Dumb Shit on Wikipedia

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
  • Like
Reactions: Drama Fan
WhiteNight said:
Along these lines, the Muslim grooming gang article (discussed upthread) survived attempted deletion:

Despite the title, the text refers to "the Muslim grooming gang panic" as a "moral panic".


And indeed there's yet another move discussion to change the title to "Grooming Gang Moral Panic in UK" (or some such variation). The discussion has filled multiple pages:

One user suggested saying "conspiracy theories" instead of "panic". Because of course.
Click to expand...
I'm not sure how, but on twitter a lib dem tranny activist called Sarah noble has been accused of being behind the move.

1728424016652.png

1728423936377.png
 
  • Horrifying
  • Islamic Content
  • Lunacy
Reactions: UnsufficentBoobage, Narwhal, Core Theorist and 24 others
Trig.Point said:
I'm not sure how, but on twitter a lib dem tranny activist called Sarah noble has been accused of being behind the move.
Click to expand...
If you see a picrew that looks like that, it is invariably some disgusting fat fuck who you can smell even through a jpg of them because they haven't showered in months.
 
  • Agree
  • Horrifying
  • Like
Reactions: UnsufficentBoobage, graywolf88, Drama Fan and 11 others
SmallKiwi said:
If you type "human" on the search bar, "human penis size" is the second thing that shows up. Wiki trannies think that's more important than stuff like "human rights".
Click to expand...
Not even that. Human rights is third on the list right under Human Sexuality and right above Human Penis (As opposed to what other penis article?)
Screenshot 2024-10-08 203419.png
 
  • Horrifying
  • Lunacy
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: UnsufficentBoobage, SanctedElectromagnetism, geckogoy and 11 others
WhiteNight said:
Along these lines, the Muslim grooming gang article (discussed upthread) survived attempted deletion:

Despite the title, the text refers to "the Muslim grooming gang panic" as a "moral panic".


And indeed there's yet another move discussion to change the title to "Grooming Gang Moral Panic in UK" (or some such variation). The discussion has filled multiple pages:

One user suggested saying "conspiracy theories" instead of "panic". Because of course.
Click to expand...
I'd be willing to bet that next, they will be targetting these pages: -


While not all of them involve groups of "Asians", most of them do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UnsufficentBoobage, winderson_silva, lolcow yoghurt and 1 other person
Let's see what else we can find about human penises.

Users point out that the page has way too many dickpics and some question whether fetishists have posed these. By my count there are 11 human penises depicted (3 appear in multiple images illustrating various stages of erection). Some pruder users argue that the headline image should be an illustration so as not traumatize the children. You can look it up yourself but that top image isn't erotic. Still, there are some other criticisms.

I actually agree with Lenie. If you're going for encyclopedic and medical style, why not go natural? The caption has been amended to say the pubic hair has been deliberately removed so we can get a better sense of the anatomy. Sure.
penis1.jpg
The two replies disagree on the size of said penis but both are very keen on it. Aliy has more to say elsewhere on the page.
penis2.jpg
A girldick fan, as it turns out. But other users show wikipedia's transphobic bias and quash the idea. Beyond penises, I wonder what else interests Aliy?
penis3.jpg
 
  • Islamic Content
  • Lunacy
  • Informative
Reactions: Kaiba Cuqk63, UnsufficentBoobage, MoonDune and 8 others
Mudkipcorn said:
Users point out that the page has way too many dickpics and some question whether fetishists have posed these. By my count there are 11 human penises depicted (3 appear in multiple images illustrating various stages of erection). Some pruder users argue that the headline image should be an illustration so as not traumatize the children. You can look it up yourself but that top image isn't erotic. Still, there are some other criticisms.
Click to expand...
Pretty much every sex related article is fetishism. Take a look at some of the images on the fingering article. Two are poorly done drawings of a man and woman fingering their assholes. Wikiimages is even worse with all the sexual fetishism going on with people posting their own NSFW content there.
 
  • Islamic Content
Reactions: UnsufficentBoobage and Toji Suzuhara
SmallKiwi said:
If you type "human" on the search bar, "human penis size" is the second thing that shows up. Wiki trannies think that's more important than stuff like "human rights".
Click to expand...
This reminds me of when I wanted to learn more about the rock supergroup Cream but some obscure 80s hentai managed to appear above it. The word creampie also appeared.
878A38A2-051C-4100-8474-2AD83F2368C3.jpeg
 
  • Horrifying
  • Like
  • Lunacy
Reactions: UnsufficentBoobage, Pedophobe, geckogoy and 16 others
Nigger Cobson said:
The word creampie also appeared.
View attachment 6501807
Click to expand...
Why does she have a white worm coming out of her urethra? How has she managed to clench only the upper third of her buttcheeks? Couldn't they get one of their furaffinity friends to draw something a little more realistic?

I don't know why I'm asking so many questions when the answer to every single one is the same word: Autism.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: UnsufficentBoobage, Blue Slushie, Vecr and 3 others
Corpun said:
Pretty much every sex related article is fetishism. Take a look at some of the images on the fingering article. Two are poorly done drawings of a man and woman fingering their assholes. Wikiimages is even worse with all the sexual fetishism going on with people posting their own NSFW content there.
Click to expand...
Right, there was a years-long battle between editors fighting to ensure their penis was used as the image for the penis article
 
  • Horrifying
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: UnsufficentBoobage, Cane Skretteburg, 306h4Ge5eJUJ and 10 others
Corpun said:
Pretty much every sex related article is fetishism. Take a look at some of the images on the fingering article. Two are poorly done drawings of a man and woman fingering their assholes. Wikiimages is even worse with all the sexual fetishism going on with people posting their own NSFW content there.
Click to expand...
Does anyone remember prolific editor "seedfeeder?" Most of his edits were adding pictures of white men coming in the mouths of colored women, I mean women of color, regardless of the relevance to the actual article. This weirdo put up hundreds of his own pornographic pictures on random articles for years.
 
  • Horrifying
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: UnsufficentBoobage, Big Nasty, Beardless Lenin and 17 others
AnOminous said:
Does anyone remember prolific editor "seedfeeder?" Most of his edits were adding pictures of white men coming in the mouths of colored women, I mean women of color, regardless of the relevance to the actual article. This weirdo put up hundreds of his own pornographic pictures on random articles for years.
Click to expand...
There are still a fair number of them:
NSFW link to search results
 
  • Islamic Content
  • Horrifying
  • Feels
Reactions: UnsufficentBoobage, 306h4Ge5eJUJ, From The Uncanny Valley and 5 others
Be prepared for some major shit-stirring on my side of Wikipedia this Oct-Nov-Dec. Last year the American Ornithological Committee decided they were going to rename 80 something birds because of muh racism and black people (basically every single bird named after a person because they were a white person and not a lesbian nigger). The change is set to take place in 2024 likely in November. This change has been pretty unpopular (especially with birders who are, shocker, mostly boomers) and since Wikipedia will follow suit too, it's pretty likely that some shit-flinging (edit wars and name changes) will take place. :popcorn:
 
  • Informative
  • Horrifying
Reactions: UnsufficentBoobage, Cane Skretteburg, Beardless Lenin and 11 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back