- Joined
- Oct 8, 2015
It has to be out of spite at this point. The fact they refuse to even say his name in the Kiwi article says it all. This site was started to discuss Chris Chan and they won't even mention him by name.
Dumb Shit on Wikipedia
- Thread starter AnOminous
- Start date
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2022
Also, have a look at the edit history for Ruckersville, Virginia. Not only do they revert any mention of you-know-who, they delete the edit so you can't even see it after the fact. Normally they only do this for libel or copyvios.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Too bad we don't have a cool shit on Wikipedia thread because this would belong there.
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2023
Vsause's definition of 'famous person' was a mistake.
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2019
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2021
Beat me to it. Insane that this was ever on there. Literally who twitter troons now get articles. What a joke of an "information source"
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2022
Why don't they just lock the page under a "active conflict" label and have a big disclamer that is will be outdated and likely incorrect until things calm down? Wouldn't that be easier than playing constant whack-a-mole on the main thing?
What am I saying, they have to enforce the consensus.
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2020
These restrictions are cancer. They're supposed to "mediate conflicts" but most of the time they just end up pivoting to one side and one side only, voiding any sort of supposed neutrality. A classic example of this are Balkans-related pages: almost all of them boil down to "SERB BAD, KEBAB/CROAT GOOD" without a hint of subtlety. They even recently removed a descriptor for the American crime coverup known as Republjik Kosova (as the Serbs call it) that used to state that under UN Resolution 1244 Kosovo is an integral part of Serbia.... because, according to their psychotic worldviews, it's apparently a state even though everything else points otherwise.
Henri Barbusse
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2022
Replace the list with "All the good ones."
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2021
The seethe in the Australian Referendum article is great.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2022
"The entire section on conspiracy theories is a total attack on No and Right Wingers only"
"No it isn't. We have both sides represented there."
"....There literally isn't a single mention of Yes voter lies or Left Wing opposition..?"
"MUH RELIABLE SOURCES!"
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2021
Literally 80% of Israel-Palestine Articles are Extended Protected on Wikipedia.
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2020
I am not joking, but the Jews captured all those articles and locked them down. Then mussies, and their left wing dogs snuck in some of their side. Now, you have an actual Israeli Vs Pali conflict over the articles about the very same thing.
Its meta wiki, its creations are extensions of the very subject, until the thing and the concept are one and the same.
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2022
I've noticed for articles on malls now they get headlined with "automobile-oriented", which is a term only brain-damaged "urbanists" use.
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2019
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2022
And his hyperfixation seems to be genitalia. These people...
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2015
Was doing some research on a streaming platform called Rumble today and ended up on the alt-tech page and noticed the editors managed to sneak terrorism into the intro.
Also notice the "This article is about internet platforms that cater to extremists" Just giving away any sense of neutrality in the first line of the article. Terrorism is when you let people speak freely yeah that makes sense you fucking retards.
Also notice the "This article is about internet platforms that cater to extremists" Just giving away any sense of neutrality in the first line of the article. Terrorism is when you let people speak freely yeah that makes sense you fucking retards.
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2022
Letting people speak freely allows for wrong opinions and conclusions. You can't allow that!
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2022
Funny how all the people who label anyone they don't like as anti-semitic or a terrorist don't seem to have a problem with Hamas.
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2021
Not to be one of the "dood, imagine if the sides were reversed" niggas but if you wrote something similar on a page relating to some left-wing social media platform your edit would immediately be revoked by a powerjanny. Who are these "researchers and journalists" anyways? Whatevs, I haven't expected wikipedia to be neutral since 2016. Lol how the author wrote both "alt-right" and "far-right" next to each other, is there a difference???