Dumb Shit on Wikipedia

[x3firehexx]

Let's see what else we can find about human penises.

Users point out that the page has way too many dickpics and some question whether fetishists have posed these. By my count there are 11 human penises depicted (3 appear in multiple images illustrating various stages of erection). Some pruder users argue that the headline image should be an illustration so as not traumatize the children. You can look it up yourself but that top image isn't erotic. Still, there are some other criticisms.

I actually agree with Lenie. If you're going for encyclopedic and medical style, why not go natural? The caption has been amended to say the pubic hair has been deliberately removed so we can get a better sense of the anatomy. Sure.
View attachment 6501601
The two replies disagree on the size of said penis but both are very keen on it. Aliy has more to say elsewhere on the page.
View attachment 6501599
A girldick fan, as it turns out. But other users show wikipedia's transphobic bias and quash the idea. Beyond penises, I wonder what else interests Aliy?
View attachment 6501598

Someone go tell ally porn sites exist for this very purpose.
Troons need to stay out of wikipedia, i don't want this shit on there. This is wikipedia FFS

 

[AnOminous]

Someone go tell ally porn sites exist for this very purpose.
Troons need to stay out of wikipedia, i don't want this shit on there. This is wikipedia FFS

The more it looks like the fanfic site run by degenerates and mentally ill perverts that it is, the better.

 

[Adolf Kitler]

 

[Kulee Baba]

It makes me happy when I find an article that still has the banality of old school wikipedia. In this case the once standard "In Popular Culture" section

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_enemy_of_my_enemy_is_my_friend.

For those who are too young to remember 2000s Wikipedia pretty much every Wikipedia article that had a standard topic would have "In popular culture" or "Trivia." The XKCD comic posted below lampoons it. If an episode of The Simpsons or Family Guy made a reference to a historical figure/event it would have to be detailed.

 

[Smiggadigga]

For those who are too young to remember 2000s Wikipedia pretty much every Wikipedia article that had a standard topic would have "In popular culture" or "Trivia."

In popular culture still exists on some articles nowadays but boy did "trivia" bring me back. I think I've seen maybe four articles since 2019 that still had that section. RETVRN

 

[LillyTheBestGirl]

It's less of a "dumb shit" and more of a "disgusting pedos being openly disgusting pedos" but I was surfing Wikipedia reading about spooky movies, when I hovered on the name of Jeepers Creepers' director, Victor Salva, and got this lovely popup.



Intrigued, I read his bio – he's a total piece of shit who molested a kid and was allowed by studios to get back to movie-making after he served his three-year-old (!!!) sentence, out of which he only spent 15 months (!!!) in prison. But then I looked at the article discussion and found this gem of a comment:



I'm glad people called him out in the replies, but holy shit, how can you type these words and not realize you're giving yourself out as a total pedo?

 

[Mai]

View attachment 6535120

What the fuck. Please archive the convo so we can see the whole thing and this creep's account.

 

[Flaming_Barghast]

No, those shamans probably dressed as women all the time and were considered women because very few Indians had a conception of homosexuals. If you were a man attracted to men and liked it up the ass, you were considered a woman. That's in line with every other instance of crossdressing shamans and subgroups among Native Americans, and you can't even blame troon activism since there's a citation to a 17th century Spanish explorer noticing there were men dressed as women. Doesn't say what page, and I don't feel like fixing Wikipedia's mistake by actually going through that book and finding it, but I pulled up that book on Google Books and searched "sodomía" (sodomy) and got some results so it's probably true.

Most of the rest of that text is an interpretation by a single activist, the other parts by another activist. It probably reflects whatever Chile's "I'm 1/16 Indian" types believe their supposed ancestors believed, so either garbled nonsense read out of an old anthropology book or straight up invented shit.

There's actually something some Kiwi's here might not know since not a lot is written about it, but take with a grain of salt because, while it was said by natives, most of their info is passed down orally, so there is no way to verify what I said.

Basically, third genders were treated as one entire demographic. If you were gay, a "failed wo/man" (i.e. liked doing things not normal for your roll, like a woman choosing to join hunting or battle parties, or men preferring scavenging and dress making) or even just looked too masculine/feminine, you'd be assigned this "other". Same thing happened with people believed to be shift changers, or people who had such a close connection to an animal that they could turn into it. These people were either feared or scorned (shift changers were both, seen as traitors to their own race if they were a prey animal because they usually tried to lead the herds away, or a potential danger to the tribe if they had a predatory shift.)
These people often had entirely seperate huts outside the villages, and it wasn't unusual for them to have one of 2 things happen- be forced away from burial sites because they were too impure, or forced closer to these psudo graveyards because they were too close to the other world. (I.e. shift changers were allowed, troons and gays were not)
I don't think I was ever told the reason shift changers were forced there, but I do know the boomers very much still believe in it. I've heard several people of one tribe each go hushed if I brought up the potential shift changer by name, like it was a curse.
Despite what troons think, they have by far the most ridged familial structures you could make. You did NOT deviate for any reason, as it was seen as upsetting the natural order- the order they themselves find to be apart of and guardians for.
ironically it settled down a lot more with christianity, it's still looked down upon to be different, even being a bookworm or interested in studies are seen as too white and you will be outcasted over it.
source- my brothers MIL who is directly best friends with the chief, and my brother who most often helped village elders and got to hear a lot of deeply held beliefs they don't often share as reward.

Also to add- even if women were pretty butch, they were still usually not allowed to join parties, it was seen as too dangerous and women were too valuable, even the ugly ones. I can count on one hand from stories of various indigenous histories where a woman was even mentioned near a kill during a hunt, and were usually there to keep watch if they snuck with the warriors deep into enemy territory. I think 1 or 2 were solely about the woman being a true warrior, and it's because she did all the trials by herself with no help.
(I.e. kill an enemy with a dagger making no sound, ride out on a stollen rival tribes horses, count coux, or touch an enemy in their camp/steal their feather as proof and get back without being caught, and I think 3 or 4 other things specific to the tribe, but those couple are universal.

Edit: off topic but my favorite story regarding the last one, and the BEST story I've ever fucking heard, was of the last indian warrior. They were either apache or something else, not cherokee cuz those have been a joke tribe forever. Anyway, a very old warrior specific tribe, and he had to adjust the qualifications a little bit, but he did several WITH SOMEONE TO WATCH IN THE SAME. FUCKING. NIGHT.
He stole an enemies scimitar/sabre and stabbed them in the heart from behind, taking it and his scalp for proof of his first kill, (this earns 1 feather. Every feather on an indian is a life taken. It used to be done as young as 8 so it wasn't included in the rites, but he did because it was important to treat your first death with utmost respect. Dunno how the scalping part honored it but w/e) he managed to take some plans from a commanding officers tent while everyone was having dinner and never got caught, stole a fucking helicopter, and burned a bunch of their rations to cover the sight and sound of the theft of the copter (was near a forest)
Dude was crazy and fucking survived the front lines.
I think he unironically got an entire ass head dress from the amount of enemies he killed. I wish I could find the quote but I remember hearing him say something along the lines of "Today I avenged the historic fallen of my tribe with the deaths of German invaders and defended my home for more warriors to continue my path."

 

[Flexo]

I think he unironically got an entire ass head dress from the amount of enemies he killed. I wish I could find the quote but I remember hearing him say something along the lines of "Today I avenged the historic fallen of my tribe with the deaths of German invaders and defended my home for more warriors to continue my path."

Was it this guy?

 

[Calandrino]

It's less of a "dumb shit" and more of a "disgusting pedos being openly disgusting pedos" but I was surfing Wikipedia reading about spooky movies, when I hovered on the name of Jeepers Creepers' director, Victor Salva, and got this lovely popup.

View attachment 6535121

Intrigued, I read his bio – he's a total piece of shit who molested a kid and was allowed by studios to get back to movie-making after he served his three-year-old (!!!) sentence, out of which he only spent 15 months (!!!) in prison. But then I looked at the article discussion and found this gem of a comment:

View attachment 6535120

I'm glad people called him out in the replies, but holy shit, how can you type these words and not realize you're giving yourself out as a total pedo?

"A wonderful film called Powder" he says. Maybe Salva could've ridden out the controversy if he made a movie that wasn't a gay pedo persecution fantasy. I'm like 50/50 this guy is trolling anyway.

 

[Flaming_Barghast]

Was it this guy?

It was a news article I believe that I heard from but yes!

 

[Sargon's wife's son]

It was a news article I believe that I heard from but yes!

I do love these people betraying Native Americans is peaceful I would much rather be thought of if I was a wagon burner as someone who gave the white man as good as he got and was a group of warriors rather than a bunch of helpless children.
Countries that have never owned the freedom through blade and steel have this persecution fetish you never see the Japanese complaining about American colonialism because they turned around and adopted all of the white man's ways of war and then kicked the **** out of the Russians.

The Chinese are forever back broken simply due to the fact that they've never defeated the white man the mongolians don't count.
Same thing with the jeets they will forever live in the white man's shadow

 

[From The Uncanny Valley]

I do love these people betraying Native Americans is peaceful I would much rather be thought of if I was a wagon burner as someone who gave the white man as good as he got and was a group of warriors rather than a bunch of helpless children.
Countries that have never owned the freedom through blade and steel have this persecution fetish you never see the Japanese complaining about American colonialism because they turned around and adopted all of the white man's ways of war and then kicked the **** out of the Russians.

The Chinese are forever back broken simply due to the fact that they've never defeated the white man the mongolians don't count.
Same thing with the jeets they will forever live in the white man's shadow

Some of the older ones complain about muh internment camps.

 

[Sargon's wife's son]

Some of the older ones complain about muh internment camps.

The Japanese who live in the United states are about as Japanese as fake samurai swords

 

[Flaming_Barghast]

I do love these people betraying Native Americans is peaceful I would much rather be thought of if I was a wagon burner as someone who gave the white man as good as he got and was a group of warriors rather than a bunch of helpless children.
Countries that have never owned the freedom through blade and steel have this persecution fetish you never see the Japanese complaining about American colonialism because they turned around and adopted all of the white man's ways of war and then kicked the **** out of the Russians.

The Chinese are forever back broken simply due to the fact that they've never defeated the white man the mongolians don't count.
Same thing with the jeets they will forever live in the white man's shadow

Natives near me have a very love hate relationship with white farmers. It's really funny, actually. They'll give whites shit for "being too much of a coward to drink with an indian" and sometimes you'll hear the other go "I don't wanna get stabbed when I have work in the mornin."
Indians might steal shit from whitey, whitey will beat the fuck out of the thief and neither presses charges cuz, well it was settled.
Also natives love beating the fuck out of protestors near pipelines because it's an excuse to assault white racist fucks. (Seriously, I've heard them go "bububut you're native! You're one with nature and can surely feel her pain!")
My husband hates em because, in his words, "they're just diet niggers that can actually plan how to fuck you over". But that's kinda the reason I like em, they're fun.

 

[Sargon's wife's son]

Natives near me have a very love hate relationship with white farmers. It's really funny, actually. They'll give whites shit for "being too much of a coward to drink with an indian" and sometimes you'll hear the other go "I don't wanna get stabbed when I have work in the mornin."

I've never had a problem with the Redman the red men are honourable people unlike the hood rats

 

[Mai]

Can someone explain to me how the Wikipedia page for MLK lists James Earl Ray as the shooter even though it has been proven in an American court that he wasn't? Guess maintaining the "consensus" is important as ever even though the trial happened 25 YEARS AGO.

 

[Sargon's wife's son]

Can someone explain to me how the Wikipedia page for MLK lists James Earl Ray as the shooter even though it has been proven in an American court that he wasn't? Guess maintaining the "consensus" is important as ever even though the trial happened 25 YEARS AGO.

The Wikipedia page still has a conspiracy theory on the reichstag prior saying Hitler playing the whole thing left wing conspiracy theories are totally OK to have on Wikipedia like McCarthyism even though we have proof that most of the people McCarthy went after with Soviet spies

 

[General Emílio Médici]

Guess maintaining the "consensus" is important as ever even though the trial happened 25 YEARS AGO.

Exactly. Wikipedia will continue to lie until it is literally impossible to keep lying, and even then keep trying to hold up the lies.

 

[Toji Suzuhara]

Exactly. Wikipedia will continue to lie until it is literally impossible to keep lying, and even then keep trying to hold up the lies.

If you tell a lie big enough on an article and keep repeating it, users will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the Wiki can shield the users from the political, editorial and/or social consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the Wiki to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the Wiki.

-Jimbo Wales