- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
I'm not sure why this exists.Lists of LGBT figures in fiction and myth - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
I can one-up that.
List of lists of lists - Wikipedia

What can I say about this?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm not sure why this exists.Lists of LGBT figures in fiction and myth - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
What can I say about saying about saying about it?I can one-up that.
List of lists of lists - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
View attachment 1020145
What can I say about this?
I used it to find a funny list earlier today.I can one-up that.
List of lists of lists - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
View attachment 1020145
What can I say about this?
Love the pencil dick on that faggotfound a way to look at posts without paying. no moderators, this shit is going to be a mess
Shalom, fellow zionists. I came across this article, in which a "pro-Israel organization" called the Israel Group is putting together a DOXING HATE MEGAPHONE to truename wikipedia editors who they perceive as being pervasively biased against God's chosen people and the nation of Israel. And I just thought, man, I gotta share this here.
They've released five, so far, but these are pretty amateurish by the glittering gold standard set here at the Kiwi Farms. Still, they are vowing to ramp up activities in the coming year. With Yahweh's help I hope this produces some quality laughs as they march around the walls of wikipedia blowing their dox trumpet until the servers crumble into dust.
The Israel Group Wikipedia’s War Against Israel | The Israel Group
[vc_row][vc_column width=2/3][vc_column_text] For more than a decade, Wikipedia—the number one online educational resource globally—has allowedtheisraelgroup.org
Amateur doxers going after amateur know-it-alls. It doesn't get better than this.
That's how a lot of faildoxes work here, yeah.It's a major amateur move to announce three targets they're claiming to be very interested in but can't dox along with bad guesses about them. That is a recipe for faildoxing.
A list of lists. What has this world come to?I can one-up that.
List of lists of lists - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
View attachment 1020145
What can I say about this?
found a way to look at posts without paying. no moderators, this shit is going to be a mess
And his bizarre waist: looks like he's wearing a corset but not.Love the pencil dick on that faggot
From how untrusting I am of Wikipedia, I've started just read it and then go directly to their sources section. There's tons of times I've grabbed a source that has little to nothing to do with what was cited. It's pretty crap how there isn't a form of proofreading before it becomes published. (or rather it appears to be the case)It sucks how there's no known good alternative to Wikipedia.
And how Wikipedia always leads search results on everything.
that's really fucking awful. the guy is horrible horrible horrible.Wikipedia seems to be following the woke crowd when it comes to Rodney Reed. Removing all references to previous rape charges from his entry.
Talk:Rodney Reed - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
It's getting a bit of flak for it.
View attachment 1025344
Wikipedos don't read.Here's something I find remarkably stupid. A Boy's Life is a famous memoir by Tobias Wolff, one that goes into detail about his abusive upbringing and how he eventually escaped.
So why is it the only article on it is the movie adaptation and not the book it's based on?
![]()
This Boy's Life - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
It seems to do that with any perceived social justice issue, from "cultural appropriation" to "sexual objectification," from "microaggressions" to "racial fetishism." And there's the fact that there's multiple articles on such subjects in the first place -- which may even be translated into other languages now.Wikipedia seems to be following the woke crowd
It seems to do that with any perceived social justice issue, from "cultural appropriation" to "sexual objectification," from "microaggressions" to "racial fetishism." And there's the fact that there's multiple articles on such subjects in the first place -- which may even be translated into other languages now.
It seems to do that with any perceived social justice issue, from "cultural appropriation" to "sexual objectification," from "microaggressions" to "racial fetishism." And there's the fact that there's multiple articles on such subjects in the first place -- which may even be translated into other languages now.
Also the articles on people involved in such issues. They don't even acknowledge that Brianna Wu is a troon.