- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
That's why I consider it a fake encyclopedia. It doesn't even pretend that its bogus "NPOV" policy even means anything any more. Super jannies like Gorilla Warfare openly admit they're only using the site as a propaganda outlet.
Dumb Shit on Wikipedia
- Thread starter AnOminous
- Start date
-
🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2017
Remember: If they thought Trump wouldn’t get elected, they wouldn’t need propaganda to convince us he won’t win.That whole article is ridden with TDS. Even the 2020 totally legitimiate election isn't as deranged and focused on propaganda as the 2024 election page. It is so bad it reads like a second Trump article.
Is any of this important?
This section goes on for like 3 more paragraphs.
You have to scroll through all this shit before you actually see the candidates and who has endorsed who and all the polling data. Unfortunately doesn't stop there. Get a load of this wall of text for a campaign issue.
Democracy is expected to be a large issue in the 2024 election. An AP-NORC poll of 1,074 adults conducted between November 30 to December 4, 2023, found that 62% of adults said democracy could be at risk depending on who wins the next election.[242]
Polling before the election has indicated profound dissatisfaction with the state of American democracy.[243][244][245] Liberals tend to believe that conservatives are threatening the country with Christian nationalist autocratic tendencies and their attempts to overturn the 2020 election.[246] Some Republicans are concerned that Trump's former impeachment and four criminal indictments are attempts to influence the election and keep him from office.[247] However, there is no evidence that Trump's criminal trials are "election interference" orchestrated by Joe Biden and the Democratic Party.[82][43] Trump has repeated false claims that the 2020 election was rigged and stolen from him.[13]
Donald Trump's 2024 campaign has been criticized by legal experts, historians, and political scientists for making increasingly violent and authoritarian statements,[248][249][250] which some believe the Trump campaign is intentionally leaning into.[251] Trump's platform calls for the vast expansion of presidential powers and the executive branch over every part of the federal government.[252] Trump has called for stripping employment protections for thousands of career civil service employees and replacing them with political loyalists if deemed an "obstacle to his agenda" within federal agencies, the United States Intelligence Community, State Department, and Department of Defense.[253] Trump has repeatedly stated his intention to have the Justice Department investigate and arrest his domestic political rivals, judges, prosecutors, and witnesses involved in his criminal trials.[254][255][256] Trump has previously tried to prosecute his political rivals and would have fewer checks on his power in a second term.[257] Project 2025 is a proposed plan by the Heritage Foundation to centralize power into the executive branch for conservative policies to be enacted without input from the judicial branch, legislative branch or local government. The plan received some support from the Republican Party. The document was written in part by former members of the Trump administration such as Russell Vought, and John McEntee[258] while Donald Trump stated he is unfamiliar with parts of the plan.[259][260][261]
Trump's campaign has been noted for using increasingly dehumanizing and violent rhetoric against his political enemies.[123][222][262][126][263][264] Trump has promised to pardon those charged for their involvement in the January 6, 2021, Capitol attack and has called those charged "hostages" and "great, great patriots."[265][266][267] Trump has played down but not ruled out violence after the 2024 election if he does not win, stating, "it depends."[268]
Harris was tasked by Biden with protecting democracy through voting rights legislation through her work on the For the People Act. Harris has supported efforts to defend election workers and counter Republican efforts to restrict voting following the 2020 presidential election.[188] Harris says she supports efforts to improve racial justice. Harris previously supported the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act.[188] Harris has supported demilitarizing police departments, and has pushed back against calls to defund the police.[234] Harris has stated her support to pass the Freedom to Vote Act and John Lewis Rights Voting Rights Advancement Act if elected.[269]
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2024
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2019
Chemical articles on Wikipedia are pozzed with politics too. Is there any topic that is not pozzed?
Sounds based. Who said those?
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2024
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2024
The entry for 'Cats & Dogs 3: Paws Unite!' is much shorter than it should be. Also, the header image is of lower quality than CCTV footage from the 80s. Keep in mind that this movie released in TWENTY TWENTY and was a commercial hit.
Sargon's wife's son
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2019
it's a solid film all of the cats and dogs movies on
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2019
Reason: muh koppieywruyt ("fair use")
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2022
I can't believe this hasn't been brought up before:
You listen to anti-SJW youtube talking head, next thing you know you're building bombs for total nigger death. Many such cases!
Wikipedia article about "Far-left" cannot include an image of hammer and sickle or any communist dictator because "They don't represent the far-left" meanwhile "Far-right" article contains half a dozen swastikas.
You listen to anti-SJW youtube talking head, next thing you know you're building bombs for total nigger death. Many such cases!
Wikipedia article about "Far-left" cannot include an image of hammer and sickle or any communist dictator because "They don't represent the far-left" meanwhile "Far-right" article contains half a dozen swastikas.
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2017
They're right. I used to be a normal innocent person who just liked scrolling through Youtube and then I discovered Andy Warski and Mundane Matt and next thing I knew I wanted to AIM AIM AIM some "boulders" (bombs) into government buildings.
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2023
Looks like wikipedia is doing a new experiment with browser extensions and LLMs. From what I gather, they want to have an in-house AI help guide normies through contributing. Consider how bad the average contributor is and how confidently wrong AI can be, then realize who will be running that AI model and directing it. Terrifying, right?
I first saw this linked in a popup on a random article while signed in on my very old, now inactive, account.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:DErenrich-WMF/Add_A_Fact_Experiment (Requires login on confirmed account)
I first saw this linked in a popup on a random article while signed in on my very old, now inactive, account.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:DErenrich-WMF/Add_A_Fact_Experiment (Requires login on confirmed account)
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2022
I can't believe this hasn't been brought up before:
You listen to anti-SJW youtube talking head, next thing you know you're building bombs for total nigger death. Many such cases!
Love how the last paragraph end with "also left wingers are trying to make their own to make people leftists instead of rightists" and Wikipedia doesn't seem to have any concept of how that might also be a problem. Fucking MovieBob morality.
SuccubusFeeder
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2024
I watched one Sargon of Akkad video and now, oops, I accidentally killed every single nigger on Earth.
Also big thanks to the last sane wikipedo user who added this paragraph
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2022
That study and the entire moral panic around it was made up by communists mad that they were having pushback. They convinced social media and youtube to start going full draconian in their censorship and Susan Wojik to start fucking with the algorithm to push "reliable sources" instead of actual youtubers when you look for things.
Breadtube was a attempt to emulate what they thought was going on but towards left wing. It failed even with literal glownigger funding going to people like Contrapoints and massive boost from powers that be/
Breadtube was a attempt to emulate what they thought was going on but towards left wing. It failed even with literal glownigger funding going to people like Contrapoints and massive boost from powers that be/
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2015
This thread is so depressing.
Then WHOAAAAAA you go to right-wing and shocking! Much, much longer and is much more focused on the present.
It almost seems too obvious to even mention but nothing like the "alt-right pipeline" article exists for the left. There is not a single page on breadtubers or fringe leftist subreddits radicalizing people. In fact if you go to the Wiki article on political radicalization and scroll down to "left-wing" it basically pretends like left-wing political violence in the west stopped in the 90s. Not a single mention of the 2020 riots or Antifa. No mention of CHAZ or CHOP. No mention of the black supremacist Dallas police shooter who killed 5 police officers. This is it. 3 paragraphs no links to anything else.
Then WHOAAAAAA you go to right-wing and shocking! Much, much longer and is much more focused on the present.
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2015
There is also zero mention of political radicalization on Aaron Bushnell's article. The word "radicalized" isn't used once. They literally quote the reddit post where he says there are were no innocents at the music festival Hamas massacred people at but NOPE! Guy who was documented to have followed dozens of radical left-wing subs was not radicalized.
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2022
To these "people" the left-right axis is literally a good-evil axis. They see all leftism as inherently good and all right wingers as bad. They cannot accept otherwise.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
This dumb shit brought to you by the lie-filled Tenacious Unicorn Ranch propaganda article.
Note, this is a now-dead "ranch" run by a bunch of insane troons that killed dozens of alpacas and then went belly-up. It's full of absolute bullshit and of course, nutcase Gorilla Warfare is desperate to keep anything resembling truth out of it.
Note, this is a now-dead "ranch" run by a bunch of insane troons that killed dozens of alpacas and then went belly-up. It's full of absolute bullshit and of course, nutcase Gorilla Warfare is desperate to keep anything resembling truth out of it.
There's been some recent-ish discussion on the talk page of the TUR wiki article:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Tenacious_Unicorn_Ranch#Updates_badly_needed
A couple people complain about inaccuracies in the wiki article and how it doesn't mention any of the controversies. Wiki admin GorillaWarfare (aka Molly White) steps in to stonewall them with rules-lawyering about reliable sources. I like how JSory pointed out that there's very little chance that any "reliable source" will ever bother to write about the Tranch again. Really shows how dumb the Wiki rules are.
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2015
Molly White is cool with animal murder!
SuccubusFeeder
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2024
Exactly, the whole "muh Altright pipeline" and "muh radicalisation" are just casus belli for internet totalitarian censorship.
Also worth mentioning that Wikipedia likes to call Right Wing terrorists "terrorists" and Left Wing terrorists "militants". Nice language trick faggots.
But I don't think the BLM riots were left wing political violence, just niggers being niggers.