Rather than helping anyone to edit, these tranny trannies on the site contribute to the worst possible things.
Wikipedia has always been one-sided with their own political party or religion they believe in and want everyone else to believe in.
The whole post you're responding to is how the 2011 and 2013 articles drastically changed in that 2012 gave both sides of the issue and maintained some neutrality, while the 2013 article was pure OBAMA GUD REPIGS BAD and outright lied about facts that were included in the 2011 article.
It's probably impossible to survive an anti-SLAPP on something like that, because it's pure opinion. Of course, that's why Wikipedia is a total fraud of an encyclopedia, because it routinely states opinions as fact.
Wikipedia has a fleet of lawyers to ward off such challenges, and they rarely have to intervene in article content.
You can obviously sue the actual editor if you can locate them, and despite § 230, they actually have a habit of suddenly remembering their WP:BLP when credible threats of litigation are brought.
Hmm, this might be a way to get back NinjaRobotPirate, Geraldo Perez and their legion of yes men.
The worst part is knowing that Wikipedo deliberately uses the most biased sources they can to justify those smear-terms while refusing to allow even milquetoast conservative sources to be used in criticism of leftists. I remember seeing one article where the reference for claiming someone was Fascist was fucking Jacobin, an openly communist website. Game's rigged bad, and there's no good way to fight against it due to defamation laws practically being built to make it impossible for public figures to sue people for blatantly smearing them because of an "actual malice clause" being so strict that unless you suddenly became broke you've already lost.
I never knew there was an actual policy to spell Kiev the way it's been spelled for centuries in English on Wikipedia (provided it isn't post-1991 Ukraine). Probably because it's easy to find random articles on medieval Eastern Europe or sometimes even Imperial Russian/Soviet era stuff where the neologism is inserted, alongside other neologisms for placenames in modern Ukraine. Wikipedia clearly doesn't enforce this rule much, and you never see this sort of obsessive drive to call Turkey "Turkiye" or Saigon "Ho Chi Minh City".
Well remember, Wikipedia is very inconsistent with most of the articles and it might be due to editor's laziness.
It has more to do with the fact people with crippling autism are incredibly energetic about protecting their wikiturf, even if in their real lives they're hip deep in cat shit and hoarder debris.
Oh boy, more urbanists complaining about how people being able to drive is a threat to everyone because the mentally disabled might run into traffic.
