Dumb Shit on Wikipedia

[scathefire]

View attachment 2273554
When the conspiracy theorists are conspiring to conspire against a conspiracy to conspire against the conspiracy theorists in order to take over the world!

https://web.archive.org/web/20210618185739/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-gender_movement

How can something be a conspiracy theory when it's literally shoved right in front of your face all the time?

 

[Large]

How can something be a conspiracy theory when it's literally shoved right in front of your face all the time?

Because the conspiracy theory was created by a conspiracy which is trying to establish a new world order, wake up sheep furry.

 

[Toolbox]

John Doucette - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

This guy appeared in 280 films and this is the best they can get.

View attachment 2275904

Wikipedia is incredibly anal about anything that could lead them anywhere near even lukewarm water relating to copyright. Most species on the site don't even have photos avaliable even when image searches bring up hundreds, because not only are they afraid about any legal issues relating to image rights but they're too lazy to ask photographers for anything.

 

[AnOminous]

John Doucette - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

This guy appeared in 280 films and this is the best they can get.

View attachment 2275904

It's probably the only thing they could find in the public domain "because it was published in the United States between 1926 and 1977, inclusive, without a copyright notice[,]" to quote the copyright information on the picture's page. Almost no actual movies would be published without a copyright notice (although Night of the Living Dead was infamously so published), so they had to use a picture from a trailer.

Wikipedia has a joke of a media policy; on the one hand, the site is hosted in the US, yet the site seems to operate on almost British copyright law, which is much more strict with obvious cases of fair use (there was a big blow up several years ago when a user downloaded a bunch of scans of paintings off of a Brit website and the museum tried to claim the bullshit 'sweat of the brow' doctrine).

They can probably be haled into court nearly anywhere in the world because of their omnipresence, and both litigating copyright claims and the actual judgments in such cases can be exorbitant. IP lawyers are not cheap, and IP judgments are often outrageous.

 

[Corpun]

Cross-dressing, gender identity, and sexuality of Joan of Arc - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

What. The. Fuck.

I love the paragraphs without sources and using female saints who are almost certainly fictionalized and proof of transvestites in the Middle Ages.

Transgender personnel in the United States military - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

The United States Military has a long history of transgender service personnel, dating back to at least the Civil War. The subject began to engender some political controversy starting with a total ban on transgender servicemembers in 1960.

Troons served in the Civil War apparently, and to my utter surprise they select women disguised as men as their proof.

Albert Cashier - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

Albert D. J. Cashier (December 25, 1843 – October 10, 1915), born Jennie Irene Hodgers, was an Irish-born immigrant who served in the Union Army during the American Civil War. Cashier adopted the identity of a man before enlisting, and maintained it until death. Cashier became famous as one of a number of women soldiers who served as men during the Civil War, although the consistent and long-term (at least 53 years) commitment to a male identity has prompted some contemporary scholars to suggest that Cashier was a trans man.[3][4][5][6]

These are the standards wikipedos have. I wonder how many other famous women who disguised themselves as men to fight in wars have had their pages touched by troonery.

Here is a entire gay wikilist for troonism as well.

Outline of transgender topics - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

 

[NerdShamer]

Troons served in the Civil War apparently, and to my utter surprise they select women disguised as men as their proof.

Women generally did it to pay the bills or to go on an adventure of sorts. Cashier's case was the result of forced crossdressing.

 

[Corpun]

Transition Integrity Project - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Definitely an unobjectively written article for what definitely seems to have been some CIA level gay op. These lines with their shitty journos citations as especially stupid.

In addition, on January 6, 2021, the day Congress met to certify the votes of the Electoral College, Donald Trump held a rally in front of the White House[65] calling for a march on the Capital which resulted in an insurrection. This was the first such attack on the US Capital since the British burned the Capital in 1814.[66] Violence was also one of the possible outcomes that the TIP report suggested.

They intentionally write this with the intention of it being read as if he called for a coup.

Trump also personally pressured the Governor of Georgia, Republican Brian Kemp, to overturn the election.[59][60][61]

Clealry no one has decided to edit this line to change it since those calls have actually been released now.

Westbourne, West Sussex - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

• On 16th May 1785 James Biden married Anne Silverlock at Westbourne, both parishioners, and the great-great-great-great-grandparents of 46th US President Joe Biden.[7]

Wow such a notable citizen.

 

[scathefire]

Cross-dressing, gender identity, and sexuality of Joan of Arc - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

What. The. Fuck.

I love the paragraphs without sources and using female saints who are almost certainly fictionalized and proof of transvestites in the Middle Ages.

Transgender personnel in the United States military - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

Troons served in the Civil War apparently, and to my utter surprise they select women disguised as men as their proof.

Albert Cashier - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

These are the standards wikipedos have. I wonder how many other famous women who disguised themselves as men to fight in wars have had their pages touched by troonery.

Here is a entire gay wikilist for troonism as well.

Outline of transgender topics - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

I love when they take away the accomplishments of actual women by saying "this woman couldn't have done it as a woman, she must have really been a man on the inside".

 

[AnOminous]

They intentionally write this with the intention of it being read as if he called for a coup.

They also misspelled Capitol. Great attention to detail. Wikipedia truly went to shit when the detail-obsessed autists were overwhelmed by the illiterate SJW cunts.

The capital, no capital letters, is D.C. itself. The building they marched on is the Capitol Building.

Also, in terms of just retardedly getting absolutely basic history wrong, the British/Canadians did not just burn the Capitol building, nor did they burn the capital itself, but government buildings like the Capitol Building, the White House, and others.

As reprehensible as these deeds were, they were actually rather careful not to harm non-government properties. For instance, they tore down a newspaper building (National Intelligencer) because one of their dudes had been criticized in it. They were going to burn it down, but local people asked them not to because they were afraid the fire would spread, and they relented at least on the burning part.

Also, let's not forget, the fundamental factual claim, even ignoring inaccuracies, is itself absolute bullshit! What the British did isn't even the last attack on the Capitol. In fucking 1954, Puerto Rican separatists opened fire on the House while it was in session. And then there was the Weather Underground incident in 1971.

It's not like this isn't completely available to Wikipedos. Here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Capitol#List_of_security_incidents

And those weren't even the last. As recently as 2016 there was a shooting incident.

It's right in the fucking article on the Capitol, which I note is spelled correctly there, since at some point, the people who were editing Wikipedia weren't absolute retards.

In any event, these political morons are incapable of even getting basic high school level shit correct. I'm embarrassed ever to have donated to this project, which is now a complete fucking joke. This is the kind of thing I would previously have corrected myself, but fuck it, let it burn. Anyway, the dumbfuck autist who added this bullshit would probably immediately revert it and I'd be banned for "vandalism" for putting in the correct information linked to "Reliable Sources."

Note, the correct spelling of "Capitol" is even in two sources cited in this shit pit of an article.

Also note, this shit article got so much wrong in TWO FUCKING SENTENCES that it took a wall of text just to unwind everything flat out wrong and stupid about it.

 

[BluntyBitch]

Back in 13 or 14 I remember looking up the page of a Bolivian politician, because the state has a high indigenous population and I remember that one of them won and of course whitey was like no can't have that so it was highly contested. but I remember reading the English page and then reading the Spanish page and I remember the soa ish version page being much, much longer with additional paragraphs and section s. When I went to translate the Spanish page into English using Google translate (cuz I'm only so good at reading soanish), it just took me to the English page, but I'm telling you that the Spanish language wiki page was far different, it even had extra pictures.

I'm not a techiefag , can someone explain to me how that happened and if it still is?

 

[Large]

Back in 13 or 14 I remember looking up the page of a Bolivian politician, because the state has a high indigenous population and I remember that one of them won and of course whitey was like no can't have that so it was highly contested. but I remember reading the English page and then reading the Spanish page and I remember the soa ish version page being much, much longer with additional paragraphs and section s. When I went to translate the Spanish page into English using Google translate (cuz I'm only so good at reading soanish), it just took me to the English page, but I'm telling you that the Spanish language wiki page was far different, it even had extra pictures.

I'm not a techiefag , can someone explain to me how that happened and if it still is?

The different language versions of Wikipedia are actually separate wikipedias.

 

[BluntyBitch]

The different language versions of Wikipedia are actually separate wikipedias.

How come Google translate wouldn't translate the Spanish page for me then? I was really confused as to why it just reverted to the shorter English page. I wanted to read the extra shit on the Spanish version but I knew there were some words I didn't know.

 

[Large]

How come Google translate wouldn't translate the Spanish page for me then? I was really confused as to why it just reverted to the shorter English page. I wanted to read the extra shit on the Spanish version but I knew there were some words I didn't know.

Because Google.

 

[Observotron]

Troons served in the Civil War apparently, and to my utter surprise they select women disguised as men as their proof.

Albert Cashier - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

I don't think these people know why those women disguised themselves as men lol.

 

[Corpun]

I don't think these people know why those women disguised themselves as men lol.

They really don't.

Opal Lee - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

A freshly made Wiki article for a literal who over Juneteenf. The whole thing reads like a fucking children's book, especially the ending paragraph. It doesn't help every source is a journos article parroting every other journos article.

In June 2021, at the age of 94, her efforts succeeded as a bill to make Juneteenth a federal holiday was passed by Congress and signed into law by President Joe Biden. She was an honored guest at the bill signing ceremony, receiving the first of many pens Biden used to sign the document.[16] As she sat in the front row, she received a standing ovation and Biden got down on one knee to greet her.

And they all lived happily ever after...

 

[Fetish Roulette]

I don't think these people know why those women disguised themselves as men lol.

In other news, the historians of Wikipedia have uncovered details about a Stunning and Brave transgender pirate named Anne Bonny! Reportedly, their next project is examining a mythological figure named "Mulan" to further heckin' validate their tranny patrons.

 

[NerdShamer]

In other news, the historians of Wikipedia have uncovered details about a Stunning and Brave transgender pirate named Anne Bonny!

Yeah, that would be hilarious. So where does it says this? Because they got Bonny listed as an crossdresser.

 

[AnOminous]

In other news, the historians of Wikipedia have uncovered details about a Stunning and Brave transgender pirate named Anne Bonny! Reportedly, their next project is examining a mythological figure named "Mulan" to further heckin' validate their tranny patrons.

Troons are worse than Mormons about retroactively recruiting dead people. At least Mormons don't go around adding Wikipedia entries claiming Hitler was a Mormon.

 

[Fetish Roulette]

Yeah, that would be hilarious. So where does it says this? Because they got Bonny listed as an crossdresser.

They haven't (yet). I was making a joke.

 

[Pissmaster]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Area_Codes_(song)

Oh no! Anyway,