shit.)

It's quite dumbfounding that the names of children of famous people, whether they've actually done anything in life aside from being the child of a famous person can be listed, as their policy "WP:BLPNAMES", if it is "widely sourced" by "reliable sources" and there is no indication that they are being hidden from the public. But Chris Chan can't even be mentioned. His name is mentioned in reliable sources and he has made no attempts to ever be a private person.

Speaking of Wikipedia's idiotic userbase, here's a lovely veteran user. I've seen them revert at least one edit claiming that "consensus" on talk pages supported removing information. In actuality, there was no agreement and they're just reverting things because they feel like it and have the power to. Calling them out does nothing but raise allegations of you launching a personal attack on them.

Such an outstanding example of the unbiased and well-informed Wikipedia community.

 

[WhiteNight]

I'm disappointed that not a single lie from the recent Mother Jones article about the Farms has made it into our Wikipedia article. The MJ piece was mentioned on the talk page but that's all.

 

[AnOminous]

Speaking of Wikipedia's idiotic userbase, here's a lovely veteran user. I've seen them revert at least one edit claiming that "consensus" on talk pages supported removing information.

It's pretty easy to manufacture "consensus" if you just ban anyone who disagrees.

 

[BootlegPopeye]

I'm disappointed that not a single lie from the recent Mother Jones article about the Farms has made it into our Wikipedia article. The MJ piece was mentioned on the talk page but that's all.

There was almost no original reporting in it; nearly the entire article was re-reporting outdated/wrong/lies info about KF with the exception of the quotes of various trannies crying. So essentially, it's almost all in the article already.

 

[Lucille Bluth]

If you guys have checked out the Wiki pages for "Woman" and "Man", the users had a long debate on what images should be used. People complained that not every culture would be represented in a single picture and Wikipedia's policies against image galleries. Ultimately, they chose a picture of a Ching Chong for the "Woman" article and a Pajeet for the "Man" one.

 

[General Emílio Médici]

Christ almighty what a shitshow. I assume there are pages upon pages of talk about this complete nonissue to go along right?

 

[WhiteNight]

If you guys have checked out the Wiki pages for "Woman" and "Man", the users had a long debate on what images should be used. People complained that not every culture would be represented in a single picture and Wikipedia's policies against image galleries. Ultimately, they chose a picture of a Ching Chong for the "Woman" article and a Pajeet for the "Man" one.
View attachment 4442108View attachment 4442112

This is heckin' transphobic.

FTFY.

 

[DeadwastePrime]

If you guys have checked out the Wiki pages for "Woman" and "Man", the users had a long debate on what images should be used. People complained that not every culture would be represented in a single picture and Wikipedia's policies against image galleries. Ultimately, they chose a picture of a Ching Chong for the "Woman" article and a Pajeet for the "Man" one.
View attachment 4442108View attachment 4442112

i mean, its not incorrect

 

[Ashley]

i mean, its not incorrect

For now. I'm willing to bet the TRAs are going to harp on that at one point if they haven't already started.

 

[JJLiautaud]

If you guys have checked out the Wiki pages for "Woman" and "Man", the users had a long debate on what images should be used. People complained that not every culture would be represented in a single picture and Wikipedia's policies against image galleries. Ultimately, they chose a picture of a Ching Chong for the "Woman" article and a Pajeet for the "Man" one.
View attachment 4442108View attachment 4442112

They should flip it because the most likely male is a ching chong( thank you sex selective abortions and infantacide) and the most likely female is a pajeeta.

 

[870EVO]

There was almost no original reporting in it; nearly the entire article was re-reporting outdated/wrong/lies info about KF with the exception of the quotes of various trannies crying. So essentially, it's almost all in the article already.

I have to step back for second and realize a website with just around a hundred thousand members is causing major websites and providers to intervene. Then the former Assistant Director of the FBI steps in. Then the ADL steps in. It's like, wow, what the fuck exactly did we did we do? Orchestrate 9/11? Jesus christ.

 

[Sayer of the N-Word]

If you guys have checked out the Wiki pages for "Woman" and "Man", the users had a long debate on what images should be used. People complained that not every culture would be represented in a single picture and Wikipedia's policies against image galleries. Ultimately, they chose a picture of a Ching Chong for the "Woman" article and a Pajeet for the "Man" one.
View attachment 4442108View attachment 4442112

I love it. The pajeet is in his prime and very masculine, but the woman is frumpy, middle-aged, out of shape, and overall not very feminine looking - in fact, she could be a tranny herself. Of course they would choose someone like her. They can't quite get away with installing one of their own at the top of the page yet, high above all the foids who spurned these people in high school.

 

[poko]

They should flip it because the most likely male is a ching chong( thank you sex selective abortions and infantacide) and the most likely female is a pajeeta.

I love it. The pajeet is in his prime and very masculine, but the woman is frumpy, middle-aged, out of shape, and overall not very feminine looking - in fact, she could be a tranny herself. Of course they would choose someone like her. They can't quite get away with installing one of their own at the top of the page yet, high above all the foids who spurned these people in high school.

The "woman" is Agnes Ngieng. She might be transgendered but idk:

 

[DaBigBopper]

I like how on the Farms wiki page they go out of their way to not mention Chris Chan by name instead calling him a webcomic artist.
View attachment 4360347

Honestly, I think it might be because Chris-chan will always be more notable than most Wikipedia editors. Chris, prior to fucking his mother in what might be rape, was a controversial, but loved figure and firmly part of Internet Culture. He produced memes and influenced a lot of people. That's the insane thing. Chris had a measurable impact on not just Internet Culture, but even some IRL stuff. He's been referenced in cartoons, by comedians, and hosts of other shit.
Molly White is the fail granddaughter of the Stewart Little writer and will never fucking influence culture beyond pushing a narrative given to her. Imagine how pissed she must be that a fat autistic Transexual from Hicksville, Virginia is more notable than her.

Wikipedia Editors do it for free and carry water for an uncaring machine that would erase their contributions in seconds. At least the faggot mods here do it for laughs.

 

[Sayer of the N-Word]

The "woman" is Agnes Ngieng. She might be transgendered but idk:

View attachment 4456292

I mean that they went with a female who had so few female characteristics, a Chinese version of Pat, because they knew that using an actual tranny like Brianna Wu would draw massive amounts of negative attention, but putting a feminine looking female in that spot would also be unacceptable because trannies and their allies resent the notion that a typical woman looks female. Tranny discourse these days is much less interested in tearing down men and males, so no one cares that the photo there is of a man with very strong male characteristics.

 

[ditto]

Haven't seen the List of Internet phenomena (archive) metioned.

Should be called the "List of Reddit phenomena" because it's just the most unnotable basic bitch memes and references. Reminds me of the "FanFiction" sections on TvTropes.



No mention of anything remotely spicey like Project Chanology, Pool's Closed, Chris-chan or even Lolcowdom. The Wikipedia entry for "Lolcow" just redirects to Kiwi Farms.

 

[fat ass]

Today's Did you Know!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melissa_Ong

Is this a man or a woman? Genuinely cannot tell with that Norwood 3 hairline (or even worse THAT was the image they went for for her official Wikipedia page....)

 

[teriyakiburns]

Today's Did you Know!
View attachment 4487524
View attachment 4487536View attachment 4487568

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melissa_Ong

Is this a man or a woman? Genuinely cannot tell with that Norwood 3 hairline (or even worse THAT was the image they went for for her official Wikipedia page....)

Woman, with a deliberately unflattering angle and style. I don't know if she's making fun of troons or just retarded. Probably retarded.

 

[General Emílio Médici]

Jesus Cristo la creatura

 

[Michaelsoft]

Today's Did you Know!
View attachment 4487524
View attachment 4487536View attachment 4487568

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melissa_Ong

Is this a man or a woman? Genuinely cannot tell with that Norwood 3 hairline (or even worse THAT was the image they went for for her official Wikipedia page....)

>"Step Chickens" on TikTok replaced their profile pictures with an image (shown) of Melissa Ong, whom they call "Mother Hen"?
I don't know what any of that means whatsoever or what makes it encyclopedic. Sounds like something that came out of a drunk GPT-2.