- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
He sounds pretty based to me.
Dumb Shit on Wikipedia
- Thread starter AnOminous
- Start date
He sounds pretty based to me.
piter_de_vries
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2017
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Still sounds pretty good to me. Wikipedia is full of biased bullshit and always has been. They're now canceling some guy who has actually tried to fix that? That's why people hate SJWs.
I agree on the general principle that we need to move past the 11th edition of the Encyclopaedia Britannica version of most facts that dominate most of their historical articles.
I just find it hilarious they're literally hunting down and destroying one of the guys who was doing this, for literally no reason at all.
This kind of shit is why I will never donate to wikipedia ever again. Anything short of absolutely defending their good faith editors is not worthy of support. Burn and die, Wikipedos.
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2019
follow up on that article. the primary fanboy was easily identified as Bnguyen1114. he wrote the majority of her article.
Kamala Harris's Wikipedia Page Is Being Edited
In recent presidential cycles, the velocity of edits made to a Wikipedia page have correlated with the choice of vice presidential running mate.theintercept.com
Story I caught in The Intercept about the politically motivated edit wars over likely-Democrat vice presidential appointee Kamala Harris. Some hack began scrubbing any negative content from her article with hundreds of alterations for "minor edits for length", constructing a massive fluff piece in the process with some edits apparently aping her campaign press releases word for word.
article goes is now in lockdown, arbitration committee looks into it
some questioning on his page. apparently he got doxed on twitter soon after the article.
kind of hard to say no affiliation when you've got 2 recent photos with the lady.
result is he was a temp topic ban from everyone he volunteered for. wow which he still violated and got his time out extended.
the ass mad editor Rhododendrites is one of the users you see show up at these contentious issues. he was on the yaniv defense squad when that was erased from the site.
so outcome is better than I would have expected, but all these articles are going to be press releases eventually. props to the intercept for catching it and stirring the pot.
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2020
Let's defend Wikipedos to own the immagrunts awesome style.
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2014
Nobody's mentioned BreadTube has a fawning Wikipedia page.
Notice how even with basic bitch anti-SJW stuff, it will usually be linked to "Far Right politics in [x]" pages or categories. Not even a mention of far left politics here.
Notice how even with basic bitch anti-SJW stuff, it will usually be linked to "Far Right politics in [x]" pages or categories. Not even a mention of far left politics here.
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2017
Because "far-right" is "anyone right of Hillary Clinton on any issue" while "far-left" is just the most hardcore of hardcore tankies who spend all day praising Mao and Stalin or occasionally North Korea and arguing with other left-wing lunatics on Twitter.
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2019
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kiwi_Farms
I don't know if this has been posted or discussed before but damn is it short.
I don't know if this has been posted or discussed before but damn is it short.
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2019
I was looking up some info about Christopher Walken on Wikipedia, and found this:
Now, that’s already autistic, but if you follow More Cowbell, you get:
Which not only explains and synopsizes the entire sketch but explains the differences between the sketch and reality, as well as its influences on culture.
Now, that’s already autistic, but if you follow More Cowbell, you get:
Which not only explains and synopsizes the entire sketch but explains the differences between the sketch and reality, as well as its influences on culture.
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2018
I instantly cringed when I saw the top of the themes section of the Full Metal Jacket.
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2019
They come out of the gate with a huge lie lol. Tons of people have reviewed FMJ, including a lot of scholars who aren't radical feminists writing about its themes.
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2020
You think Wikipedia favors China’s own Wikipedia page than they do to the U.S.’s?
I’m not saying they’re hiring Chinese editors from their country, but I wouldn’t be surprised if I heard that they’re now looking for more insight from an international perspective, and it just so happens that they chose the nation that we are still handling with kid gloves, but blame Russia as the scapegoat for some reason.
I’m not saying they’re hiring Chinese editors from their country, but I wouldn’t be surprised if I heard that they’re now looking for more insight from an international perspective, and it just so happens that they chose the nation that we are still handling with kid gloves, but blame Russia as the scapegoat for some reason.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2015
I love how they don't even try to be neutral or truthful anymore. People have been trying to remove this obvious attack entry for months but it's re-added every time because it "has sources", even though the sources state Trump has not been convicted of anything.
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2016
Ctrl+f "Jimmy Wales". No results.
This list is a lie.
This list is a lie.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2019
Hey did someone save that original Kamala Harris article
It's about to get edited really hard again now that its official
It's about to get edited really hard again now that its official
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2019
It was actually frozen several weeks ago due to massive editing by someone employed in her PR department.
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2020
A fun space to watch on Wikipedia is their "In the News" crap. It has a notable anti-US bias and some of the most abrasive personalities on Wikipedia. Take the bad weather centered around Iowa that affected at least half a million people, killed at least two, and destroyed a large amount of cropland (about a third!): two for inclusion and six against under the idea that it's "parochial."
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2014
No you think? Hell, I remember when "China" was a disambiguation page, and although to be fair, when talking about "China" in modern context is likely about the mainland and communist government, the decision to make it that page was probably supported by "one China" editors.
Even South Korea has professional netizens who shit on Japan-related articles, which is why you get English-language stubs on politicians with around four-fifths of the article saying he/she is a far-right nationalist and historical revisionist for supporting Allied accounts of what happened during WWII instead of the TRUE and HONEST Korean narrative.
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2020
I found there page for christian film industry, when it comes to mainstream christian movies a little weird. They say films such as Ben-Hur, The Ten Commandments, The Robe and The Passion of Christ are not considered part of the christian film industry. "And said their more agnostic about their audience religious beliefs." Like what? Those movies are based directly from the Bible. How are they agnostic to their audience?
Yeah sure, they are made my mainstream Hollywood. But the first three are movies were made in a time, where those movies weren't out of the ordinary.
The passion of Christ may be made by a mainstream stuido company. But Mel Gibson and Jim Caviezel are both christian conservatives. You would think Wikipedia would consider it being part of the christian film industry because of that.
Just found it weird
Yeah sure, they are made my mainstream Hollywood. But the first three are movies were made in a time, where those movies weren't out of the ordinary.
The passion of Christ may be made by a mainstream stuido company. But Mel Gibson and Jim Caviezel are both christian conservatives. You would think Wikipedia would consider it being part of the christian film industry because of that.
Just found it weird
